Literature DB >> 23403986

Investigating the potential public health benefit of jail-based screening and treatment programs for chlamydia.

Kwame Owusu-Edusei1, Thomas L Gift, Harrell W Chesson, Charlotte K Kent.   

Abstract

Observational studies have found mixed results on the impact of jail-based chlamydia screen-and-treat programs on community prevalence. In the absence of controlled trials or prospectively designed studies, dynamic mathematical models that incorporate movements in and out of jail and sexual contacts (including disease transmission) can provide useful information. We explored the impact of jail-based chlamydia screening on a hypothetical community's prevalence with a deterministic compartmental model focusing on heterosexual transmission. Parameter values were obtained from the published literature. Two analyses were conducted. One used national values (large community); the other used values reported among African Americans--the population with the highest incarceration rates and chlamydia burden (small community). A comprehensive sensitivity analysis was carried out. For the large-community analysis, chlamydia prevalence decreased by 13% (from 2.3% to 2.0%), and based on the ranges of parameter values (including screening coverage of 10%-100% and a postscreening treatment rate of 50%-100%) used in the sensitivity analysis, this decrease ranged from 0.1% to 58%. For the small-community analysis, chlamydia prevalence decreased by 54% (from 4.6% to 2.1%). Jail-based chlamydia screen-and-treat programs have the potential to reduce chlamydia prevalence in communities with high incarceration rates. However, the magnitude of this potential decrease is subject to considerable uncertainty.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23403986     DOI: 10.1093/aje/kws240

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  12 in total

1.  Sexually transmitted diseases treatment guidelines, 2015.

Authors:  Kimberly A Workowski; Gail A Bolan
Journal:  MMWR Recomm Rep       Date:  2015-06-05

2.  Chlamydia screening and positivity in juvenile detention centers, United States, 2009-2011.

Authors:  Catherine Lindsey Satterwhite; Daniel Newman; Dayne Collins; Elizabeth Torrone
Journal:  Women Health       Date:  2014

3.  Infectious Diseases and the Criminal Justice System.

Authors:  Ank E Nijhawan
Journal:  Am J Med Sci       Date:  2016-05-27       Impact factor: 2.378

4.  Dynamic Models of Infectious Disease Transmission in Prisons and the General Population.

Authors:  Martial L Ndeffo-Mbah; Vivian S Vigliotti; Laura A Skrip; Kate Dolan; Alison P Galvani
Journal:  Epidemiol Rev       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 6.222

5.  Ecological analysis examining the association between census tract-level incarceration and reported chlamydia incidence among female adolescents and young adults in San Francisco.

Authors:  Juliet E Stoltey; Ye Li; Kyle T Bernstein; Susan S Philip
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 3.519

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Opt-Out Chlamydia Testing for High-Risk Young Women in the U.S.

Authors:  Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Karen W Hoover; Thomas L Gift
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2016-03-04       Impact factor: 5.043

7.  Sexually transmitted infections among incarcerated women: findings from a decade of screening in a Los Angeles County Jail, 2002-2012.

Authors:  Marjan Javanbakht; Melina Boudov; Laura J Anderson; Mark Malek; Lisa V Smith; Michael Chien; Sarah Guerry
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2014-09-11       Impact factor: 9.308

8.  HIV, Sexually Transmitted Infection, and Substance Use Continuum of Care Interventions Among Criminal Justice-Involved Black Men Who Have Sex With Men: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nina T Harawa; Russell Brewer; Victoria Buckman; Santhoshini Ramani; Aditya Khanna; Kayo Fujimoto; John A Schneider
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2018-11       Impact factor: 9.308

9.  Screening Peter to Save Paul: The Population-Level Effects of Screening Men Who Have Sex With Men for Gonorrhea and Chlamydia.

Authors:  Alison D Ridpath; Harrell Chesson; Julia L Marcus; Robert D Kirkcaldy; Elizabeth A Torrone; Sevgi O Aral; Kyle T Bernstein
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2018-09       Impact factor: 2.830

10.  Cost-effectiveness of screening men in Maricopa County jails for chlamydia and gonorrhea to avert infections in women.

Authors:  Chaitra Gopalappa; Ya-Lin A Huang; Thomas L Gift; Kwame Owusu-Edusei; Melanie Taylor; Vincent Gales
Journal:  Sex Transm Dis       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 2.830

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.