Literature DB >> 23395531

Clinical translation of recommendations from randomized clinical trials on patching regimen for amblyopia.

Ya-Ping Jin1, Amy H Y Chow, Linda Colpa, Agnes M F Wong.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate whether the evidence-based recommendations by the Pediatric Eye Disease Investigator Group (PEDIG) as initial treatment of amblyopia have been implemented into clinical practice and to discuss the necessary steps in translating evidence-based knowledge to inform clinical decision making.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. PARTICIPANTS: Children with amblyopia seen from 2007 through 2009 by academic and community ophthalmologists in a large urban center in North America that serves a population of more than 8 million. Using PEDIG criteria, moderate amblyopia was defined as visual acuity between 20/40 and 20/80 and severe amblyopia was defined as visual acuity between 20/100 and 20/400. INTERVENTION: Patching of the sound eye. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The number of prescribed patching hours daily and the amblyopic eye visual acuity expressed as logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR).
RESULTS: For moderate amblyopia, the cohort (n = 71) was prescribed a mean of 3.2 hours of daily patching (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.8-3.6 hours), which is significantly greater than the recommended 2 hours of daily patching for initial treatment. Only 24% (95% CI, 16%-35%) of them were prescribed the recommended initial patching hours. The amblyopic eye acuity on the 3- to 6-month visit in the cohort (0.23 logMAR) was similar to that of the 4-month visit in the PEDIG cohort (0.24 logMAR; P = 0.74). For severe amblyopia, the cohort (n = 52) was prescribed a mean of 3.9 hours of daily patching (95% CI, 3.5-4.3 hours), which is significantly lower than the recommended 6 hours of daily patching for initial treatment. Only 12% (95% CI, 5%-23%) of them were prescribed the recommended initial patching hours. The amblyopic eye acuity at the 7- to 12-month visit in the cohort (0.44 logMAR) was comparable with that of the 4-month visit in the PEDIG cohort (0.40 logMAR; P = 0.35).
CONCLUSIONS: The evidence-based recommendations for amblyopia management have not been translated widely into changes in clinical practice in a large urban center in North America, although there is a general move from full-time to part-time patching since the PEDIG results were published. Using a well-established framework for knowledge translation, the Knowledge-to-Action Cycle, the necessary steps required to implement new knowledge into actual clinical practice are discussed.
Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Ophthalmology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23395531     DOI: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2012.09.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmology        ISSN: 0161-6420            Impact factor:   12.079


  3 in total

1.  One Year of Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus Research in Review.

Authors:  Iris S Kassem; Marilyn T Miller; Steven M Archer
Journal:  Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila)       Date:  2013 Nov-Dec

2.  Full time occlusion VS part time occlusion in treatment of monocular amblyopia.

Authors:  Mohammad Asim Mehboob; Shoaib Muhammad; Muhammad Asad Farooq
Journal:  Pak J Med Sci       Date:  2019 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.088

3.  Systematic review of the appropriateness of eye care delivery in eye care practice.

Authors:  Kam Chun Ho; Fiona Stapleton; Louise Wiles; Peter Hibbert; Sally Alkhawajah; Andrew White; Isabelle Jalbert
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.655

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.