Literature DB >> 23397160

Oculus-Spark perimetry compared with 3 procedures of glaucoma morphologic analysis (GDx, HRT, and OCT).

Manuel Gonzalez de la Rosa1, Marta Gonzalez-Hernandez, Mariel Sanchez-Garcia, Ricardo Rodriguez de la Vega, Tinguaro Diaz-Aleman, Alicia Pareja Rios.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To compare diagnostic capabilities and agreement between Oculus-Spark perimetry and 3 procedures of glaucoma morphologic analysis.
METHODS: A total of 102 normal eyes and 104 consecutive eyes with suspected or confirmed glaucoma (1 eye per subject) were analyzed in a prospective observational case-control study, using Spark strategy (Oculus Easyfield Perimeter), Heidelberg retinal tomograph (HRT), Zeiss laser polarimetry (GDx), and Cirrus optical coherence tomography (OCT).
RESULTS: Spark first phase lasted 37 seconds and all 4 phases 2:34 minutes. Specificities and sensitivities were as follows: Spark mean deviation (MD) first phase (95.1%, 85.6%), MD second and final phases (95.1%, 86.5%), GDx-nerve fiber indicator (95.1%, 57.4%), HRT-Reinhard Burk discriminant function (95.1%, 52.9%), HRT glaucoma probability score (95.1%, 71.2%), Cirrus OCT vertical cup/disc ratio (96.1%, 85.6%), and Cirrus OCT retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (95.1%, 68.0%). Diagnostic agreement between second and final Spark MD phases was kappa=0.92; between phase 1 Spark/MD and Cirrus OCT/vertical C/D ratio was kappa=0.78. Agreements between the 2 Cirrus OCT indices was kappa=0.69 and between the 2 HRT indices was kappa=0.559. The correlation coefficient between second and final MD and PSD was 0.99, and 0.98 between the number of scotomatous points. There was high concordance in scotoma position in both phases (kappa=0.86). The linear correlation coefficients between the morphologic indices were 0.48-0.78, and between morphologic and functional indices 0.51-0.76. Correlation coefficients comparing morphologic and functional indices were similar in the first and the last phase (p>0.05 in all cases).
CONCLUSIONS: Spark perimetry appears to show useful sensitivity and specificity, even in the first phase, and good agreement with the morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397160     DOI: 10.5301/ejo.5000233

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1120-6721            Impact factor:   2.597


  3 in total

1.  Retinal Sensitivity Thresholds Obtained Through Easyfield and Humphrey Perimeters in Eyes with Glaucoma: A Cross-Sectional Comparative Study.

Authors:  Thaissa Nazareth; Janaina Rocha; Ana Luiza B Scoralick; Diego T Dias; Carolina P B Gracitelli; Fabio N Kanadani; Tiago S Prata
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-12-02

Review 2.  Optic nerve head and fibre layer imaging for diagnosing glaucoma.

Authors:  Manuele Michelessi; Ersilia Lucenteforte; Francesco Oddone; Miriam Brazzelli; Mariacristina Parravano; Sara Franchi; Sueko M Ng; Gianni Virgili
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-30

3.  Comparative quantification of focal and diffuse visual field loss by the SPARK Precision threshold algorithm and SITA.

Authors:  S K Foo; R P Cubbidge; R Heitmar
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-12-28       Impact factor: 3.535

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.