Literature DB >> 23402047

Some common indices of group diversity: upper boundaries.

Antonio Solanas1, Rejina M Selvam, José Navarro, David Leiva.   

Abstract

Workgroup diversity can be conceptualized as variety, separation, or disparity. Thus, the proper operationalization of diversity depends on how a diversity dimension has been defined. Analytically, the minimal diversity must be obtained when there are no differences on an attribute among the members of a group, however maximal diversity has a different shape for each conceptualization of diversity. Previous work on diversity indexes indicated maximum values for variety (e.g., Blau's index and Teachman's index), separation (e.g., standard deviation and mean Euclidean distance), and disparity (e.g., coefficient of variation and the Gini coefficient of concentration), although these maximum values are not valid for all group characteristics (i.e., group size and group size parity) and attribute scales (i.e., number of categories). We demonstrate analytically appropriate upper boundaries for conditional diversity determined by some specific group characteristics, avoiding the bias related to absolute diversity. This will allow applied researchers to make better interpretations regarding the relationship between group diversity and group outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23402047     DOI: 10.2466/01.09.21.PR0.111.6.777-796

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Rep        ISSN: 0033-2941


  1 in total

1.  The Role of Household Structure and Composition in Influencing Complementary Feeding Practices in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Asnake Ararsa Irenso; Dan Chamberlain; Miaobing Zheng; Karen J Campbell; Rachel Laws
Journal:  Nutrients       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 5.717

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.