Literature DB >> 2340400

Hypertensive anal cushions as a cause of the high anal canal pressures in patients with haemorrhoids.

W M Sun1, N W Read, A J Shorthouse.   

Abstract

Anorectal manometry and electrophysiology studies were conducted in 25 men with non-prolapsing haemorrhoids, ten men with prolapsing haemorrhoids, and 20 age-matched normal men. Mean(s.e.m.) minimum basal pressures were significantly higher in patients with non-prolapsing haemorrhoids than in normals (61(5) versus 43(7) cmH2O; P less than 0.05) or patients with prolapsing haemorrhoids (55(4) cmH2O; P less than 0.05). There were no significant differences in maximum basal pressures and maximum squeeze pressures. During rectal distension, all normal subjects showed relaxation in all anal channels. However, 92 per cent of patients with non-prolapsing haemorrhoids and 40 per cent of patients with prolapsing haemorrhoids showed no relaxation in the outer anal channels, even when relaxation occurred in the inner anal channels; internal sphincter electrical slow waves were suppressed and the integrated electrical activity of the external sphincter had returned to predistension values. Maximum residual anal pressures during balloon distension were significantly higher in patients with non-prolapsing haemorrhoids than normals (75(7) versus 45(7) cmH2O; P less than 0.01), or patients with prolapsing haemorrhoids (53(3) cmH2O; P less than 0.05). When subjects increased intra-abdominal pressure rectal pressure was significantly higher in patients with non-prolapsing haemorrhoids than in normal subjects (157(10) versus 105(15) cmH2O; P less than 0.05), but not in patients with prolapsing haemorrhoids (126(14) cmH2O). Resting anal cushion pressures in patients with non-prolapsing or prolapsing haemorrhoids were much higher than normal capillary or venous pressure and significantly higher than those recorded in normals (median 35, 35 versus 10 cmH2O; P less than 0.0001). Pressures recorded during coughing (60, 60 versus 30 cmH2O) and straining (78, 80 versus 55 cmH2O) were also significantly higher (P less than 0.0001) in patients than in normals. Pressures after straining were higher than those recorded before (38 versus 29 cmH2O; P less than 0.05) in 60 per cent of patients but no normal subjects and took 18-36 s to return to baseline. This study suggests that the abnormally high pressures in the anal canal in patients with haemorrhoids may be related to an increased vascular pressure in the anal cushions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2340400     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800770430

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  14 in total

1.  Development and validation of a practical score to predict pain after excisional hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Francesco Selvaggi; Gianluca Pellino; Guido Sciaudone; Giuseppe Candilio; Silvestro Canonico
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Long-term manometric study of anal sphincter function after hemorrhoidectomy.

Authors:  Rosalia Patti; Piero Luigi Almasio; Matteo Arcara; Massimiliano Sparacello; Stefania Termine; Sebastiano Bonventre; Gaetano Di Vita
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2006-07-22       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Outcomes of Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation: analysis of 90 consecutive patients.

Authors:  M Spyridakis; G Christodoulidis; D Symeonidis; D Dimas; A Diamantis; E Polychronopoulou; K Tepetes
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 3.781

4.  Histopathological changes in haemorrhoid associated mucosa and submucosa.

Authors:  S M Kaftan; N Y Haboubi
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Fecal evacuation disorders in anal fissure, hemorrhoids, and solitary rectal ulcer syndrome.

Authors:  Mayank Jain; Rajiv Baijal; M Srinivas; Jayanthi Venkataraman
Journal:  Indian J Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-01

6.  Comparison of early and 1-year follow-up results of conventional hemorrhoidectomy and hemorrhoid artery ligation: a randomized study.

Authors:  Attila Bursics; Krisztina Morvay; Péter Kupcsulik; Lajos Flautner
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-07-05       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Comparative Analysis of Doppler Guided Hemorrhoidal Artery Ligation (DG-HAL) & Infrared Coagulation (IRC) in Management of Hemorrhoids.

Authors:  Arshad Ahmad; Rama Kant; Avneet Gupta
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-05-06       Impact factor: 0.656

8.  Transanal haemorrhoidal dearterialisation: nonexcisional surgery for the treatment of haemorrhoidal disease.

Authors:  P P Dal Monte; C Tagariello; M Sarago; P Giordano; A Shafi; E Cudazzo; M Franzini
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-12-03       Impact factor: 3.781

9.  Evaluation and management of hemorrhoids: Italian society of colorectal surgery (SICCR) consensus statement.

Authors:  M Trompetto; G Clerico; G F Cocorullo; P Giordano; F Marino; J Martellucci; G Milito; M Mistrangelo; C Ratto
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2015-09-24       Impact factor: 3.781

10.  A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of a Chinese herbal Sophora flower formula in patients with symptomatic haemorrhoids: a preliminary study.

Authors:  Kee-Ming Man; Wen-Chi Chen; Hwei-Ming Wang; Huey-Yi Chen; Jui-Lung Shen; Lieh-Der Chen; Fuu-Jen Tsai; Yung-Hsiang Chen; De-Xin Yu; Feng-Fan Chiang
Journal:  Afr J Tradit Complement Altern Med       Date:  2012-12-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.