Literature DB >> 23397941

Implants placed in the nasopalatine canal to rehabilitate severely atrophic maxillae: a retrospective study with long follow-up.

David Peñarrocha1, Eugenia Candel, Jose Luis Calvo Guirado, Luigi Canullo, Maria Peñarrocha.   

Abstract

To assess the survival rate of implants placed in the nasopalatine canal for the rehabilitation of patients with atrophic maxillae and the level of satisfaction of these patients. A retrospective study was performed between 2000 and 2009 of patients with severe atrophy of edentulous maxillae (Cawood and Howell's class V) rehabilitated with implant-supported prostheses with 1 implant placed in the nasopalatine canal. A preoperative computed tomography scan was obtained of all patients and all surgeries were performed by the same surgeon. The following parameters were assessed: neurosensory status of the anterior palate (using the pointed/blunt discrimination method); implant success rate according to criteria described by Albrektsson et al; patient satisfaction with the prosthetic treatment (using visual analogue scales). Thirteen patients with a mean age of 54.8 years were treated, 5 men and 8 women. Seventy-eight implants were placed: 13 in the nasopalatine canal, 6 in the zygomatic bone, 12 in the pterygomaxillary region, 2 in the frontomaxillary buttress and 45 in other locations. Six patients reported a slight decrease in sensitivity in the anterior palate after surgery, which disappeared in all cases within a few weeks. Two early failures (before prosthetic loading) and no late failures (after prosthetic loading) of nasopalatine implants were recorded, yielding a success rate for these implants of 84.6% after a mean follow-up of 70 months (range 24 to 132 months. High patient satisfaction with the prosthetic restoration was generally achieved in terms of comfort, stability, function, esthetics, and ease of cleaning. Residual bone is associated with the nasopalatine canal, even in patients with severe maxillary atrophy. This canal may be considered a possible location for an anterior implant when rehabilitating atrophic patients using implant-supported prostheses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  dental implants; maxillary atrophy; nasopalatine canal

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2014        PMID: 23397941     DOI: 10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-12-00145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Oral Implantol        ISSN: 0160-6972            Impact factor:   1.779


  7 in total

1.  What is the best position for palatal implants? A CBCT study on bone volume in the growing maxilla.

Authors:  Darafsch Kawa; Martin Kunkel; Lothar Heuser; Britta A Jung
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-08-01       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Evaluation of morphology of the nasopalatine canal using cone-beam computed tomography in a subgroup of Turkish adult population.

Authors:  Ceyda Özçakır-Tomruk; Semanur Dölekoğlu; Zeynep Özkurt-Kayahan; Dilhan İlgüy
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 1.246

Review 3.  Nanostructured guidance for peripheral nerve injuries: a review with a perspective in the oral and maxillofacial area.

Authors:  Stefano Sivolella; Giulia Brunello; Nadia Ferrarese; Alessandro Della Puppa; Domenico D'Avella; Eriberto Bressan; Barbara Zavan
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2014-02-20       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  Morphological Characteristics of the Nasopalatine Canal and the Relationship with the Anterior Maxillary Bone-A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Pavle Milanovic; Dragica Selakovic; Milica Vasiljevic; Nemanja U Jovicic; Dragan Milovanović; Miroslav Vasovic; Gvozden Rosic
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-20

5.  Relationship of central incisor implant placement to the ridge configuration anterior to the nasopalatine canal in dentate and partially edentulous individuals: a comparative study.

Authors:  Xueting Jia; Wenjie Hu; Huanxin Meng
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-11-03       Impact factor: 2.984

Review 6.  The Incisive Canal: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  Sasha Lake; Joe Iwanaga; Shogo Kikuta; Rod J Oskouian; Marios Loukas; R Shane Tubbs
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-07-30

7.  Immediate Implant Placement in the Maxillary Aesthetic Zone: A Cone Beam Computed Tomography Study.

Authors:  Anna Botermans; Anna Lidén; Vinícius de Carvalho Machado; Bruno Ramos Chrcanovic
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 4.241

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.