OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of, characterize the usage of, and propose potential research applications for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) tobacco codes in clinical populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data on cancer cases and cancer-free controls from Vanderbilt's biorepository, BioVU, we evaluated the utility of ICD-9 tobacco use codes to identify ever-smokers in general and high smoking prevalence (lung cancer) clinic populations. We assessed potential biases in documentation, and performed temporal analysis relating transitions between smoking codes to smoking cessation attempts. We also examined the suitability of these codes for use in genetic association analyses. RESULTS: ICD-9 tobacco use codes can identify smokers in a general clinic population (specificity of 1, sensitivity of 0.32), and there is little evidence of documentation bias. Frequency of code transitions between 'current' and 'former' tobacco use was significantly correlated with initial success at smoking cessation (p<0.0001). Finally, code-based smoking status assignment is a comparable covariate to text-based smoking status for genetic association studies. DISCUSSION: Our results support the use of ICD-9 tobacco use codes for identifying smokers in a clinical population. Furthermore, with some limitations, these codes are suitable for adjustment of smoking status in genetic studies utilizing electronic health records. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers should not be deterred by the unavailability of full-text records to determine smoking status if they have ICD-9 code histories.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the validity of, characterize the usage of, and propose potential research applications for International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) tobacco codes in clinical populations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using data on cancer cases and cancer-free controls from Vanderbilt's biorepository, BioVU, we evaluated the utility of ICD-9 tobacco use codes to identify ever-smokers in general and high smoking prevalence (lung cancer) clinic populations. We assessed potential biases in documentation, and performed temporal analysis relating transitions between smoking codes to smoking cessation attempts. We also examined the suitability of these codes for use in genetic association analyses. RESULTS: ICD-9 tobacco use codes can identify smokers in a general clinic population (specificity of 1, sensitivity of 0.32), and there is little evidence of documentation bias. Frequency of code transitions between 'current' and 'former' tobacco use was significantly correlated with initial success at smoking cessation (p<0.0001). Finally, code-based smoking status assignment is a comparable covariate to text-based smoking status for genetic association studies. DISCUSSION: Our results support the use of ICD-9 tobacco use codes for identifying smokers in a clinical population. Furthermore, with some limitations, these codes are suitable for adjustment of smoking status in genetic studies utilizing electronic health records. CONCLUSIONS: Researchers should not be deterred by the unavailability of full-text records to determine smoking status if they have ICD-9 code histories.
Entities:
Keywords:
Electronic Health Records; International Classification of Diseases; Phenotype
Authors: Marylyn D Ritchie; Joshua C Denny; Dana C Crawford; Andrea H Ramirez; Justin B Weiner; Jill M Pulley; Melissa A Basford; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Jeffrey R Balser; Daniel R Masys; Jonathan L Haines; Dan M Roden Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 2010-04-01 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: D M Roden; J M Pulley; M A Basford; G R Bernard; E W Clayton; J R Balser; D R Masys Journal: Clin Pharmacol Ther Date: 2008-05-21 Impact factor: 6.875
