OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between typically measured prenatal screening biomarkers and early-preterm birth in euploid pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: The study included 345 early-preterm cases (<30 weeks of gestation) and 1725 control subjects who were drawn from a population-based sample of California pregnancies who had both first- and second-trimester screening results. Logistic regression analyses were used to compare patterns of biomarkers in cases and control subjects and to develop predictive models. Replicability of the biomarker early-preterm relationships that was revealed by the models was evaluated by examination of the frequency and associated adjusted relative risks (RRs) for early-preterm birth and for preterm birth in general (<37 weeks of gestation) in pregnancies with identified abnormal markers compared with pregnancies without these markers in a subsequent independent California cohort of screened pregnancies (n = 76,588). RESULTS: The final model for early-preterm birth included first-trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in the ≤5th percentile, second-trimester alpha-fetoprotein in the ≥95th percentile, and second-trimester inhibin in the ≥95th percentile (odds ratios, 2.3-3.6). In general, pregnancies in the subsequent cohort with a biomarker pattern that were found to be associated with early-preterm delivery in the first sample were at an increased risk for early-preterm birth and preterm birth in general (<37 weeks of gestation; adjusted RR, 1.6-27.4). Pregnancies with ≥2 biomarker abnormalities were at particularly increased risk (adjusted RR, 3.6-27.4). CONCLUSION: When considered across cohorts and in combination, abnormalities in routinely collected biomarkers reveal predictable risks for early-preterm birth.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the relationship between typically measured prenatal screening biomarkers and early-preterm birth in euploid pregnancies. STUDY DESIGN: The study included 345 early-preterm cases (<30 weeks of gestation) and 1725 control subjects who were drawn from a population-based sample of California pregnancies who had both first- and second-trimester screening results. Logistic regression analyses were used to compare patterns of biomarkers in cases and control subjects and to develop predictive models. Replicability of the biomarker early-preterm relationships that was revealed by the models was evaluated by examination of the frequency and associated adjusted relative risks (RRs) for early-preterm birth and for preterm birth in general (<37 weeks of gestation) in pregnancies with identified abnormal markers compared with pregnancies without these markers in a subsequent independent California cohort of screened pregnancies (n = 76,588). RESULTS: The final model for early-preterm birth included first-trimester pregnancy-associated plasma protein A in the ≤5th percentile, second-trimester alpha-fetoprotein in the ≥95th percentile, and second-trimester inhibin in the ≥95th percentile (odds ratios, 2.3-3.6). In general, pregnancies in the subsequent cohort with a biomarker pattern that were found to be associated with early-preterm delivery in the first sample were at an increased risk for early-preterm birth and preterm birth in general (<37 weeks of gestation; adjusted RR, 1.6-27.4). Pregnancies with ≥2 biomarker abnormalities were at particularly increased risk (adjusted RR, 3.6-27.4). CONCLUSION: When considered across cohorts and in combination, abnormalities in routinely collected biomarkers reveal predictable risks for early-preterm birth.
Authors: Lorraine Dugoff; John C Hobbins; Fergal D Malone; John Vidaver; Lisa Sullivan; Jacob A Canick; Geralyn M Lambert-Messerlian; T Flint Porter; David A Luthy; Christine H Comstock; George Saade; Keith Eddleman; Irwin R Merkatz; Sabrina D Craigo; Ilan E Timor-Tritsch; Stephen R Carr; Honor M Wolfe; Mary E D'Alton Journal: Obstet Gynecol Date: 2005-08 Impact factor: 7.661
Authors: Victor A Rosenberg; Irina A Buhimschi; Antonette T Dulay; Sonya S Abdel-Razeq; Emily A Oliver; Christina M Duzyj; Heather Lipkind; Christian M Pettker; Catalin S Buhimschi Journal: Am J Reprod Immunol Date: 2011-10-13 Impact factor: 3.886
Authors: Bat Zion Shachar; Jonathan A Mayo; Henry C Lee; Suzan L Carmichael; David K Stevenson; Gary M Shaw; Jeffery B Gould Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2015-07-15 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Véronique Taché; Rebecca J Baer; Robert J Currier; Chin-Shang Li; Dena Towner; L Elaine Waetjen; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-03-14 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Ning Xu; Gillian M Barlow; Jinrui Cui; Erica T Wang; Bora Lee; Marzieh Akhlaghpour; Lindsay Kroener; John Williams; Jerome I Rotter; Yii-der I Chen; Mark O Goodarzi; Margareta D Pisarska Journal: Reprod Sci Date: 2016-11-14 Impact factor: 3.060
Authors: Brittney M Snyder; Rebecca J Baer; Scott P Oltman; Jennifer G Robinson; Patrick J Breheny; Audrey F Saftlas; Wei Bao; Andrea L Greiner; Knute D Carter; Larry Rand; Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Kelli K Ryckman Journal: Diabetes Res Clin Pract Date: 2020-04-06 Impact factor: 5.602
Authors: D J Lyell; A M Faucett; R J Baer; Y J Blumenfeld; M L Druzin; Y Y El-Sayed; G M Shaw; R J Currier; L L Jelliffe-Pawlowski Journal: J Perinatol Date: 2015-04-30 Impact factor: 2.521
Authors: L L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; R J Baer; Y J Blumenfeld; K K Ryckman; H M O'Brodovich; J B Gould; M L Druzin; Y Y El-Sayed; D J Lyell; D K Stevenson; G M Shaw; R J Currier Journal: BJOG Date: 2015-06-26 Impact factor: 6.531
Authors: Laura L Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Kelli K Ryckman; Bruce Bedell; Hugh M O'Brodovich; Jeffrey B Gould; Dierdre J Lyell; Kristi S Borowski; Gary M Shaw; Jeffrey C Murray; David K Stevenson Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2014-05-13 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Juan Yang; Michelle Pearl; Gerald N DeLorenze; Roberto Romero; Zhong Dong; Laura Jelliffe-Pawlowski; Robert Currier; Monica Flessel; Martin Kharrazi Journal: Am J Obstet Gynecol Date: 2016-04-09 Impact factor: 8.661
Authors: Barbara J Stegmann; Mark Santillan; Benjamin Leader; Elaine Smith; Donna Santillan Journal: Fertil Steril Date: 2015-06-19 Impact factor: 7.329