Literature DB >> 23397236

Both young and older adults discount suggestions from older adults on a social memory test.

Sara D Davis1, Michelle L Meade.   

Abstract

In the present study, we examined the impacts of participant age and confederate age on social memory processes. During a collaborative recall phase, young and older adult participants were exposed to the erroneous memory reports of a young or an older adult confederate. On a subsequent individual recall test, young and older adult participants were equally likely to incorporate the confederates' erroneous suggestions into their memory reports, suggesting that participant age had a minimal effect on social memory processes. However, confederate age did have a marked effect: Young adult participants were less likely to incorporate misleading suggestions from older adult confederates and less likely to report "remembering" items suggested by older adult confederates. Critically, older adult participants were also less likely to incorporate misleading information from fellow older adult confederates. Both young and older adult participants discounted older adult confederates' contributions to a memory test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397236     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-013-0392-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  28 in total

1.  Social contagion of memory.

Authors:  H L Roediger; M L Meade; E T Bergman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-06

2.  Perceptions of an old female eyewitness: is the older eyewitness believable?

Authors:  S T Kwong See; H G Hoffman; T L Wood
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  2001-06

3.  Sibling differentials in power and memory conformity.

Authors:  Elin M Skagerberg; Daniel B Wright
Journal:  Scand J Psychol       Date:  2009-04

4.  Age differences in collaborative memory: the role of retrieval manipulations.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2009-10

5.  Conformity among cowitnesses sharing same or different information about an event in experimental collaborative eyewitness testimony.

Authors:  Kazuo Mori; Hideko Mori
Journal:  Percept Mot Skills       Date:  2008-02

6.  Memory conformity: disentangling the steps toward influence during a discussion.

Authors:  Fiona Gabbert; Amina Memon; Daniel B Wright
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2006-06

Review 7.  Source monitoring.

Authors:  M K Johnson; S Hashtroudi; D S Lindsay
Journal:  Psychol Bull       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 17.737

8.  I saw it for longer than you: the relationship between perceived encoding duration and memory conformity.

Authors:  Fiona Gabbert; Amina Memon; Daniel B Wright
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2006-06-09

9.  Aging, source, and decision criteria: when false fame errors do and do not occur.

Authors:  K S Multhaup
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1995-09

10.  Explorations in the social contagion of memory.

Authors:  Michelle L Meade; Henry L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10
View more
  2 in total

1.  The influences of partner accuracy and partner memory ability on social false memories.

Authors:  Katya T Numbers; Michelle L Meade; Vladimir A Perga
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2014-11

2.  Blame Conformity: Innocent Bystanders Can Be Blamed for a Crime as a Result of Misinformation from a Young, but Not Elderly, Adult Co-Witness.

Authors:  Craig Thorley
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-31       Impact factor: 3.240

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.