Literature DB >> 23400833

Does removal of out-of-pocket costs for cervical and breast cancer screening work? A quasi-experimental study to evaluate the impact on attendance, attendance inequality and average cost per uptake of a Japanese government intervention.

Takahiro Tabuchi1, Takahiro Hoshino, Tomio Nakayama, Yuri Ito, Akiko Ioka, Isao Miyashiro, Hideaki Tsukuma.   

Abstract

Reducing out-of-pocket costs is known to improve mammography attendance, but an evidence gap remains concerning Pap smear testing. The Japanese government implemented a politically determined intervention to remove out-of-pocket costs for Pap smear tests and mammography attendance, costing US$148 million, in 2009. It targeted women when they reached the first year of a 5-year age group (i.e., 20, 25, 30 years) with the aim of reducing attendance inequality. Our objective is to evaluate the intervention in terms of uptake and average cost per uptake for cancer screening attendance and to assess socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening attendance pre- and postintervention. A quasi-experimental study utilizing national repeated cross sections, observed pre- and postintervention, which compared intervention and comparison groups by the Difference-in-Differences method, was conducted. Outcome measures were uptake of cancer screening attendance resulting from the intervention with average cost per uptake and broad inequality indicators for cancer screening attendance according to socioeconomic inequality. In total, 34,043 age-eligible, noninstitutionalized women were analyzed. Uptake among the overall population was 13.9% point in the age- and income-adjusted model for Pap smear and 9.8% point for mammography, with an average cost of US$139 per uptake. The intervention increased inequality indicators in Pap smear attendance (more than +100%) but decreased inequality in mammography attendance (ranging from -12.9 to -74.1%) within the intervention group. In conclusion, removing out-of-pocket costs improves female cancer screening uptake in Japan but may not be cost-saving. Although cost removal reduces inequalities in attendance for mammography, it appears to increase inequalities in Pap smear attendance.
Copyright © 2013 UICC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23400833     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.28095

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  12 in total

1.  Social Inequalities in Participation in Cervical Cancer Screening in a Metropolitan Area Implementing a Pilot Organised Screening Programme (Paris Region, France).

Authors:  Celine Audiger; Thomas Bovagnet; Julia Bardes; Gaelle Abihsera; Jerome Nicolet; Michel Deghaye; Audrey Bochaton; Gwenn Menvielle
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2022-07-04       Impact factor: 5.100

2.  Economics of Multicomponent Interventions to Increase Breast, Cervical, and Colorectal Cancer Screening: A Community Guide Systematic Review.

Authors:  Giridhar Mohan; Sajal K Chattopadhyay; Donatus U Ekwueme; Susan A Sabatino; Devon L Okasako-Schmucker; Yinan Peng; Shawna L Mercer; Anilkrishna B Thota
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 5.043

3.  Complete workplace indoor smoking ban and smoking behavior among male workers and female nonsmoking workers' husbands: a pseudo cohort study of Japanese public workers.

Authors:  Takahiro Tabuchi; Takahiro Hoshino; Hitomi Hama; Kayo Nakata-Yamada; Yuri Ito; Akiko Ioka; Tomio Nakayama; Isao Miyashiro; Hideaki Tsukuma
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-24       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 4.  Cancer control programs in East Asia: evidence from the international literature.

Authors:  Malcolm A Moore
Journal:  J Prev Med Public Health       Date:  2014-07-31

5.  Evaluation of a free-coupon program for cervical cancer screening among the young: a nationally funded program conducted by a local government in Japan.

Authors:  Yutaka Ueda; Tomotaka Sobue; Akiko Morimoto; Tomomi Egawa-Takata; Chie Hashizume; Hisayo Kishida; Satomi Okamoto; Kiyoshi Yoshino; Masami Fujita; Takayuki Enomoto; Yoshimi Tomine; Jun Fukuyoshi; Tadashi Kimura
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 3.211

6.  Assessment of trends in socioeconomic inequalities in cancer screening services in Korea, 1998-2012.

Authors:  Sujin Kim; Jongnam Hwang
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2016-02-24

7.  Does lack of resources impair access to breast and cervical cancer screening in Japan?

Authors:  Hiroshi Sano; Rei Goto; Chisato Hamashima
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-07-13       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Educational inequalities in smoking among Japanese adults aged 25-94 years: Nationally representative sex- and age-specific statistics.

Authors:  Takahiro Tabuchi; Naoki Kondo
Journal:  J Epidemiol       Date:  2017-01-27       Impact factor: 3.211

9.  Social inequalities in cervical cancer screening: a discrete choice experiment among French general practitioners and gynaecologists.

Authors:  Thibaut Raginel; Guillaume Grandazzi; Guy Launoy; Mélanie Trocmé; Véronique Christophe; Célia Berchi; Lydia Guittet
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Effectiveness of an Out-of-Pocket Cost Removal Intervention on Health Check Attendance in Japan.

Authors:  Hiroshi Murayama; Yuta Takahashi; Setaro Shimada
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.