Literature DB >> 23398815

Direct cost of management and treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus and its flares in Spain: the LUCIE Study.

R Cervera1, I Rúa-Figueroa, A Gil-Aguado, J M Sabio, L Pallarés, L J Hernández-Pastor, M Iglesias.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: The cost of control and management of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) in Spain is unknown. This study has aimed to describe the healthcare resources associated to control and treatment of LES and its flares and to estimate the associated direct costs. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a European, multicentric, retrospective study (2008-2010) carried out with the participation of 5 hospitals in Spain with experience in SLE. Adult SLE patients (ACR criteria), with positive auto-antibodies (ANA and/or anti-ds-DNA) and active disease were included. Patients were stratified into severe and non-severe SLE. Direct healthcare costs were estimated with resources used and their unit costs.
RESULTS: Seventy-five out of 79 SLE patients were analyzed. Of these, 52% had severe disease, 91.9% were females and 90.7% were Caucasian. Mean (SD) age was 41.0 (14.5) years. Annual direct cost per patient related to SLE management was €5,968 (7,038) and €3,604 (5,159) for severe and non-severe patients, respectively (P=.002). Costs related to hospitalizations, pharmacological treatment, visits to specialists, and laboratory tests were higher for patients with severe disease. At least one flare during the observation period was present in 90.7% of patients. Severe flares were a significant predictor of increase in cost.
CONCLUSIONS: The cost associated with SLE control and treatment is higher for severe SLE patients. Insufficient control of the disease activity results in an increase in flares. Its presence is related to an increase in costs, hospitalization being the major component.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier España, S.L. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23398815     DOI: 10.1016/j.rce.2012.11.018

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Clin Esp (Barc)        ISSN: 2254-8874


  6 in total

1.  Health-related quality of life in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: a Spanish study based on patient reports.

Authors:  J A Román Ivorra; N Fernández-Llanio-Comella; A San-Martín-Álvarez; P Vela-Casasempere; I Saurí-Ferrer; S González-de-Julián; D Vivas-Consuelo
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  Impact of Climate Change on Eye Diseases and Associated Economical Costs.

Authors:  Lucía Echevarría-Lucas; José Mᵃ Senciales-González; María Eloísa Medialdea-Hurtado; Jesús Rodrigo-Comino
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-07-05       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Lupus Erythematosus Quality of Life Questionnaire (LEQoL): Development and Psychometric Properties.

Authors:  Elena Castellano-Rioja; María Del Carmen Giménez-Espert; Ana Soto-Rubio
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2020-11-20       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Associations of metabolic syndrome in SLE.

Authors:  Diane Apostolopoulos; Fabien Vincent; Alberta Hoi; Eric Morand
Journal:  Lupus Sci Med       Date:  2020-11

5.  Budget Impact Analysis Of Subcutaneous Belimumab In Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus In Spain.

Authors:  Maria Cevey; Jaime Calvo-Alén; Carlos Crespo; Angel Robles-Marhuenda; Lee Smolen; Josefina Cortés-Hernández
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2019-12-05

6.  Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a multicomponent intervention to implement a clinical practice guideline for systemic lupus erythematosus: protocol for a cluster-randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  María M Trujillo-Martín; Yolanda Ramallo-Fariña; Tasmania Del Pino-Sedeño; Íñigo Rúa-Figueroa; Elisa Trujillo-Martín; Laura Vallejo-Torres; Iñaki Imaz-Iglesia; Ricardo Sánchez-de-Madariaga; Ana M de Pascual-Medina; Pedro Serrano-Aguilar
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.