Literature DB >> 23403213

Acute perforated peptic ulcer: on clinical experience in an urban tertiary hospital in south east Nigeria.

A I Ugochukwu1, O C Amu, M A Nzegwu, U C Dilibe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute perforated peptic ulcer is a leading cause of generalized peritonitis and its management has continued to be a challenging task in our environment.
OBJECTIVE: There is a paucity of published reports on acute perforated peptic ulcers in our environment. This study was conducted to evaluate the different pattern of risk factors clinical presentations, management and clinical outcome of patients with acute perforated peptic ulcer in our setting and to highlight the factors that continue to account for the high mortality and morbidity as seen here.
METHOD: A retrospective study where data of seventy-six (76) patients managed for generalized peritonitis due to acute peptic ulcer perforation over a five year period (January 2006-December 2010) were retrieved from medical records of Enugu State University of Science and Technology Hospital (ESUTH). The patients' biodata, clinical and operative findings and treatment outcome were extracted and analysed, after institutional ethical approval was secured. All other cases of generalized peritonitis not traceable to acute peptic ulcer perforation were excluded from the study.
RESULTS: There were76 patients; 58 males and 18 females (M:F = 3.2:1) Their ages ranged from 20 to 80years with a mean of 39.5yr and SD ± 13.10years. Majority of the patients 49(64.4%) were 40years of age and below and only 24 (31.6%) had a previous history suggestive of chronic peptic ulcer disease. Twenty five (32.9%) patients presented within 24 h of onset of symptoms of perforation with a mortality of 8.0%. Slightly more than half of our patients 39(51.3%) presented between 24 and 48 h with mortality of 17.9%. Twelve patients (15.8%) presented between 48 and 72 h and the mortality in this group was 58.3%. The latter two groups accounted for most of the mortality in our series. All perforations were anterior perforations within the first 2.5 cm of the duodenum and all had simple closure with pedicled omental patch and peritoneal toilet with copious volumes of warm normal saline. Postoperatively all received Helicobacter pylori eradication therapy and proton pump inhibitors for at least two months.
CONCLUSION: Patient groups who presented early had low mortality rates, but patient groups who presented late had higher mortality rates. Overall mortality was 21%.
Copyright © 2013. Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23403213     DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2013.01.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Surg        ISSN: 1743-9159            Impact factor:   6.071


  13 in total

1.  Long-Term Mortality in Patients Operated for Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Factors Limiting Longevity are Dominated by Older Age, Comorbidity Burden and Severe Postoperative Complications.

Authors:  K Thorsen; J A Søreide; K Søreide
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Clinical presentation and surgical management of perforated peptic ulcer in a tertiary hospital in Mogadishu, Somalia: a 5-year retrospective study.

Authors:  Abdihamid Mohamed Ali; Abdulkadir Nor Mohamed; Yahye Garad Mohamed; Salim İdris Keleşoğlu
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 8.165

Review 3.  Surgery for Peptic Ulcer Disease in sub-Saharan Africa: Systematic Review of Published Data.

Authors:  Jennifer Rickard
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-16       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  The Association Between Helicobacter Pylori and Perforated Gastroduodenal Ulcer.

Authors:  Katavath Thirupathaiah; Loganathan Jayapal; Anandhi Amaranathan; Chellappa Vijayakumar; Mangala Goneppanavar; Vishnu Prasad Nelamangala Ramakrishnaiah
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2020-03-25

5.  Changing pattern of perforated PUD: Are NSAIDs to be blamed?

Authors:  Ochonma Egwuonwu; Okoli Chinedu; Gabriel Chianakwana; Stanley Anyanwu; Chiemelu Emegoakor; Henry Nzeako
Journal:  Turk J Surg       Date:  2019-06-13

6.  What is the best predictor of mortality in perforated peptic ulcer disease? A population-based, multivariable regression analysis including three clinical scoring systems.

Authors:  Kenneth Thorsen; Jon Arne Søreide; Kjetil Søreide
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-03-08       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Postoperative Morbidity and Mortality of Perforated Peptic Ulcer: Retrospective Cohort Study of Risk Factors among Black Africans in Côte d'Ivoire.

Authors:  Soro Kountele Gona; Mahassadi Kouamé Alassan; Koffi Gnangoran Marcellin; Kissi Ya Henriette; Coulibaly Adama; Assohoun Toussaint; Ehua Adjoba Manuela; Seu Gagon Sylvain; Afum-Adjei Awuah Anthony; Ehua Somian Francis
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2016-01-26       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  A Five-Year Review of Perforated Peptic Ulcer Disease in Irrua, Nigeria.

Authors:  A E Dongo; O Uhunmwagho; E B Kesieme; S U Eluehike; E F Alufohai
Journal:  Int Sch Res Notices       Date:  2017-06-01

9.  Risk Factors that Affect Morbidity and Mortality in Patients with Perforated Peptic Ulcer Diseases in a Teaching Hospital.

Authors:  Nebyou Seyoum; Daba Ethicha; Zelalem Assefa; Berhanu Nega
Journal:  Ethiop J Health Sci       Date:  2020-07-01

10.  Pattern and outcome of perforated peptic ulcer disease patient in four teaching hospitals in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia: a prospective cohort multicenter study.

Authors:  Jatani Arero Bupicha; Hailu Wondimu Gebresellassie; Abebe Alemayehu
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2020-06-15       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.