Literature DB >> 23398280

Preoperative staging of endometrial cancer using TVS, MRI, and hysteroscopy.

Gitte Ørtoft1, Margit Dueholm, Ole Mathiesen, Estrid S Hansen, Erik Lundorf, Charlotte Møller, Edvard Marinovskij, Lone K Petersen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of different preoperative modalities for staging of endometrial cancer to restrict extensive surgery to patients at high risk of metastatic disease.
SETTING: Aarhus University Hospital. POPULATION: 156 women referred in 2006-2011 because of atypical endometrial hyperplasia (G0) or endometrial cancer.
METHODS: Patients were offered preoperative transvaginal ultrasonography (TVS), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and hysteroscopic-directed biopsies from the uterine tumor and cervix. Final pathology of the removed uterus was the reference standard. Patients were divided into low risk (<50% myometrial invasion, and grades 0, 1, 2, and no cervical invasion) or high risk (all others). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive/negative predictive value.
RESULTS: Patients were aged 32-88 years, with a mean body mass index of 29. At final pathology 81% had cancer and 19% G0 or no residual tumor; 54% were high risk. Hysteroscopy-directed biopsies had a higher accuracy (92%) than endometrial biopsy (58%) for differentiating G0 from cancer (p < 0.001); grade 3 tumor identification had similar accuracy (93 vs. 92%). Deep myometrial invasion was estimated with higher accuracy by MRI (82%) than TVS (74%) (p < 0.02). For cervical involvement, hysteroscopy-directed biopsies had higher accuracy (94%) than MRI (84%,) and TVS (80%) (p < 0.02). Accuracy for identifying high-risk women was highest (83%) using a combination of MRI and hysteroscopic-directed biopsies, compared with TVS and endometrial biopsy (72%) (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSION: Preoperative staging with MRI and hysteroscopy-directed biopsy can identify eight of 10 women with high risk of lymph node metastases and spare eight of 10 low-risk women extended surgery.
© 2013 The Authors Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica © 2013 Nordic Federation of Societies of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23398280     DOI: 10.1111/aogs.12103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand        ISSN: 0001-6349            Impact factor:   3.636


  15 in total

Review 1.  Ultrasound in gynecological cancer: is it time for re-evaluation of its uses?

Authors:  Daniela Fischerova; David Cibula
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 2.  MRI of endometrium cancer - how we do it.

Authors:  Matthias Meissnitzer; Rosemarie Forstner
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2016-05-09       Impact factor: 3.909

3.  Are preoperative histology and MRI useful for classification of endometrial cancer risk?

Authors:  Noemie Body; Vincent Lavoué; Olivier De Kerdaniel; Fabrice Foucher; Sébastien Henno; Aurélie Cauchois; Bruno Laviolle; Marc Leblanc; Jean Levêque
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-19       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  The Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in Assessment of Myometrial Invasion in Endometrial Cancer: Subjective Assessment versus Objective Techniques.

Authors:  Filip Frühauf; Michal Zikan; Ivana Semeradova; Pavel Dundr; Kristyna Nemejcova; Ladislav Dusek; David Cibula; Daniela Fischerova
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2017-07-24       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Diagnostic Value of Assessment of Cervical Involvement in Early-Stage Endometrial Adenocarcinoma: Comparison of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) Versus Hysteroscopy.

Authors:  Guocai Xu; Dongyan Wang; Xiaoting Ling; Huaiwu Lu; Rongchun Lin; Yuanyuan Shi; Bingzhong Zhang
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2018-11-06

6.  Survival and recurrence in stage II endometrial cancers in relation to uterine risk stratification after introduction of lymph node resection and omission of postoperative radiotherapy: a Danish Gynecological Cancer Group Study.

Authors:  Gitte Ørtoft; Claus Høgdall; Estrid S Hansen; Margit Dueholm
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.401

Review 7.  Circulating Cell-Free DNA or Circulating Tumor DNA in the Management of Ovarian and Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Qian Chen; Zi-Han Zhang; Shu Wang; Jing-He Lang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 8.  The Complementary Role of Imaging and Tumor Biomarkerszzm321990in Gynecological Cancers: An Update of the Literature

Authors:  Emanuela Anastasi; Silvia Gigli; Laura Ballesio; Antonio Angeloni; Lucia Manganaro
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2018-02-26

9.  Preoperative imaging markers and PDZ-binding kinase tissue expression predict low-risk disease in endometrial hyperplasias and low grade cancers.

Authors:  Ingfrid S Haldorsen; Camilla Krakstad; Anna Berg; Ankush Gulati; Sigmund Ytre-Hauge; Kristine E Fasmer; Karen K Mauland; Erling A Hoivik; Jenny A Husby; Ingvild L Tangen; Jone Trovik; Mari K Halle; Ingunn Stefansson; Lars A Akslen; Kathrine Woie; Line Bjørge; Helga B Salvesen; Øyvind O Salvesen; Henrica M J Werner
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-07-31

10.  Baseline Serum HE4 But Not Tissue HE4 Expression Predicts Response to the Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System in Atypical Hyperplasia and Early Stage Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Roya Behrouzi; Neil A J Ryan; Chloe E Barr; Abigail E Derbyshire; Y Louise Wan; Zoe Maskell; Katie Stocking; Philip W Pemberton; James Bolton; Rhona J McVey; Emma J Crosbie
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-01-23       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.