Literature DB >> 23397115

Combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring assists the diagnosis of sliding hiatal hernia in children with gastroesophageal reflux disease.

Jia-Feng Wu1, Wei-Chung Hsu, Ping-Huei Tseng, Hsiu-Po Wang, Hong-Yuan Hsu, Mei-Hwei Chang, Yen-Hsuan Ni.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of combined multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring (MII-pH) in diagnosing sliding hiatal hernia in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) children remains unclear. We aimed to explore the clinical efficacy of MII-pH as a supplement diagnostic method for sliding hiatal hernia.
METHODS: A total of 104 symptomatic GERD children [mean ± standard deviation (SD) age = 4.5 ± 5.5 years] were recruited. All of them were diagnosed as GERD with and without sliding hiatal hernia by barium and/or esophagogastroduodenoscopy study. All subjects received 24 h MII-pH monitoring to test the efficacy of this new modality.
RESULTS: Sixteen children were diagnosed to have sliding hiatal hernia, and nine (56.3%) of them received fundoplication. None of non-hiatal hernia children were indicated for fundoplication [risk difference (RD) 0.56; P < 0.001]. Impedance probes detected more reflux episodes than pH-probe in the whole study population (mean ± SD = 62.1 ± 47.8 vs. 47.8 ± 48.1 episodes; P = 0.02, paired t test). Due to the presence of pH-only reflux, the reflux episodes detected by impedance probes is less than that by pH probe in sliding hiatal hernia children (mean ± SD = 49.2 ± 78.9 vs. 103.7 ± 60.4 episodes; P = 0.01, paired t test). Ratio of reflux episodes detected by pH-probe to that by impedance probes >1 was more frequently noted in sliding hiatal hernia children than non-sliding hiatal hernia children (Odds ratio 58.33, P < 0.001). The sensitivity and specificity of this diagnostic tool to predict sliding hiatal hernia in GERD children are 93.8 and 79.6%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Ratio of reflux episodes detected by pH-probe to that by impedance probes >1 demonstrated by MII-pH study is a good screening test of sliding hiatal hernia in GERD children.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23397115     DOI: 10.1007/s00535-013-0750-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gastroenterol        ISSN: 0944-1174            Impact factor:   7.527


  20 in total

1.  Similar symptom patterns in gastroesophageal reflux patients with and without hiatal hernia.

Authors:  S A Antoniou; O O Koch; G A Antoniou; K U Asche; A Kaindlstorfer; F A Granderath; R Pointner
Journal:  Dis Esophagus       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.429

Review 2.  Clinical esophageal pH recording: a technical review for practice guideline development.

Authors:  P J Kahrilas; E M Quigley
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 22.682

3.  Acid and weakly acid gastroesophageal refluxes and type of respiratory symptoms in children.

Authors:  Michele Ghezzi; Michela Silvestri; Edoardo Guida; Angela Pistorio; Oliviero Sacco; Girolamo Mattioli; Vincenzo Jasonni; Giovanni A Rossi
Journal:  Respir Med       Date:  2011-02-18       Impact factor: 3.415

4.  The natural course of gastroesophageal reflux disease in children.

Authors:  M Ashorn; T Ruuska; R Karikoski; P Laippala
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.423

5.  Gastroesophageal reflux disease in children and adolescents in primary care.

Authors:  Ana Ruigómez; Mari-Ann Wallander; Per Lundborg; Saga Johansson; Luis A Garcia Rodriguez
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.423

6.  Prolonged ambulatory pH monitoring in patients with persistent gastroesophageal reflux disease symptoms: testing while on therapy identifies the need for more aggressive anti-reflux therapy.

Authors:  D A Katzka; V Paoletti; L Leite; D O Castell
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 10.864

7.  Measuring esophageal motility with a new intraluminal impedance device. First clinical results in reflux patients.

Authors:  J Fass; J Silny; J Braun; U Heindrichs; B Dreuw; V Schumpelick; G Rau
Journal:  Scand J Gastroenterol       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 2.423

8.  An analysis of distal esophageal impedance in individuals with and without esophageal motility abnormalities.

Authors:  Wojciech Blonski; Amine Hila; Marcelo F Vela; Donald O Castell
Journal:  J Clin Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.062

9.  Pediatric gastroesophageal reflux clinical practice guidelines: joint recommendations of the North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (NASPGHAN) and the European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition (ESPGHAN).

Authors:  Yvan Vandenplas; Colin D Rudolph; Carlo Di Lorenzo; Eric Hassall; Gregory Liptak; Lynnette Mazur; Judith Sondheimer; Annamaria Staiano; Michael Thomson; Gigi Veereman-Wauters; Tobias G Wenzl
Journal:  J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 2.839

10.  Hiatal hernia size, Barrett's length, and severity of acid reflux are all risk factors for esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  Benjamin Avidan; Amnon Sonnenberg; Thomas G Schnell; Gregorio Chejfec; Adrienne Metz; Stephen J Sontag
Journal:  Am J Gastroenterol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 10.864

View more
  2 in total

1.  Pelvic radiography as a non-invasive screening tool for hiatal hernia in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  In Hyuk Yoo; Hye Ran Yang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2022-08-19       Impact factor: 1.817

2.  Carbon nanotube chemiresistor for wireless pH sensing.

Authors:  Pingping Gou; Nadine D Kraut; Ian M Feigel; Hao Bai; Gregory J Morgan; Yanan Chen; Yifan Tang; Kara Bocan; Joshua Stachel; Lee Berger; Marlin Mickle; Ervin Sejdić; Alexander Star
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-03-26       Impact factor: 4.379

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.