Literature DB >> 23397283

The detection of ESR1/PGR/ERBB2 mRNA levels by RT-QPCR: a better approach for subtyping breast cancer and predicting prognosis.

Xin Du1, Xiao-Qing Li, Lin Li, Yuan-Yuan Xu, Yu-Mei Feng.   

Abstract

The molecular classification of breast cancer mainly focuses on ER, PR, and HER2 status detected by immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. To explore the clinical value of breast cancer classification based on gene-based diagnosis of the triple markers, we measured ESR1, PGR, and ERBB2 mRNA levels in 294 breast cancer patients by reverse transcription quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RT-QPCR), and examined their correlation with ER, PR, and HER2 status detected by IHC. We observed a significant positive correlation between the mRNA levels of the triple markers and their protein status (ESR1 vs. ER, Spearman's ρ = 0.527, P = 2.3 × 10(-22); PGR vs. PR, Spearman's ρ = 0.631, P = 5.1 × 10(-34); ERBB2 vs. HER2, Spearman's ρ = 0.439, P = 3.0 × 10(-15)). Furthermore, the subtypes determined by mRNA levels of the triple markers were significantly correlated to the subtypes determined based on their protein status (Spearman's ρ = 0.342, P = 2.0 × 10(-8)). Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the subtypes determined by mRNA levels of the triple-marker could predict the disease-free survival (DFS) in breast cancer patients. Multivariate analysis showed that the predictive value of DFS could be confirmed for the subtypes determined by mRNA levels of the triple markers (HR = 2.285, P = 0.008) but not for those determined by their protein status. Taken together, our results suggest that the detection of ESR1/PGR/ERBB2 mRNA levels by RT-QPCR is a better approach for subtyping breast cancer and predicting the prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397283     DOI: 10.1007/s10549-013-2432-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  11 in total

1.  Sex Differences in Plasmacytoid Dendritic Cell Levels of IRF5 Drive Higher IFN-α Production in Women.

Authors:  Morgane Griesbeck; Susanne Ziegler; Sophie Laffont; Nikaïa Smith; Lise Chauveau; Phillip Tomezsko; Armon Sharei; Georgio Kourjian; Filippos Porichis; Meghan Hart; Christine D Palmer; Michael Sirignano; Claudia Beisel; Heike Hildebrandt; Claire Cénac; Alexandra-Chloé Villani; Thomas J Diefenbach; Sylvie Le Gall; Olivier Schwartz; Jean-Philippe Herbeuval; Brigitte Autran; Jean-Charles Guéry; J Judy Chang; Marcus Altfeld
Journal:  J Immunol       Date:  2015-10-30       Impact factor: 5.422

2.  The challenge of triple negative breast cancers.

Authors:  Kannan Vaidyanathan
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2014-06-14

3.  Pharmacodynamic imaging guides dosing of a selective estrogen receptor degrader.

Authors:  Pedram Heidari; Francis Deng; Shadi A Esfahani; Alicia K Leece; Timothy M Shoup; Neil Vasdev; Umar Mahmood
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2015-01-21       Impact factor: 12.531

4.  ESR1 and PGR polymorphisms are associated with estrogen and progesterone receptor expression in breast tumors.

Authors:  Daniel L Hertz; N Lynn Henry; Kelley M Kidwell; Dafydd Thomas; Audrey Goddard; Faouzi Azzouz; Kelly Speth; Lang Li; Mousumi Banerjee; Jacklyn N Thibert; Celina G Kleer; Vered Stearns; Daniel F Hayes; Todd C Skaar; James M Rae
Journal:  Physiol Genomics       Date:  2016-08-19       Impact factor: 3.107

5.  Identifying Etiologically Distinct Sub-Types of Cancer: A Demonstration Project Involving Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Colin B Begg; Irene Orlow; Emily C Zabor; Arshi Arora; Ajay Sharma; Venkatraman E Seshan; Jonine L Bernstein
Journal:  Cancer Med       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 4.452

6.  Cancer-associated fibroblasts induce epithelial-mesenchymal transition of breast cancer cells through paracrine TGF-β signalling.

Authors:  Y Yu; C-H Xiao; L-D Tan; Q-S Wang; X-Q Li; Y-M Feng
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2013-12-12       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  Development of a robust RNA-based classifier to accurately determine ER, PR, and HER2 status in breast cancer clinical samples.

Authors:  Timothy R Wilson; Yuanyuan Xiao; Jill M Spoerke; Jane Fridlyand; Hartmut Koeppen; Eloisa Fuentes; Ling Y Huw; Ilma Abbas; Arjan Gower; Erica B Schleifman; Rupal Desai; Ling Fu; Teiko Sumiyoshi; Joyce A O'Shaughnessy; Garret M Hampton; Mark R Lackner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2014-10-22       Impact factor: 4.872

8.  Breast cancer cells obtain an osteomimetic feature via epithelial-mesenchymal transition that have undergone BMP2/RUNX2 signaling pathway induction.

Authors:  Cong-Cong Tan; Gui-Xi Li; Li-Duan Tan; Xin Du; Xiao-Qing Li; Rui He; Qing-Shan Wang; Yu-Mei Feng
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2016-11-29

9.  Serum deprivation response inhibits breast cancer progression by blocking transforming growth factor-β signaling.

Authors:  Yao Tian; Yue Yu; Li-Kun Hou; Jiang-Rui Chi; Jie-Fei Mao; Li Xia; Xin Wang; Ping Wang; Xu-Chen Cao
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2016-02-13       Impact factor: 6.716

10.  Anti-Inflammatory Effects of a Methanol Extract from the Marine Sponge Geodia cydonium on the Human Breast Cancer MCF-7 Cell Line.

Authors:  Susan Costantini; Giovanna Romano; Fabiola Rusolo; Francesca Capone; Eliana Guerriero; Giovanni Colonna; Adrianna Ianora; Gennaro Ciliberto; Maria Costantini
Journal:  Mediators Inflamm       Date:  2015-09-27       Impact factor: 4.711

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.