PURPOSE: To image endogenous exchangeable proton signals in the human brain using a recently reported method called frequency labeled exchange transfer (FLEX) MRI. METHODS: As opposed to labeling exchangeable protons using saturation (i.e., chemical exchange saturation transfer, or CEST), FLEX labels exchangeable protons with their chemical shift evolution. The use of short high-power frequency pulses allows more efficient labeling of rapidly exchanging protons, while time domain acquisition allows removal of contamination from semi-solid magnetization transfer effects. RESULTS: FLEX-based exchangeable proton signals were detected in human brain over the 1-5 ppm frequency range from water. Conventional magnetization transfer contrast and the bulk water signal did not interfere in the FLEX spectrum. The information content of these signals differed from in vivo CEST data in that the average exchange rate of these signals was 350-400 s(-1) , much faster than the amide signal usually detected using direct saturation (∼30 s(-1) ). Similarly, fast exchanging protons could be detected in egg white in the same frequency range where amide and amine protons of mobile proteins and peptides are known to resonate. CONCLUSIONS: FLEX MRI in the human brain preferentially detects more rapidly exchanging amide/amine protons compared to traditional CEST experiments, thereby changing the information content of the exchangeable proton spectrum. This has the potential to open up different types of endogenous applications as well as more easy detection of rapidly exchanging protons in diaCEST agents or fast exchanging units such as water molecules in paracest agents without interference of conventional magnetization transfer contrast.
PURPOSE: To image endogenous exchangeable proton signals in the human brain using a recently reported method called frequency labeled exchange transfer (FLEX) MRI. METHODS: As opposed to labeling exchangeable protons using saturation (i.e., chemical exchange saturation transfer, or CEST), FLEX labels exchangeable protons with their chemical shift evolution. The use of short high-power frequency pulses allows more efficient labeling of rapidly exchanging protons, while time domain acquisition allows removal of contamination from semi-solid magnetization transfer effects. RESULTS: FLEX-based exchangeable proton signals were detected in human brain over the 1-5 ppm frequency range from water. Conventional magnetization transfer contrast and the bulk water signal did not interfere in the FLEX spectrum. The information content of these signals differed from in vivo CEST data in that the average exchange rate of these signals was 350-400 s(-1) , much faster than the amide signal usually detected using direct saturation (∼30 s(-1) ). Similarly, fast exchanging protons could be detected in egg white in the same frequency range where amide and amine protons of mobile proteins and peptides are known to resonate. CONCLUSIONS: FLEX MRI in the human brain preferentially detects more rapidly exchanging amide/amine protons compared to traditional CEST experiments, thereby changing the information content of the exchangeable proton spectrum. This has the potential to open up different types of endogenous applications as well as more easy detection of rapidly exchanging protons in diaCEST agents or fast exchanging units such as water molecules in paracest agents without interference of conventional magnetization transfer contrast.
Authors: Craig K Jones; Michael J Schlosser; Peter C M van Zijl; Martin G Pomper; Xavier Golay; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2006-09 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Craig K Jones; Daniel Polders; Jun Hua; He Zhu; Hans J Hoogduin; Jinyuan Zhou; Peter Luijten; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kannie W Y Chan; Michael T McMahon; Yoshinori Kato; Guanshu Liu; Jeff W M Bulte; Zaver M Bhujwalla; Dmitri Artemov; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-10-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Chien-Yuan Lin; Nirbhay N Yadav; Joshua I Friedman; James Ratnakar; A Dean Sherry; Peter C M van Zijl Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2012-01-27 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Kejia Cai; Mohammad Haris; Anup Singh; Feliks Kogan; Joel H Greenberg; Hari Hariharan; John A Detre; Ravinder Reddy Journal: Nat Med Date: 2012-01-22 Impact factor: 53.440
Authors: Lin Chen; Xiang Xu; Haifeng Zeng; Kannie W Y Chan; Nirbhay Yadav; Shuhui Cai; Kathryn J Schunke; Nauder Faraday; Peter C M van Zijl; Jiadi Xu Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-02-05 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Zheng Liu; Ivan E Dimitrov; Robert E Lenkinski; Asghar Hajibeigi; Elena Vinogradov Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2015-05-29 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Christian T Farrar; Jason S Buhrman; Guanshu Liu; Anne Kleijn; Martine L M Lamfers; Michael T McMahon; Assaf A Gilad; Giulia Fulci Journal: Radiology Date: 2015-02-13 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: Hye-Young Heo; Zheng Han; Shanshan Jiang; Michael Schär; Peter C M van Zijl; Jinyuan Zhou Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2019-01-14 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Xiaolei Song; Jiadi Xu; Shuli Xia; Nirbhay N Yadav; Bachchu Lal; John Laterra; Jeff W M Bulte; Peter C M van Zijl; Michael T McMahon Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2014-12-16 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Ouri Cohen; Shuning Huang; Michael T McMahon; Matthew S Rosen; Christian T Farrar Journal: Magn Reson Med Date: 2018-05-13 Impact factor: 4.668
Authors: Lin Chen; Haifeng Zeng; Xiang Xu; Nirbhay N Yadav; Shuhui Cai; Nicolaas A Puts; Peter B Barker; Tong Li; Robert G Weiss; Peter C M van Zijl; Jiadi Xu Journal: NMR Biomed Date: 2017-09-29 Impact factor: 4.044