Literature DB >> 23402594

Comparison of the effects of artificial and natural barriers on large African carnivores: implications for interspecific relationships and connectivity.

Gabriele Cozzi1, Femke Broekhuis, J Weldon McNutt, Bernhard Schmid.   

Abstract

1. Physical barriers contribute to habitat fragmentation, influence species distribution and ranging behaviour, and impact long-term population viability. Barrier permeability varies among species and can potentially impact the competitive balance within animal communities by differentially affecting co-occurring species. The influence of barriers on the spatial distribution of species within whole communities has nonetheless received little attention. 2. During a 4-year period, we studied the influence of a fence and rivers, two landscape features that potentially act as barriers on space use and ranging behaviour of lions Panthera leo, spotted hyenas Crocuta crocuta, African wild dogs Lycaon pictus and cheetahs Acinonyx jubatus in Northern Botswana. We compared the tendencies of these species to cross the barriers using data generated from GPS-radio collars fitted to a total of 35 individuals. Barrier permeability was inferred by calculating the number of times animals crossed a barrier vs. the number of times they did not cross. Finally, based on our results, we produced a map of connectivity for the broader landscape system. 3. Permeability varied significantly between fence and rivers and among species. The fence represented an obstacle for lions (permeability = 7.2%), while it was considerably more permeable for hyenas (35.6%) and wild dogs and cheetahs (≥ 50%). In contrast, the rivers and associated floodplains were relatively permeable to lions (14.4%) while they represented a nearly impassable obstacle for the other species (<2%). 4. The aversion of lions to cross the fence resulted in a relatively lion-free habitat patch on one side of the fence, which might provide a potential refuge for other species. For instance, the competitively inferior wild dogs used this refuge significantly more intensively than the side of the fence with a high presence of lions. 5. We showed that the influence of a barrier on the distribution of animals could potentially result in a broad-scale modification of community structure and ecology within a guild of co-occurring species. As habitat fragmentation increases, understanding the impact of barriers on species distributions is thus essential for the implementation of landscape-scale management strategies, the development and maintenance of corridors and the enhancement of connectivity.
© 2013 The Authors. Journal of Animal Ecology © 2013 British Ecological Society.

Entities:  

Keywords:  animal behaviour; coexistence; large carnivore guild; movement pattern; spatial distribution; spatial refuge; sympatric species

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23402594     DOI: 10.1111/1365-2656.12039

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  12 in total

Review 1.  Evaluating the potential for the environmentally sustainable control of foot and mouth disease in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Authors:  Kenneth J Ferguson; Sarah Cleaveland; Daniel Thomas Haydon; Alexandre Caron; Richard A Kock; Tiziana Lembo; J Grant C Hopcraft; Bertrand Chardonnet; Thomas Nyariki; Julius Keyyu; David James Paton; Fredrick Mathias Kivaria
Journal:  Ecohealth       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 3.184

2.  To kill, stay or flee: the effects of lions and landscape factors on habitat and kill site selection of cheetahs in South Africa.

Authors:  Susana Rostro-García; Jan F Kamler; Luke T B Hunter
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-02-18       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  Leopard (Panthera pardus) status, distribution, and the research efforts across its range.

Authors:  Andrew P Jacobson; Peter Gerngross; Joseph R Lemeris; Rebecca F Schoonover; Corey Anco; Christine Breitenmoser-Würsten; Sarah M Durant; Mohammad S Farhadinia; Philipp Henschel; Jan F Kamler; Alice Laguardia; Susana Rostro-García; Andrew B Stein; Luke Dollar
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-05-04       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Use of anthropogenic linear features by two medium-sized carnivores in reserved and agricultural landscapes.

Authors:  Georgina E Andersen; Christopher N Johnson; Leon A Barmuta; Menna E Jones
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Movement patterns of cheetahs (Acinonyx jubatus) in farmlands in Botswana.

Authors:  L K Van der Weyde; T Y Hubel; J Horgan; J Shotton; R McKenna; A M Wilson
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2017-01-15       Impact factor: 2.422

6.  Increasing game prices may alter farmers' behaviours towards leopards (Panthera pardus) and other carnivores in South Africa.

Authors:  Tara J Pirie; Rebecca L Thomas; Mark D E Fellowes
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Structural connectivity at a national scale: Wildlife corridors in Tanzania.

Authors:  Jason Riggio; Tim Caro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The genetic tale of a recovering lion population (Panthera leo) in the Savé Valley region (Zimbabwe): A better understanding of the history and managing the future.

Authors:  Laura Tensen; Rosemary J Groom; Joy Khuzwayo; Bettine Jansen van Vuuren
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Hidden Markov Models reveal a clear human footprint on the movements of highly mobile African wild dogs.

Authors:  Scott Creel; Johnathan Merkle; Thandiwe Mweetwa; Matthew S Becker; Henry Mwape; Twakundine Simpamba; Chuma Simukonda
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  A kingdom in decline: Holocene range contraction of the lion (Panthera leo) modelled with global environmental stratification.

Authors:  David M Cooper; Andrew J Dugmore; Andrew C Kitchener; Marc J Metzger; Antonio Trabucco
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2021-02-15       Impact factor: 2.984

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.