Literature DB >> 23398186

The red-attractiveness effect, applying the Ioannidis and Trikalinos (2007b) test, and the broader scientific context: a reply to Francis (2013).

Andrew J Elliot1, Markus A Maier2.   

Abstract

Francis (2013) tested for and found evidence of publication bias in 1 of the 3 focal relations examined in Elliot et al. (2010), that between red and attractiveness. He then called into question the research as a whole and the field of experimental psychology more generally. Our reply has 3 foci. First, we attend to the bottom line regarding the red-attractiveness effect; it has already been replicated and extended by several independent laboratories. Second, we note that the test applied to our research is an exploratory test meant to be used cautiously and highlight ways in which the application to our research seems incautious. Third, we place the critique in the broader context of the prevailing norms and practices of the field and suggest that the preferred approach to reevaluating and revising the system currently in place is the frank, creative exchange of ideas already underway. 2013 APA, all rights reserved

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23398186     DOI: 10.1037/a0029592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen        ISSN: 0022-1015


  3 in total

1.  Do Red and Blue Uniforms Matter in Football and Handball Penalties?

Authors:  Bjoern Krenn; Niklas Pernhaupt; Markus Handsteiner
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

2.  Men in red: A reexamination of the red-attractiveness effect.

Authors:  Vera M Hesslinger; Lisa Goldbach; Claus-Christian Carbon
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2015-08

Review 3.  Implications of "Too Good to Be True" for Replication, Theoretical Claims, and Experimental Design: An Example Using Prominent Studies of Racial Bias.

Authors:  Gregory Francis
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-09-22
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.