BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE:Impoverished urban children suffer disproportionately from asthma and underuse preventive asthma medications. The objective of this study was to examine cost-effectiveness (CE) of the School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) program compared with usual care (UC). METHODS: The analysis was based on the SBAT trial, including 525 children aged 3 to 10 years attending urban preschool or elementary school who were randomized to eitherUC or administration of 1 dose of preventive asthma medicationat school by the school nurse each school day. The primary outcome was the mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs). The impact of the intervention on medical costs was estimated by using parent-reported child health services utilization data and average national reimbursement rates. We estimated the cost of running the program using wages for program staff. Productivity costs were estimated by using value of parent lost time due to child illness. CE of the SBAT program compared with UC was evaluated based on the incremental CE ratio. RESULTS: The health benefit of the intervention was equal to ∼158 SFD gained per each 30-day period (P < .05) per 100 children. The programmatic expenses summed to an extra $4822 per 100 children per month. The net saving due to the intervention (reduction in medical costs and parental productivity, and improvement in school attendance) was $3240, resulting in the incremental cost-savings difference of $1583 and CE of $10 per 1 extra SFD gained. CONCLUSIONS: The SBAT was effective and cost-effective in reducing symptoms in urban children with asthma compared with other existing programs.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Impoverished urban children suffer disproportionately from asthma and underuse preventive asthma medications. The objective of this study was to examine cost-effectiveness (CE) of the School-Based Asthma Therapy (SBAT) program compared with usual care (UC). METHODS: The analysis was based on the SBAT trial, including 525 children aged 3 to 10 years attending urban preschool or elementary school who were randomized to either UC or administration of 1 dose of preventive asthma medication at school by the school nurse each school day. The primary outcome was the mean number of symptom-free days (SFDs). The impact of the intervention on medical costs was estimated by using parent-reported child health services utilization data and average national reimbursement rates. We estimated the cost of running the program using wages for program staff. Productivity costs were estimated by using value of parent lost time due to child illness. CE of the SBAT program compared with UC was evaluated based on the incremental CE ratio. RESULTS: The health benefit of the intervention was equal to ∼158 SFD gained per each 30-day period (P < .05) per 100 children. The programmatic expenses summed to an extra $4822 per 100 children per month. The net saving due to the intervention (reduction in medical costs and parental productivity, and improvement in school attendance) was $3240, resulting in the incremental cost-savings difference of $1583 and CE of $10 per 1 extra SFD gained. CONCLUSIONS: The SBAT was effective and cost-effective in reducing symptoms in urban children with asthma compared with other existing programs.
Authors: Meyer Kattan; Sally C Stearns; Ellen F Crain; James W Stout; Peter J Gergen; Richard Evans; Cynthia M Visness; Rebecca S Gruchalla; Wayne J Morgan; George T O'Connor; J Patrick Mastin; Herman E Mitchell Journal: J Allergy Clin Immunol Date: 2005-10-03 Impact factor: 10.793
Authors: Jill S Halterman; Peter G Szilagyi; Susan G Fisher; Maria Fagnano; Paul Tremblay; Kelly M Conn; Hongyue Wang; Belinda Borrelli Journal: Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med Date: 2011-03
Authors: Lynn B Gerald; Leslie A McClure; Joan M Mangan; Kathy F Harrington; Linda Gibson; Sue Erwin; Jody Atchison; Roni Grad Journal: Pediatrics Date: 2009-02 Impact factor: 7.124
Authors: George A Mensah; Catherine M Stoney; Michelle M Freemer; Sharon Smith; Michael M Engelgau; W Keith Hoots; James P Kiley; David C Goff Journal: Ethn Dis Date: 2019-02-21 Impact factor: 1.847
Authors: Andrew F Beck; Bin Huang; Katherine A Auger; Patrick H Ryan; Chen Chen; Robert S Kahn Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2016-07-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Ann W Garwick; Erla Kolbrun Svavarsdóttir; Ann M Seppelt; Wendy S Looman; Lori S Anderson; Brynja Örlygsdóttir Journal: J Adv Nurs Date: 2014-09-16 Impact factor: 3.187
Authors: Christina Crabtree-Ide; Denise F Lillvis; Jing Nie; Maria Fagnano; Reynaldo S Tajon; Paul Tremblay; Jill S Halterman; Katia Noyes Journal: Popul Health Manag Date: 2021-05-14 Impact factor: 2.459