Authors: Kathleen A McGinnis; Cynthia A Brandt; Melissa Skanderson; Amy C Justice; Shahida Shahrir; Adeel A Butt; Sheldon T Brown; Matthew S Freiberg; Cynthia L Gibert; Matthew Bidwell Goetz; Joon Woo Kim; Margaret A Pisani; David Rimland; Maria C Rodriguez-Barradas; Jason J Sico; Hilary A Tindle; Kristina Crothers Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2011-09-12 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Thorgeir E Thorgeirsson; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Ida Surakka; Jacqueline M Vink; Najaf Amin; Frank Geller; Patrick Sulem; Thorunn Rafnar; Tõnu Esko; Stefan Walter; Christian Gieger; Rajesh Rawal; Massimo Mangino; Inga Prokopenko; Reedik Mägi; Kaisu Keskitalo; Iris H Gudjonsdottir; Solveig Gretarsdottir; Hreinn Stefansson; John R Thompson; Yurii S Aulchenko; Mari Nelis; Katja K Aben; Martin den Heijer; Asger Dirksen; Haseem Ashraf; Nicole Soranzo; Ana M Valdes; Claire Steves; André G Uitterlinden; Albert Hofman; Anke Tönjes; Peter Kovacs; Jouke Jan Hottenga; Gonneke Willemsen; Nicole Vogelzangs; Angela Döring; Norbert Dahmen; Barbara Nitz; Michele L Pergadia; Berta Saez; Veronica De Diego; Victoria Lezcano; Maria D Garcia-Prats; Samuli Ripatti; Markus Perola; Johannes Kettunen; Anna-Liisa Hartikainen; Anneli Pouta; Jaana Laitinen; Matti Isohanni; Shen Huei-Yi; Maxine Allen; Maria Krestyaninova; Alistair S Hall; Gregory T Jones; Andre M van Rij; Thomas Mueller; Benjamin Dieplinger; Meinhard Haltmayer; Steinn Jonsson; Stefan E Matthiasson; Hogni Oskarsson; Thorarinn Tyrfingsson; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Jose I Mayordomo; Jes S Lindholt; Jesper Holst Pedersen; Wilbur A Franklin; Holly Wolf; Grant W Montgomery; Andrew C Heath; Nicholas G Martin; Pamela A F Madden; Ina Giegling; Dan Rujescu; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Veikko Salomaa; Michael Stumvoll; Tim D Spector; H-Erich Wichmann; Andres Metspalu; Nilesh J Samani; Brenda W Penninx; Ben A Oostra; Dorret I Boomsma; Henning Tiemeier; Cornelia M van Duijn; Jaakko Kaprio; Jeffrey R Gulcher; Mark I McCarthy; Leena Peltonen; Unnur Thorsteinsdottir; Kari Stefansson Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2010-04-25 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Catherine A McCarty; Rex L Chisholm; Christopher G Chute; Iftikhar J Kullo; Gail P Jarvik; Eric B Larson; Rongling Li; Daniel R Masys; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dan M Roden; Jeffery P Struewing; Wendy A Wolf Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: James D McKay; Rayjean J Hung; Valerie Gaborieau; Paolo Boffetta; Amelie Chabrier; Graham Byrnes; David Zaridze; Anush Mukeria; Neonilia Szeszenia-Dabrowska; Jolanta Lissowska; Peter Rudnai; Eleonora Fabianova; Dana Mates; Vladimir Bencko; Lenka Foretova; Vladimir Janout; John McLaughlin; Frances Shepherd; Alexandre Montpetit; Steven Narod; Hans E Krokan; Frank Skorpen; Maiken Bratt Elvestad; Lars Vatten; Inger Njølstad; Tomas Axelsson; Chu Chen; Gary Goodman; Matt Barnett; Melissa M Loomis; Jan Lubiñski; Joanna Matyjasik; Marcin Lener; Dorota Oszutowska; John Field; Triantafillos Liloglou; George Xinarianos; Adrian Cassidy; Paolo Vineis; Francoise Clavel-Chapelon; Domenico Palli; Rosario Tumino; Vittorio Krogh; Salvatore Panico; Carlos A González; José Ramón Quirós; Carmen Martínez; Carmen Navarro; Eva Ardanaz; Nerea Larrañaga; Kay Tee Kham; Timothy Key; H Bas Bueno-de-Mesquita; Petra Hm Peeters; Antonia Trichopoulou; Jakob Linseisen; Heiner Boeing; Göran Hallmans; Kim Overvad; Anne Tjønneland; Merethe Kumle; Elio Riboli; Diana Zelenika; Anne Boland; Marc Delepine; Mario Foglio; Doris Lechner; Fumihiko Matsuda; Helene Blanche; Ivo Gut; Simon Heath; Mark Lathrop; Paul Brennan Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2008-11-02 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: Mary Regina Boland; George Hripcsak; Yufeng Shen; Wendy K Chung; Chunhua Weng Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2013-09-03 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Karen Curtin; Lisa A Cannon-Albright; James VanDerslice; Zhe Yu; Kimberly A Herget; Ramya Thota; Deborah W Neklason Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-09-26 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Shria Kumar; David C Metz; Gregory G Ginsberg; David E Kaplan; David S Goldberg Journal: Aliment Pharmacol Ther Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 8.171
Authors: Nichole T Tanner; Lin Dai; Brett C Bade; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Gerard A Silvestri Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2017-09-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Joan A Casey; Frank C Curriero; Sara E Cosgrove; Keeve E Nachman; Brian S Schwartz Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2013-11-25 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: William S Bush; Jonathan Boston; Sarah A Pendergrass; Logan Dumitrescu; Robert Goodloe; Kristin Brown-Gentry; Sarah Wilson; Bob McClellan; Eric Torstenson; Melissa A Basford; Kylee L Spencer; Marylyn D Ritchie; Dana C Crawford Journal: Pac Symp Biocomput Date: 2013