Literature DB >> 23403141

Effects of computerized decision support systems on blood glucose regulation in critically ill surgical patients.

Sandy L Fogel1, Christopher C Baker.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The use of computerized decision support systems (CDSS) in glucose control for critically ill surgical patients has been reported in both diabetic and nondiabetic patients. Prospective studies evaluating its effect on glucose control are, however, lacking. The objective of this study was to evaluate patient-specific computerized IV insulin dosing on blood glucose levels (BGLs) by comparing patients treated pre-CDSS with those treated post-CDSS. STUDY
DESIGN: A prospective study was performed in 4 surgical ICUs and 1 progressive care unit comparing patient data pre- and post-implementation of CDSS. The primary outcomes measures were the impact of the CDSS on glycemic control in this population and on reducing the incidence of severe hypoglycemia.
RESULTS: Data on 1,682 patient admissions were evaluated, which corresponded to 73,290 BGLs post-CDSS compared with 44,972 BGLs pre-CDSS. The percentage of hyperglycemic events improved, with BGLs of >150 mg/dL decreasing by 50% compared with 6-month historical controls during the 18-month study period from July 2010 through December 2011. This was true for all 5 units individually (p < 0.0001, by one sample sign test). In addition, severe hypoglycemia (defined as BGL <40 mg/dL) decreased from 1% to 0.05% after implementing CDSS (p < 0.0001 by 2-sided binomial test).
CONCLUSIONS: Patients whose BGLs were managed using CDSS were statistically significantly more likely to have a glucose reading under control (<150 mg/dL) than in the 6-month historical controls and to avoid serious hypoglycemia (p < 0.0001).
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23403141     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  7 in total

1.  Response to Letter Concerning Comparison Between Different Electronic Glucose Management Technologies.

Authors:  Pedro D Salinas; Carlos E Mendez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-05-13

2.  Risk of Hypoglycemia During Insulin Infusion Directed by Paper Protocol Versus Electronic Glycemic Management System in Critically Ill Patients at a Large Academic Medical Center.

Authors:  Marina Rabinovich; Jessica Grahl; Emily Durr; Rita Gayed; Katleen Chester; Raymie McFarland; Barbara McLean
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-17

3.  Glucose Management Technologies for the Critically Ill.

Authors:  Pedro D Salinas; Carlos E Mendez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-01-13

4.  Predicting outcomes in patients with perforated gastroduodenal ulcers: artificial neural network modelling indicates a highly complex disease.

Authors:  K Søreide; K Thorsen; J A Søreide
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 3.693

5.  Conceptual Framework for Developing a Diabetes Information Network.

Authors:  Hossein Riazi; Mostafa Langarizadeh; Bagher Larijani; Leila Shahmoradi
Journal:  Acta Inform Med       Date:  2016-06-04

Review 6.  Systematic review of clinical decision support interventions with potential for inpatient cost reduction.

Authors:  Christopher L Fillmore; Bruce E Bray; Kensaku Kawamoto
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 2.796

7.  Evaluating the Implementation of the EndoTool Glycemic Control Software System.

Authors:  Samuel M John; Kacie Lauren Waters; Khatija Jivani
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2018-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.