Literature DB >> 2340187

Community attitudes toward public policies to control alcohol, tobacco, and high-fat food consumption.

R W Jeffery1, J L Forster, T L Schmid, C M McBride, B L Rooney, P L Pirie.   

Abstract

We report the results of a survey conducted in upper-midwestern communities to assess public attitudes toward policy level interventions to moderate the use of alcohol, tobacco, and high-fat food. Four hundred thirty-eight women and 383 men were asked to indicate how much they favored or did not favor 29 policy proposals. Results showed that regulatory controls in all three areas were favored by the general public. Support was strongest for alcohol and tobacco controls, less so for high-fat food. Interventions designed to protect children and youths were most strongly endorsed, followed by restrictions on advertising and direct control over conditions of sale. Women favored all interventions more than men. There was a strong positive association between age and support for measures to moderate alcohol use. Individuals reporting least personal use of alcohol, tobacco, and high-fat foods were most in favor of control policies. The results of this survey indicate specific measures that might be most readily enacted and what segments of the population are likely to be most and least receptive.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2340187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  12 in total

1.  Opinion leaders' support for tobacco control policies and participation in tobacco control activities.

Authors:  K A Howard; T Rogers; B Howard-Pitney; J A Flora; G J Norman; K M Ribisl
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 9.308

2.  Locking devices on cigarette vending machines: evaluation of a city ordinance.

Authors:  J L Forster; M E Hourigan; S Kelder
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Measuring support for tobacco control policy in selected areas of six countries.

Authors:  R G Laforge; W F Velicer; D A Levesque; J L Fava; D J Hill; P E Schofield; D Fan; H De Vries; W O Shisana; M Conner
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 7.552

4.  Policy as intervention: environmental and policy approaches to the prevention of cardiovascular disease.

Authors:  T L Schmid; M Pratt; E Howze
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  Smokers and non-smokers talk about regulatory options in tobacco control.

Authors:  Stacy M Carter; Simon Chapman
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 7.552

6.  The role of reported tobacco-specific media exposure on adult attitudes towards proposed policies to limit the portrayal of smoking in movies.

Authors:  Kelly D Blake; K Viswanath; Robert J Blendon; Donna Vallone
Journal:  Tob Control       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 7.552

7.  Do Longitudinal Trends in Tobacco 21-Related Media Coverage Correlate with Policy Support? an Exploratory Analysis Using Supervised and Unsupervised Machine Learning Methods.

Authors:  Leeann N Siegel; Allyson Volinsky Levin; Elissa C Kranzler; Laura A Gibson
Journal:  Health Commun       Date:  2020-09-08

8.  Awareness and support for anti-tobacco policies among health professional students in Pakistan: findings from the Global Health Professional Students Survey, 2011.

Authors:  Syeda Kanwal Aslam; Beenish Mehboob; Sidra Zaheer; Kashif Shafique
Journal:  Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy       Date:  2015-03-08

9.  Public opinion regarding earmarked cigarette tax in Taiwan.

Authors:  Yi-Wen Tsai; Lee-Lan Yen; Chung-Lin Yang; Pei-Fen Chen
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2003-12-24       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 10.  Public acceptability of government intervention to change health-related behaviours: a systematic review and narrative synthesis.

Authors:  Stephanie Diepeveen; Tom Ling; Marc Suhrcke; Martin Roland; Theresa M Marteau
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-08-15       Impact factor: 3.295

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.