Literature DB >> 23403330

Endovascular repair with fenestrated-branched stent grafts improves 30-day outcomes for complex aortic aneurysms compared with open repair.

Nikolaos Tsilimparis1, Sebastian Perez, Anand Dayama, Joseph J Ricotta.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Endovascular repair is associated with better 30-day outcomes than open surgical repair for patients with infrarenal aortic aneurysms. In patients with complex aortic aneurysms (CAAs) requiring suprarenal or supravisceral aortic cross-clamping during open repair, few data exist directly comparing the real-world outcomes of open repair versus endovascular repair with fenestrated-branched stent grafts (FEVAR).
METHODS: Outcomes for patients who underwent elective CAA repair using open repair and FEVAR between 2005 and 2010 were analyzed using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. CAA was defined as aneurysm of the aorta involving the visceral and/or renal arteries.
RESULTS: This study compared 1091 patients who underwent open repair (group A: male, 71.5%; age, 71 ± 9 years) with 264 patients treated with FEVAR (group B: male, 82.2%; age, 74 ± 9 years). The 2 groups did not significantly differ with respect to American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification (ASA III/IV: A, 93%; B, 95%, P = 0.6), severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (A: 21%; B: 22%; P = 0.7), prior cardiac surgery (A: 24%; B: 20%; P = 0.19), or preoperative renal function (glomerular filtration rate: A: 69 ± 2; B: 70 ± 27; P = 0.535). Group A had significantly higher risk of any complication (A: 42%; B: 19%; P < 0.001), nonsurgical complications (A: 30%; B: 8%; P < 0.001), pulmonary complications (A: 21%; B: 2%; P < 0.001), renal complications (A: 10%; B: 1.5%; P = 0.001), and any cardiovascular complication (A: 8%; B: 2%; P < 0.001). The composite end point of surgical site infections/graft failure/bleeding transfusions were also higher in group A (A: 22%; B: 15%; P = 0.014). Thirty-day mortality was significantly lower for FEVAR (A: 5.4%; B: 0.8%; P = 0.001), as was total length of hospital stay (A: 11 ± 10 days; B: 4 ± 5 days; P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide real-world database suggests that in similar patient populations, repair of CAAs with FEVAR is associated with reduced 30-day morbidity and mortality compared with open repair. Although long-term comparative studies are needed, FEVAR may represent a preferred treatment alternative to open repair for patients with CAAs.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23403330     DOI: 10.1016/j.avsg.2012.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  12 in total

1.  Perioperative outcome of endovascular repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Klaas H J Ultee; Sara L Zettervall; Peter A Soden; Jeremy Darling; Hence J M Verhagen; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-02-16       Impact factor: 4.268

Review 2.  Surgical Versus Endovascular Aortic Aneurysm Repair: Evidence to Guide the Optimal Approach for the Individual Patient.

Authors:  Theodore Hart; Ross Milner
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 5.113

3.  Outcomes of surgeon-modified fenestrated-branched endograft repair for acute aortic pathology.

Authors:  Salvatore T Scali; Dan Neal; Vida Sollanek; Tomas Martin; Julie Sablik; Thomas S Huber; Adam W Beck
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2015-08-05       Impact factor: 4.268

4.  Fenestrated endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  C Canning; Z Martin; M P Colgan; O Abdulrahim; M McCafferty; J Fitzpatrick; S N Haider; P Madhavan; S O'Neill
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2014-03-06       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion.

Authors:  Vania Tacher; MingDe Lin; Pascal Desgranges; Jean-Francois Deux; Thijs Grünhagen; Jean-Pierre Becquemin; Alain Luciani; Alain Rahmouni; Hicham Kobeiter
Journal:  J Vasc Interv Radiol       Date:  2013-09-12       Impact factor: 3.464

Review 6.  Fenestrated and Branched Aortic Grafts.

Authors:  Bartosz Rylski; Martin Czerny; Michael Südkamp; Maximilian Russe; Matthiase Siep; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2015-11-27       Impact factor: 5.594

7.  Early experience with fenestrated stent grafts for treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Naoki Unno; Naoto Yamamoto; Wataru Higashiura; Minoru Suzuki; Yuuki Mano; Masaki Sano; Takaaki Saito; Ryota Sugisawa; Hiroyuki Konno
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2013-09-05

8.  Decision uncertainty and value of further research: a case-study in fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

Authors:  Oriana Ciani; David Epstein; Claire Rothery; Rod S Taylor; Mark Sculpher
Journal:  Cost Eff Resour Alloc       Date:  2018-04-16

9.  Meta-analysis of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair versus open surgical repair of juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysms over the last 10 years.

Authors:  A D Jones; M A Waduud; P Walker; D Stocken; M A Bailey; D J A Scott
Journal:  BJS Open       Date:  2019-05-17

10.  Comparable mid-term survival in patients undergoing elective fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair and endovascular aneurysm repair for abdominal aortic aneurysm.

Authors:  Sofia Nessvi; Anders Gottsäter; Stefan Acosta
Journal:  SAGE Open Med       Date:  2014-01-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.