Literature DB >> 23397798

Homosexuality as a consequence of epigenetically canalized sexual development.

William R Rice1, Urban Friberg, Sergey Gavrilets.   

Abstract

Male and female homosexuality have substantial prevalence in humans. Pedigree and twin studies indicate that homosexuality has substantial heritability in both sexes, yet concordance between identical twins is low and molecular studies have failed to find associated DNA makers. This paradoxical pattern calls for an explanation. We use published data on fetal androgen signaling and gene regulation via nongenetic changes in DNA packaging (epigenetics) to develop a new model for homosexuality. It is well established that fetal androgen signaling strongly influences sexual development. We show that an unappreciated feature of this process is reduced androgen sensitivity in XX fetuses and enhanced sensitivity in XY fetuses, and that this difference is most feasibly mused by numerous sex-specific epigenetic modifications ("epi-marks") originating in embryonic stem cells. These epi-marks buffer XX fetuses from masculinization due to excess fetal androgen exposure and similarly buffer XY fetuses from androgen underexposure. Extant data indicates that individual epi-marks influence some but not other sexually dimorphic traits, vary in strength across individuals, and are produced during ontogeny and erased between generations. Those that escape erasure will steer development of the sexual phenotypes they influence in a gonad-discordant direction in opposite sex offspring, mosaically feminizing XY offspring and masculinizing XX offspring. Such sex-specific epi-marks are sexually antagonistic (SA-epi-marks) because they canalize sexual development in the parent that produced them, but contribute to gonad-trait discordances in opposite-sex offspring when unerased. In this model, homosexuality occurs when stronger-than-average SA-epi-marks (influencing sexual preference) from an opposite-sex parent escape erasure and are then paired with a weaker-than-average de novo sex-specific epi-marks produced in opposite-sex offspring. Our model predicts that homosexuality is part of a wider phenomenon in which recently evolved androgen-influenced traits commonly display gonad-trait discordances at substantial frequency, and that the molecular feature underlying most homosexuality is not DNA polymorphism(s), but epi-marks that evolved to canalize sexual dimorphic development that sometimes carryover across generations and contribute to gonad-trait discordances in opposite-sex descendants.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23397798     DOI: 10.1086/668167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q Rev Biol        ISSN: 0033-5770            Impact factor:   4.875


  15 in total

Review 1.  Is sexual conflict an "engine of speciation"?

Authors:  Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-11-13       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Human homosexuality: a paradigmatic arena for sexually antagonistic selection?

Authors:  Andrea Camperio Ciani; Umberto Battaglia; Giovanni Zanzotto
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-01-29       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Fraternal birth order effect on sexual orientation explained.

Authors:  Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  An alternative hypothesis for the evolution of same-sex sexual behaviour in animals.

Authors:  Julia D Monk; Erin Giglio; Ambika Kamath; Max R Lambert; Caitlin E McDonough
Journal:  Nat Ecol Evol       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 15.460

5.  A test of genetic models for the evolutionary maintenance of same-sex sexual behaviour.

Authors:  Jessica L Hoskins; Michael G Ritchie; Nathan W Bailey
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-06-22       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 6.  Neurobiology of gender identity and sexual orientation.

Authors:  C E Roselli
Journal:  J Neuroendocrinol       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 3.627

Review 7.  Sex differences in partner preferences in humans and animals.

Authors:  Jacques Balthazart
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 8.  Genomic conflicts and sexual antagonism in human health: insights from oxytocin and testosterone.

Authors:  Mikael Mokkonen; Bernard J Crespi
Journal:  Evol Appl       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 5.183

9.  Brave New Love: The Threat of High-Tech "Conversion" Therapy and the Bio-Oppression of Sexual Minorities.

Authors:  Brian D Earp; Anders Sandberg; Julian Savulescu
Journal:  AJOB Neurosci       Date:  2014-01

10.  Homosexuality via canalized sexual development: a testing protocol for a new epigenetic model.

Authors:  William R Rice; Urban Friberg; Sergey Gavrilets
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 4.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.