Literature DB >> 23403530

Steps to a better Belfast: physical activity assessment and promotion in primary care.

Neil Heron1, Mark A Tully2, Michelle C McKinley2, Margaret E Cupples3.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Low physical activity (PA) levels which increase the risk of chronic disease are reported by two-thirds of the general UK population. Promotion of PA by primary healthcare professionals is advocated but more evidence is needed regarding effective ways of integrating this within everyday practice. This study aims to explore the feasibility of a randomised trial of a pedometer-based intervention, using step-count goals, recruiting patients from primary care.
METHOD: Patients, aged 35-75, attending four practices in socioeconomically deprived areas, were invited to complete a General Practice PA Questionnaire during routine consultations. Health professionals invited 'inactive' individuals to a pedometer-based intervention and were randomly allocated to group 1 (prescribed a self-determined goal) or group 2 (prescribed a specific goal of 2500 steps/day above baseline). Both groups kept step-count diaries and received telephone follow-up at 1, 2, 6 and 11 weeks. Step counts were reassessed after 12 weeks.
RESULTS: Of the 2154 patients attending, 192 questionnaires were completed (8.9%). Of these, 83 were classified as 'inactive'; 41(10 men; 31 women) completed baseline assessments, with the mean age of participants being 51 years. Mean baseline step counts were similar in group 1 (5685, SD 2945) and group 2 (6513, SD 3350). The mean increase in steps/day was greater in groups 1 than 2 ((2602, SD 1957) vs (748, SD 1997) p=0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: A trial of a pedometer-based intervention using self-determined step counts appears feasible in primary care. Pedometers appear acceptable to women, particularly at a perimenopausal age, when it is important to engage in impact loading activities such as walking to maintain bone mineral density. An increase of 2500 steps/day is achievable for inactive patients, but the effectiveness of different approaches to realistic goal-setting warrants further study. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23403530     DOI: 10.1136/bjsports-2012-091581

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Sports Med        ISSN: 0306-3674            Impact factor:   13.800


  4 in total

1.  Rehabilitation of patients after transient ischaemic attack or minor stroke: pilot feasibility randomised trial of a home-based prevention programme.

Authors:  Neil Heron; Frank Kee; Jonathan Mant; Margaret E Cupples; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2019-09-26       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Relationship between Bone-Specific Physical Activity Scores and Measures for Body Composition and Bone Mineral Density in Healthy Young College Women.

Authors:  SoJung Kim; Wi-Young So; Jooyoung Kim; Dong Jun Sung
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Stroke Prevention Rehabilitation Intervention Trial of Exercise (SPRITE) - a randomised feasibility study.

Authors:  Neil Heron; Frank Kee; Jonathan Mant; Philip M Reilly; Margaret Cupples; Mark Tully; Michael Donnelly
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2017-12-12       Impact factor: 2.298

4.  An mHealth Intervention Using a Smartphone App to Increase Walking Behavior in Young Adults: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Jane C Walsh; Teresa Corbett; Michael Hogan; Jim Duggan; Abra McNamara
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2016-09-22       Impact factor: 4.773

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.