Literature DB >> 23398580

Faces and awareness: low-level, not emotional factors determine perceptual dominance.

Katie L H Gray1, Wendy J Adams, Nicholas Hedger, Kristiana E Newton, Matthew Garner.   

Abstract

Threat-relevant stimuli such as fear faces are prioritized by the human visual system. Recent research suggests that this prioritization begins during unconscious processing: A specialized (possibly subcortical) pathway evaluates the threat relevance of visual input, resulting in preferential access to awareness for threat stimuli. Our data challenge this claim. We used a continuous flash suppression (CFS) paradigm to present emotional face stimuli outside of awareness. It has been shown using CFS that salient (e.g., high contrast) and recognizable stimuli (faces, words) become visible more quickly than less salient or less recognizable stimuli. We found that although fearful faces emerge from suppression faster than other faces, this was wholly explained by their low-level visual properties, rather than their emotional content. We conclude that, in the competition for visual awareness, the visual system prefers and promotes unconscious stimuli that are more "face-like," but the emotional content of a face has no effect on stimulus salience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23398580     DOI: 10.1037/a0031403

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  31 in total

1.  Unconscious processing of facial expression as revealed by affective priming under continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-12

2.  Enhanced conscious processing and blindsight-like detection of fear-conditioned stimuli under continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Joana B Vieira; Sophia Wen; Lindsay D Oliver; Derek G V Mitchell
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-08-16       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Training Affective Computer Vision Models by Crowdsourcing Soft-Target Labels.

Authors:  Peter Washington; Haik Kalantarian; Jack Kent; Arman Husic; Aaron Kline; Emilie Leblanc; Cathy Hou; Cezmi Mutlu; Kaitlyn Dunlap; Yordan Penev; Nate Stockham; Brianna Chrisman; Kelley Paskov; Jae-Yoon Jung; Catalin Voss; Nick Haber; Dennis P Wall
Journal:  Cognit Comput       Date:  2021-09-27       Impact factor: 4.890

4.  Gaze direction and face orientation modulate perceptual sensitivity to faces under interocular suppression.

Authors:  Renzo C Lanfranco; Timo Stein; Hugh Rabagliati; David Carmel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-10       Impact factor: 4.996

5.  Unconscious Psychological Treatments for Physiological Survival Circuits.

Authors:  Vincent Taschereau-Dumouchel; Ka-Yuet Liu; Hakwan Lau
Journal:  Curr Opin Behav Sci       Date:  2018-05-04

6.  "Speak of the Devil… and he Shall Appear": Religiosity, Unconsciousness, and the Effects of Explicit Priming in the Misperception of Immorality.

Authors:  Myron Tsikandilakis; Man Qing Leong; Zhaoliang Yu; Georgios Paterakis; Persefoni Bali; Jan Derrfuss; Pierre-Alexis Mevel; Alison Milbank; Eddie M W Tong; Christopher Madan; Peter Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2021-01-23

7.  Unpredictive linguistic verbal cues accelerate congruent visual targets into awareness in a breaking continuous flash suppression paradigm.

Authors:  Chris L E Paffen; Andre Sahakian; Marijn E Struiksma; Stefan Van der Stigchel
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 8.  Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield.

Authors:  Surya Gayet; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Chris L E Paffen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-23

Review 9.  Sustained invisibility through crowding and continuous flash suppression: a comparative review.

Authors:  Nathan Faivre; Vincent Berthet; Sid Kouider
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-27

10.  Exposure is not enough: suppressing stimuli from awareness can abolish the mere exposure effect.

Authors:  Daniel de Zilva; Luke Vu; Ben R Newell; Joel Pearson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.