Literature DB >> 2340372

Is routine primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection still justified in patients with low stage non-seminomatous testicular cancer?

N Aass1, S D Fosså, S Ous, H H Lien, A E Stenwig, E Paus, O Kaalhus.   

Abstract

We present 8 years' experience of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RLND) in 190 patients with low stage non-seminoma; 154 patients had clinical stage I (CSI) and 36 had clinical stage IIa (CSIIa) disease. Of the 154 patients with CSI tumours, 33 had increased serum AFP and/or HCG before RLND (CSIM+) and 121 had normal tumour markers (CSIM-). Retroperitoneal lymph node metastases (pathological stage II) (PSII) were found in 38 of 121 patients with CSIM-, in 19 of 33 patients with CSIIM+ and in 26 of 36 patients with CSIIa. In a multivariate analysis, the presence of small vessel infiltration (demonstrated in histological sections of the primary tumour) and a prolonged tumour marker half-life were predictive factors for PSII. These 2 factors enabled a group of non-seminoma patients with CSI disease to be identified who had a 15% risk of retroperitoneal tumour growth (low risk group) as compared with a high risk group where 60 to 70% of patients had retroperitoneal lymph node metastases. Relapses occurred in 7 of 107 patients with PSI and in 6 of 83 patients with PSII disease; in the latter group, 5 relapses developed before the start of routine adjuvant chemotherapy; 6% of patients developed major post-operative complications. In addition, "dry ejaculation" was the principal side effect following RLND (unilateral RLND: 20/132 patients; bilateral RLND: 50/54 patients). The comparative cost to the health service during the first year of follow-up was estimated for low risk non-seminoma patients with CSI subjected to RLND and for those in whom a surveillance policy was adopted. The latter approach was preferable. It was concluded that a surveillance policy should be followed in low risk non-seminoma CSI patients provided that frequent follow-up is possible. A more active policy is recommended in high risk patients (e.g. adjuvant chemotherapy without RLND). Nerve-sparing RLND may be considered in patients with CSIIa disease and negative tumour markers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2340372     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410x.1990.tb14762.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Urol        ISSN: 0007-1331


  2 in total

1.  Is modified retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (MRLND) still feasible in the treatment of patients with clinical stage I non-seminomatous testicular cancer?

Authors:  M Sosnowski; L Jeromin; A Płuzańska
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 2.370

2.  How safe is surveillance in patients with histologically low-risk non-seminomatous testicular cancer in a geographically extended country with limited computerised tomographic resources?

Authors:  S D Fosså; A B Jacobsen; N Aass; A Heilo; A E Stenwig; O Kummen; N B Johannessen; G Waaler; P Ogreid; L Borge
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 7.640

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.