| Literature DB >> 23397430 |
Shannon Portillo1, Danielle Rudes, Jill Viglione, Matthew Nelson, Faye Taxman.
Abstract
In problem-solving courts judges are no longer neutral arbitrators in adversarial justice processes. Instead, judges directly engage with court participants. The movement towards problem-solving court models emerges from a collaborative therapeutic jurisprudence framework. While most scholars argue judges are the central courtroom actors within problem-solving courts, we find judges are the stars front-stage, but play a more supporting role backstage. We use Goffman's front-stage-backstage framework to analyze 350 hours of ethnographic fieldwork within five problem-solving courts. Problem-solving courts are collaborative organizations with shifting leadership, based on forum. Understanding how the roles of courtroom workgroup actors adapt under the new court model is foundational for effective implementation of these justice processes.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23397430 PMCID: PMC3564654 DOI: 10.1080/15564886.2012.685220
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vict Offender ISSN: 1556-4886