Literature DB >> 2339636

Fluoride pharmacokinetics in good and poor responders to fluoride therapy.

M E Kraenzlin1, C Kraenzlin, S M Farley, R J Fitzsimmons, D J Baylink.   

Abstract

In this study, the relationship between fluoride pharmacokinetics and the response in spinal bone density to fluoride treatment was studied in 14 patients with primary osteoporosis treated with fluoride for at least 1 year. Serum concentrations and urinary excretion of fluoride were determined after ingestion of 10 mg fluoride as monofluorophosphate. The pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated according to a linear one-compartment open model. The fasting serum fluoride level was 8.8 +/- 0.98 mumol/liter. The peak serum fluoride level was 20.5 +/- 1.4 mumol/liter and was reached within 2 h after ingestion of fluoride. When the patients were divided into good and poor responders, based on whether they did or did not exhibit a change in spinal bone density of 13 mg/cc per year or more, we found that good responders had decreased renal fluoride clearance (-62 +/- 13%, p less than .02), increased maximum change in serum fluoride (+38 +/- 18%, p less than .01), increased extrarenal clearance (+62 +/- 57%, p less than .05) and increased change in serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP) (+241 +/- 169%, p less than 0.02) compared with poor responders. Our data suggest that one factor accounting for a good response is a relatively high serum level of fluoride. However, although the maximum change in serum fluoride was greater in good responders compared with poor responders, variations in fluoride levels could not explain all of the variation in spinal bone density. Therefore, we propose that in addition to differences in serum fluoride, other factors are also responsible for the good response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2339636     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650051370

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  3 in total

1.  A comparative bioavailability study on two new sustained-release formulations of disodiummonofluorophosphate versus a nonsustained-release formulation in healthy volunteers.

Authors:  L Erlacher; H Templ; D Magometschnigg
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.333

Review 2.  Fluoride therapy for osteoporosis: a review of dose response, duration of treatment, and skeletal sites of action.

Authors:  B A Dure-Smith; M E Kraenzlin; S M Farley; C R Libanati; E E Schulz; D J Baylink
Journal:  Calcif Tissue Int       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 4.333

3.  Comparison of serum fluoride levels after administration of monofluorophosphate-calcium carbonate or sodium fluoride: differences in peak serum concentrations.

Authors:  L Erlacher; H Teufelsbauer; P Bernecker; P Pietschmann; M Weissel
Journal:  Clin Investig       Date:  1994-12
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.