Literature DB >> 23404931

A human nasal explant model to study Staphylococcus aureus biofilm in vitro.

Daniel Cantero1, Clare Cooksley, Camille Jardeleza, Ahmed Bassiouni, Damien Jones, Peter-John Wormald, Sarah Vreugde.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) biofilm has been associated with severe and recalcitrant cases of chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS). However, its role in the pathophysiology of this condition is not completely understood. This study aims to develop a sinonasal tissue explant model to analyze the interaction of S. aureus biofilm with the mucosa in vitro.
METHODS: Sinonasal tissue samples from 5 control patients undergoing pituitary surgery were cultured with and without S. aureus biofilm in vitro. Confocal scanning laser microscopy (CSLM) using the Live/Dead BacLight stain and histology were performed on the tissue explants after 24 hours of biofilm challenge. Measurements of IL-6, at both the messenger RNA (mRNA) level (using quantitative reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction [qRT-PCR]) and the protein level (using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay [ELISA]), were undertaken to evaluate biofilm-mucosa interaction.
RESULTS: Viability of the explants after 24 hours was confirmed by CSLM and histology. Although light microscopy failed to identify S. aureus biofilms, its presence was confirmed in the biofilm-challenged samples by CSLM. IL-6 mRNA transcript levels were 4.9-fold upregulated in biofilm-treated tissue compared to controls (p = 0.0485). A similar trend was observed at the protein level (p = 0.0313).
CONCLUSION: The sinonasal tissue explant is a viable and functional model capable of analyzing direct biofilm-mucosal interactions and can advance our understanding of the role played by S. aureus biofilm in sinus inflammation. Our model suggests that S. aureus biofilms in the initial phase of growth are not inert bystanders but elicit an immune response in the sinonasal mucosa.
© 2013 ARS-AAOA, LLC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Staphylococcus aureus; biofilms; confocal; innate immunity; nasal mucosa; organ culture; paranasal sinuses; sinusitis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23404931     DOI: 10.1002/alr.21146

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Forum Allergy Rhinol        ISSN: 2042-6976            Impact factor:   3.858


  5 in total

1.  Colonisation and interaction between S. epidermidis and S. aureus in the nose and throat of healthy adolescents.

Authors:  E G A Fredheim; T Flægstad; F Askarian; C Klingenberg
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-08-01       Impact factor: 3.267

2.  Sinonasal microbiome sampling: a comparison of techniques.

Authors:  Ahmed Bassiouni; Edward John Cleland; Alkis James Psaltis; Sarah Vreugde; Peter-John Wormald
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Mammary Gland Pathology Subsequent to Acute Infection with Strong versus Weak Biofilm Forming Staphylococcus aureus Bovine Mastitis Isolates: A Pilot Study Using Non-Invasive Mouse Mastitis Model.

Authors:  Jully Gogoi-Tiwari; Vincent Williams; Charlene Babra Waryah; Paul Costantino; Hani Al-Salami; Sangeetha Mathavan; Kelsi Wells; Harish Kumar Tiwari; Nagendra Hegde; Shrikrishna Isloor; Hesham Al-Sallami; Trilochan Mukkur
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Differences in RANTES and IL-6 levels among chronic rhinosinusitis patients with predominant gram-negative and gram-positive infection.

Authors:  Almoaidbellah Rammal; Marc Tewfik; Simon Rousseau
Journal:  J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2017-01-17

5.  Primary human nasal epithelial cells: a source of poly (I:C) LMW-induced IL-6 production.

Authors:  Mahnaz Ramezanpour; Harrison Bolt; Alkis James Psaltis; Peter-John Wormald; Sarah Vreugde
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.