Literature DB >> 23397270

Effects of slice thickness and head rotation when measuring glioma sizes on MRI: in support of volume segmentation versus two largest diameters methods.

Pierre Schmitt1, Emmanuel Mandonnet, Adrien Perdreau, Elsa D Angelini.   

Abstract

This paper presents a study of the effects of scanning parameters variability when assessing glioma sizes on MRI. A database of lesions of various shapes and sizes, segmented on 3D-SPGR MRI images, was acquired on 65 patients with low-grade glioma. Simulations of large slice thickness and patient's head rotation were performed, allowing us to study their influence on two size indices: the bi-dimensional diameter product index (computed with the two largest diameters method) and the equivalent diameter index (computed with the volume segmentation method). Results show that thick slices and axial plane rotation can induce average (maximal) uncertainties on the bi-dimensional diameter product index between 32 and 6 % (150 %) for small and large tumors (size range 0.5-286 ml). The uncertainty on the equivalent diameter index, for the same categories of tumors, drops below 8 and 0.1 % (23 %). This study shows that the volume segmentation method is subject to less variability inherent to scanning conditions compared to the two largest diameters method. It also emphasizes the need for strict clinical guidelines on the replication of scanning conditions when performing MRI follow-ups on patients harboring small tumors. These implications await confirmation on a series of real patients being re-scanned with FLAIR MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397270     DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1051-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurooncol        ISSN: 0167-594X            Impact factor:   4.130


  19 in total

1.  Comparison of diameter and perimeter methods for tumor volume calculation.

Authors:  A G Sorensen; S Patel; C Harmath; S Bridges; J Synnott; A Sievers; Y H Yoon; E J Lee; M C Yang; R F Lewis; G J Harris; M Lev; P W Schaefer; B R Buchbinder; G Barest; K Yamada; J Ponzo; H Y Kwon; J Gemmete; J Farkas; A L Tievsky; R B Ziegler; M R Salhus; R Weisskoff
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2001-01-15       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Automatic alignment of brain MR scout scans using data-adaptive multi-structural model.

Authors:  Ting Chen; Yiqiang Zhan; Shaoting Zhang; Maneesh Dewan
Journal:  Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv       Date:  2011

3.  Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group.

Authors:  Patrick Y Wen; David R Macdonald; David A Reardon; Timothy F Cloughesy; A Gregory Sorensen; Evanthia Galanis; John Degroot; Wolfgang Wick; Mark R Gilbert; Andrew B Lassman; Christina Tsien; Tom Mikkelsen; Eric T Wong; Marc C Chamberlain; Roger Stupp; Kathleen R Lamborn; Michael A Vogelbaum; Martin J van den Bent; Susan M Chang
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-15       Impact factor: 44.544

Review 4.  Computational modeling of the WHO grade II glioma dynamics: principles and applications to management paradigm.

Authors:  Emmanuel Mandonnet; Johan Pallud; Olivier Clatz; Luc Taillandier; Ender Konukoglu; Hugues Duffau; Laurent Capelle
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2008-02-26       Impact factor: 3.042

5.  An MRI digital brain phantom for validation of segmentation methods.

Authors:  Bruno Alfano; Marco Comerci; Michele Larobina; Anna Prinster; Joseph P Hornak; S Easter Selvan; Umberto Amato; Mario Quarantelli; Gioacchino Tedeschi; Arturo Brunetti; Marco Salvatore
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2011-01-28       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Response criteria for phase II studies of supratentorial malignant glioma.

Authors:  D R Macdonald; T L Cascino; S C Schold; J G Cairncross
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Preoperative estimation of residual volume for WHO grade II glioma resected with intraoperative functional mapping.

Authors:  Emmanuel Mandonnet; Saad Jbabdi; Luc Taillandier; Damien Galanaud; Habib Benali; Laurent Capelle; Hugues Duffau
Journal:  Neuro Oncol       Date:  2006-10-03       Impact factor: 12.300

Review 8.  Response assessment in neuro-oncology (a report of the RANO group): assessment of outcome in trials of diffuse low-grade gliomas.

