Eric T Pierce1, Vikram Kumar, Hui Zheng, Robert A Peterfreund. 1. Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street Boston, MA 02114, USA. etpierce@partners.org
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gravity-driven micro-drip infusion sets allow control of medication dose delivery by adjusting drops per minute. When the roller clamp is fully open, flow in the drip chamber can be a continuous fluid column rather than discrete, countable, drops. We hypothesized that during this "wide-open" state, drug delivery becomes dependent on factors extrinsic to the micro-drip set and is therefore difficult to predict. We conducted laboratory experiments to characterize volume delivery under various clinically relevant conditions of wide-open flow in an in vitro laboratory model. METHODS: A micro-drip infusion set, plugged into a bag of normal saline, was connected to a high-flow stopcock at the distal end. Vertically oriented IV catheters (gauges 14-22) were connected to the stopcock. The fluid meniscus height in the bag was fixed (60-120 cm) above the outflow point. The roller clamp on the infusion set was in fully open position for all experiments resulting in a continuous column of fluid in the drip chamber. Fluid volume delivered in 1 minute was measured 4 times with each condition. To model resistive effects of carrier flow, volumetric infusion pumps were used to deliver various flow rates of normal saline through a carrier IV set into which a micro-drip infusion was "piggybacked." We also compared delivery by micro-drip infusion sets from 3 manufacturers. RESULTS: The volume of fluid delivered by gravity-driven infusion under wide-open conditions (continuous fluid column in drip chamber) varied 2.9-fold (95% confidence interval, 2.84-2.96) depending on catheter size and fluid column height. Total model resistance of the micro-drip with stopcock and catheter varied with flow rate. Volume delivered by the piggybacked micro-drip decreased up to 29.7% ± 0.8% (mean ± SE) as the carrier flow increased from 0 to 1998 mL/min. Delivery characteristics of the micro-drip infusion sets from 3 different manufacturers were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory simulation of clinical situations with gravity-driven micro-drip infusion sets under wide-open flow conditions revealed that infusion rate (drug and/or volume delivery) can vary widely depending on extrinsic factors including catheter size, fluid column height, and carrier flow. The variable resistance implies nonlaminar flow in the micro-drip model that cannot be easily predicted mathematically. These findings support the use of mechanical pumps instead of gravity-driven micro-drips to enhance the precision and safety of IV infusions, especially for vasoactive drugs.
BACKGROUND: Gravity-driven micro-drip infusion sets allow control of medication dose delivery by adjusting drops per minute. When the roller clamp is fully open, flow in the drip chamber can be a continuous fluid column rather than discrete, countable, drops. We hypothesized that during this "wide-open" state, drug delivery becomes dependent on factors extrinsic to the micro-drip set and is therefore difficult to predict. We conducted laboratory experiments to characterize volume delivery under various clinically relevant conditions of wide-open flow in an in vitro laboratory model. METHODS: A micro-drip infusion set, plugged into a bag of normal saline, was connected to a high-flow stopcock at the distal end. Vertically oriented IV catheters (gauges 14-22) were connected to the stopcock. The fluid meniscus height in the bag was fixed (60-120 cm) above the outflow point. The roller clamp on the infusion set was in fully open position for all experiments resulting in a continuous column of fluid in the drip chamber. Fluid volume delivered in 1 minute was measured 4 times with each condition. To model resistive effects of carrier flow, volumetric infusion pumps were used to deliver various flow rates of normal saline through a carrier IV set into which a micro-drip infusion was "piggybacked." We also compared delivery by micro-drip infusion sets from 3 manufacturers. RESULTS: The volume of fluid delivered by gravity-driven infusion under wide-open conditions (continuous fluid column in drip chamber) varied 2.9-fold (95% confidence interval, 2.84-2.96) depending on catheter size and fluid column height. Total model resistance of the micro-drip with stopcock and catheter varied with flow rate. Volume delivered by the piggybacked micro-drip decreased up to 29.7% ± 0.8% (mean ± SE) as the carrier flow increased from 0 to 1998 mL/min. Delivery characteristics of the micro-drip infusion sets from 3 different manufacturers were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Laboratory simulation of clinical situations with gravity-driven micro-drip infusion sets under wide-open flow conditions revealed that infusion rate (drug and/or volume delivery) can vary widely depending on extrinsic factors including catheter size, fluid column height, and carrier flow. The variable resistance implies nonlaminar flow in the micro-drip model that cannot be easily predicted mathematically. These findings support the use of mechanical pumps instead of gravity-driven micro-drips to enhance the precision and safety of IV infusions, especially for vasoactive drugs.
Authors: Elizabeth Abu-Haydar; David Katuntu; James Bauer; Alec Wollen; Mike Eisenstein; Jill Sherman-Konkle; Anthony Roche; Michael Ruffo Journal: Med Devices (Auckl) Date: 2021-06-24