Literature DB >> 23396117

Delayed diagnosis is associated with changes in the clinical and ultrasound features of subcutaneous endometriosis near cesarean section scars.

G Francica1, F Scarano.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the present study was to highlight the sonographic and clinical characteristics of large (≥30 mm in diameter) scar endometriomas near Pfannenstiel incisions, assuming that large size is a marker of delayed diagnosis.
METHODS: We compared clinical, ultrasound (US) and color Doppler findings in 13 patients (mean age 31.3 years) with 13 large scar endometriomas (L-SEs) (mean lesion diameter 41.8 mm; range 30-60 mm) and 17 women (mean age 30.7 years) with 19 small scar endometriomas (S-SEs) (mean lesion size 18.3 mm; range 7-26 mm).
RESULTS: Compared with the S-SE group, the L-SE group had a significantly longer mean interval between the last cesarean section and hospital admission (5.5 vs. 3.3 years; p < 0.01) and longer mean duration of symptoms before admission (43 vs. 17.4 months; p < 0.01). The L-SE group also had a significantly higher percentage of patients who had undergone at least one inconclusive diagnostic examination (Computed Tomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, fine needle biopsy, or laparoscopy) (39% vs. 0%; p < 0.05). As for US findings, L-SEs more frequently displayed cystic regions and fistulous tracts (p < 0.05), loss of round/oval shape (p < 0.05), and increased vascularity (p < 0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: Delayed diagnosis of scar endometrioma reflected by a longer and more complex medical history results in larger than usual endometriomas with peculiar US findings, which are even more likely to be misinterpreted by physicians and radiologists.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Cesarean section; Color Doppler; Endometriosis; Ultrasound

Year:  2009        PMID: 23396117      PMCID: PMC3552647          DOI: 10.1016/j.jus.2009.05.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Ultrasound        ISSN: 1876-7931


  28 in total

1.  Needle tract endometriosis: an unusual complication of amniocentesis.

Authors:  A Kaunitz; P A Di Sant'Agnese
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1979-12       Impact factor: 7.661

Review 2.  Endometriosis: radiologic-pathologic correlation.

Authors:  P J Woodward; R Sohaey; T P Mezzetti
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 3.  Cutaneous endometriosis.

Authors:  W D Steck; E B Helwig
Journal:  Clin Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1966-06       Impact factor: 2.190

Review 4.  Abdominal wall endometriomas.

Authors:  Amit J Dwivedi; Sunita N Agrawal; Yvan J Silva
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 3.199

5.  Incisional endometriosis: an underappreciated diagnosis in general surgery.

Authors:  R Nirula; G C Greaney
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 6.113

6.  Endometriosis in abdominal scars: a report of three cases diagnosed by fine-needle aspiration biopsy.

Authors:  A Simsir; K Thorner; J Waisman; J Cangiarella
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 0.688

7.  Abdominal wall endometrioma: CT findings.

Authors:  M Amato; R Levitt
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 1.826

8.  Abdominal wall endometriomas.

Authors:  Ray G Blanco; Vellore S Parithivel; Ajay K Shah; Milton A Gumbs; Moshe Schein; Paul H Gerst
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 2.565

9.  Abdominal wall endometriomas near cesarean delivery scars: sonographic and color doppler findings in a series of 12 patients.

Authors:  Giampiero Francica; Cristiano Giardiello; Giovanni Angelone; Stefano Cristiano; Raffaele Finelli; Giampaolo Tramontano
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 2.153

10.  Scar endometriosis: a clinicopathologic study of 17 cases.

Authors:  S K Chatterjee
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1980-07       Impact factor: 7.661

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.