PURPOSE: Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most common cause of respiratory failure in preterm neonates, whose lungs are often immature. The diagnosis and follow-up are based on clinical and radiographic findings. Due to the problem of air artifacts, ultrasonography (US) is not used routinely in the diagnosis of lung diseases. However, when the alveolar air content decreases, as it does in RDS, characteristic patterns appear that can be observed during US lung examinations. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of chest radiographs in neonates with RDS could be reduced by the routine use of chest US for follow-up examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April through September 2008, were enrolled all preterm newborns, with very low birth weight (VLBW), consecutive admitted in NICU with clinically and radiologically diagnosed RDS. We performed lung ultrasound examination in this patients. Video-taped US examinations were done every 8-12 h until clinical resolution of the disease was observed. Chest X-rays were performed only in unclear cases. We compared the number of chest radiographs obtained in the NICU during this period and during the preceding six months. RESULTS: 105 serial US lung examinations were performed in 21 preterm infant with clinically and radiologically diagnosed RDS. US lung examinations revealed "comet-tail" artifacts that were compact, diffuse, and symmetrically distributed throughout both lung fields. In 8 cases, the pleural line was also extensively thickened and irregular, and in 7 cases multiple subpleural hypoechoic areas indicative of lung consolidation were observed (mainly on posterior and lateral scans). The mean number of chest radiographs per infant performed in the NICU during the study period was significantly lower than that of the preceding six months (2.6 ± 1 versus 3.8 ± 1.5; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chest ultrasound is a valid alternative for the follow-up of VLBW infants with RDS, which can decrease the need for chest X-rays and reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation.
PURPOSE:Respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) is the most common cause of respiratory failure in preterm neonates, whose lungs are often immature. The diagnosis and follow-up are based on clinical and radiographic findings. Due to the problem of air artifacts, ultrasonography (US) is not used routinely in the diagnosis of lung diseases. However, when the alveolar air content decreases, as it does in RDS, characteristic patterns appear that can be observed during US lung examinations. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of chest radiographs in neonates with RDS could be reduced by the routine use of chest US for follow-up examinations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: From April through September 2008, were enrolled all preterm newborns, with very low birth weight (VLBW), consecutive admitted in NICU with clinically and radiologically diagnosed RDS. We performed lung ultrasound examination in this patients. Video-taped US examinations were done every 8-12 h until clinical resolution of the disease was observed. Chest X-rays were performed only in unclear cases. We compared the number of chest radiographs obtained in the NICU during this period and during the preceding six months. RESULTS: 105 serial US lung examinations were performed in 21 preterm infant with clinically and radiologically diagnosed RDS. US lung examinations revealed "comet-tail" artifacts that were compact, diffuse, and symmetrically distributed throughout both lung fields. In 8 cases, the pleural line was also extensively thickened and irregular, and in 7 cases multiple subpleural hypoechoic areas indicative of lung consolidation were observed (mainly on posterior and lateral scans). The mean number of chest radiographs per infant performed in the NICU during the study period was significantly lower than that of the preceding six months (2.6 ± 1 versus 3.8 ± 1.5; p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Chest ultrasound is a valid alternative for the follow-up of VLBW infants with RDS, which can decrease the need for chest X-rays and reduce patient exposure to ionizing radiation.
Authors: Daniel A Lichtenstein; Gilbert Mezière; Nathalie Lascols; Philippe Biderman; Jean-Paul Courret; Agnès Gepner; Ivan Goldstein; Marc Tenoudji-Cohen Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2005-06 Impact factor: 7.598