| Literature DB >> 23403233 |
Ying Piao1, Zhaozhe Liu, Zhenyu Ding, Long Xu, Fang Guo, Qingqing Sun, Xiaodong Xie.
Abstract
Emerging evidences from preclinical and clinical studies have shown that epidermal growth factor (EGF) has some effectiveness against endogenously arising carcinogenesis. Functional +61A>G polymorphism (rs4444903 A>G) in the promoter region of the EGF gene was observed to modulate EGF levels, thus affecting the susceptibility to gastrointestinal cancer; but individually published studies showed inconclusive results. The aim of this Human Genome Epidemiology (HuGE) review and meta-analysis was to derive a more precise estimation of the association between EGF +61A>G polymorphism and gastrointestinal cancer risk. A literature search of Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science and Chinese BioMedical databases from inception through July 2012 was conducted. Twelve studies were assessed with a total of 2868 gastrointestinal cancer cases and 4278 healthy controls. When all the eligible studies were pooled into the meta-analysis, the results showed that the G allele and GG genotype of EGF +61A>G polymorphism might increase the risk of gastrointestinal cancer. In the stratified analysis by cancer types, the G allele and GG genotype of EGF +61A>G polymorphism showed displayed significant correlations with increased risk of esophageal cancer. We also found significant correlations between the G carrier (GG+AG) and GG genotype of EGF +61A>G polymorphism and colorectal cancer risk. However, EGF +61A>G polymorphism did not appear to have an influence on gastric cancer susceptibility. Results from the current meta-analysis indicate that EGF +61A>G polymorphism might increase the risk of esophageal and colorectal cancers. Nevertheless, further studies are needed to determine whether genetic associations between EGF +61A>G polymorphism and susceptibility to gastric cancer are significant.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23403233 DOI: 10.1016/j.gene.2013.01.057
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Gene ISSN: 0378-1119 Impact factor: 3.688