Authors:  M J van den Bent; J S Wefel; D Schiff; M J B Taphoorn; K Jaeckle; L Junck; T Armstrong; A Choucair; A D Waldman; T Gorlia; M Chamberlain; B G Baumert; M A Vogelbaum; D R Macdonald; D A Reardon; P Y Wen; S M Chang; A H Jacobs
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2011-04-05       Impact factor: 41.316

9.  Bidimensional measurements in brain tumors: assessment of interobserver variability.

Authors:  James M Provenzale; Claro Ison; David Delong
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 3.959

10.  Dynamic history of low-grade gliomas before and after temozolomide treatment.

Authors:  Damien Ricard; Gentian Kaloshi; Alexandra Amiel-Benouaich; Julie Lejeune; Yannick Marie; Emmanuel Mandonnet; Michèle Kujas; Karima Mokhtari; Sophie Taillibert; Florence Laigle-Donadey; Antoine F Carpentier; Antonio Omuro; Laurent Capelle; Hugues Duffau; Philippe Cornu; Rémy Guillevin; Marc Sanson; Khê Hoang-Xuan; Jean-Yves Delattre
Journal:  Ann Neurol       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 10.422

View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of MRI head placement on glioma response assessment.

Authors:  Martin Reuter; Elizabeth R Gerstner; Otto Rapalino; Tracy T Batchelor; Bruce Rosen; Bruce Fischl
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2014-02-25       Impact factor: 4.130

2.  Analyzing magnetic resonance imaging data from glioma patients using deep learning.

Authors:  Bjoern Menze; Fabian Isensee; Roland Wiest; Bene Wiestler; Klaus Maier-Hein; Mauricio Reyes; Spyridon Bakas
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2020-12-02       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 3.  Standardized MRI assessment of high-grade glioma response: a review of the essential elements and pitfalls of the RANO criteria.

Authors:  Dewen Yang
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2015-07-12

4.  Intra-rater variability in low-grade glioma segmentation.

Authors:  Hans Kristian Bø; Ole Solheim; Asgeir Store Jakola; Kjell-Arne Kvistad; Ingerid Reinertsen; Erik Magnus Berntsen
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.130

5.  Imaging practice in low-grade gliomas among European specialized centers and proposal for a minimum core of imaging.

Authors:  Christian F Freyschlag; Sandro M Krieg; Johannes Kerschbaumer; Daniel Pinggera; Marie-Therese Forster; Dominik Cordier; Marco Rossi; Gabriele Miceli; Alexandre Roux; Andrés Reyes; Silvio Sarubbo; Anja Smits; Joanna Sierpowska; Pierre A Robe; Geert-Jan Rutten; Thomas Santarius; Tomasz Matys; Marc Zanello; Fabien Almairac; Lydiane Mondot; Asgeir S Jakola; Maria Zetterling; Adrià Rofes; Gord von Campe; Remy Guillevin; Daniele Bagatto; Vincent Lubrano; Marion Rapp; John Goodden; Philip C De Witt Hamer; Johan Pallud; Lorenzo Bello; Claudius Thomé; Hugues Duffau; Emmanuel Mandonnet
Journal:  J Neurooncol       Date:  2018-07-10       Impact factor: 4.130

6.  Chemotherapy and diffuse low-grade gliomas: a survey within the European Low-Grade Glioma Network.

Authors:  Amélie Darlix; Emmanuel Mandonnet; Christian F Freyschlag; Daniel Pinggera; Marie-Therese Forster; Martin Voss; Joachim Steinbach; Carmel Loughrey; John Goodden; Giuseppe Banna; Concetta Di Blasi; Nicolas Foroglou; Andreas F Hottinger; Marie-Hélène Baron; Johan Pallud; Hugues Duffau; Geert-Jan Rutten; Fabien Almairac; Denys Fontaine; Luc Taillandier; Catarina Pessanha Viegas; Luisa Albuquerque; Gord von Campe; Tadeja Urbanic-Purkart; Marie Blonski
Journal:  Neurooncol Pract       Date:  2018-12-13
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.