Literature DB >> 23395206

Hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections.

Frédéric Cochennec1, Philippe Tresson, Jane Cross, Pascal Desgranges, Eric Allaire, Jean-Pierre Becquemin.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Hybrid interventions combining debranching of supra-aortic branch vessels with stent grafting of the aortic arch have become an attractive alternative to open repair for aortic arch pathologies. However, results in patients with dissections of the aortic arch remain unclear. We present our experience with hybrid aortic arch repair for acute and chronic type B aortic dissections (TBAD) involving the distal part of the arch and aortic dissections distal to previous repair of the ascending aorta.
METHODS: Between January 2004 and December 2011, hybrid arch repair with supra-aortic branch revascularization involving at least one carotid artery bypass and simultaneous or staged thoracic endovascular aortic repair was performed in 17 patients with a dissection involving the arch. Indications for hybrid repair were complicated acute TBAD in five patients (three impending ruptures, two malperfusion syndromes), chronic aneurysmal degeneration of a TBAD involving the aortic arch in eight, and chronic aneurysmal degeneration of a dissection distal to previous repair of the ascending aorta in four. Total arch debranching was performed in seven patients and cervical debranching in 10. Median follow-up was 13 months (range, 3-69 months).
RESULTS: Overall 30-day mortality and in-hospital mortality rates were 29% (5 of 17 patients). In-hospital death occurred in three of five patients (60%) with a complicated acute TBAD vs in two of 12 patients (17%) with chronic dissection (P = .12) and in one of seven (14%) with total arch debranching vs four of 10 patients (40%) with cervical debranching (P = .34). Two (12%) fatal strokes and four (24%) retrograde aortic dissections occurred. Retrograde aortic dissections tended to be more prevalent in patients with acute TBAD than in those with chronic dissection (3 of 5 vs 1 of 12; P = .053). No spinal cord ischemia was recorded. Two other patients died, at 8 and 26 months, after the operation of causes not related to the aortic dissection. Persistent perfusion in the aortic false lumen of the graft exclusion segment was identified in six patients, due to type III endoleak (n = 2) requiring additional endovascular intervention, type II endoleak (n = 3), or retrograde perfusion from distal fenestrations (n = 2). No proximal type I endoleak was identified. During follow-up, the dissected aorta distal to the stent graft remained stable in all surviving patients.
CONCLUSIONS: In this series, mortality rates and incidence of retrograde aortic dissection were significant after hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections, especially in acute cases. These results are in contrast with previously published series including other aortic arch pathologies. They suggest that dissections of the aortic arch may represent a less favorable patient cohort.
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23395206     DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.11.081

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0741-5214            Impact factor:   4.268


  13 in total

1.  Frozen elephant trunk in acute type I dissection-a personal view.

Authors:  Heinz Jakob
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-09

2.  Zone zero hybrid arch exclusion versus open total arch replacement.

Authors:  Ourania Preventza; Corinne W Tan; Vicente Orozco-Sevilla; Caleb J Euhus; Joseph S Coselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-05

3.  Best surgical option for arch extension of type B dissection: the endovascular approach.

Authors:  Toru Kuratani
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2014-05

4.  Repair of complicated type B dissection with an aberrant right subclavian artery.

Authors:  Jun-Ming Zhu; Rui-Dong Qi; Yong-Min Liu; Jun Zheng; Xiao-Yan Xing; Li-Zhong Sun
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2016-03-07

5.  Case Report: Delayed Type A Aortic Dissection Following Complete Debranching of the Aortic Arch and Stent Graft Placement.

Authors:  Odeaa Al Jabbari; Walid K Abu Saleh; Ali Irshad; Trolls Christensen; Brian Bruckner; Jean Bismuth; Matthias Loebe
Journal:  Methodist Debakey Cardiovasc J       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar

Review 6.  Retrograde Type A Aortic Dissection After Thoracic Endovascular Aortic Repair: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yanqing Chen; Simeng Zhang; Lei Liu; Qingsheng Lu; Tianyi Zhang; Zaiping Jing
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.501

7.  Endovascular Stent Grafting for Aortic Arch Aneurysm in Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease following Aortic Arch Debranching and Aortobifemoral Reconstruction.

Authors:  Didem Melis Oztas; Cagla Canbay; Yilmaz Onal; Metin Onur Beyaz; Omer Ali Sayin; Mehmet Barburoglu; Mehmet Buget; Mesut Yornuk; Aziz Ari; Murat Ugurlucan; Bulent Acunas; Ufuk Alpagut; Enver Dayioglu
Journal:  Case Rep Med       Date:  2017-03-16

8.  Off pump hybrid extra-anatomic techniques for aortic arch repair-own experience.

Authors:  Piotr Buczkowski; Mateusz Puslecki; Sebastian Stefaniak; Robert Juszkat; Jerzy Kulesza; Marcin Misterski; Tomasz Urbanowicz; Marcin Ligowski; Bartosz Zabicki; Marek Dabrowski; Lukasz Szarpak; Damian Gorczyca; Marek Jemielity; Bartłomiej Perek
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Retrospective analysis of factors associated with aortic remodeling in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection after thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

Authors:  Biao Yu; Tangzhiming Li; Huadong Liu
Journal:  J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 1.637

10.  Hybrid repair versus conventional open repair for aortic arch dissection.

Authors:  Edel P Kavanagh; Sherif Sultan; Fionnuala Jordan; Ala Elhelali; Declan Devane; Dave Veerasingam; Niamh Hynes
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2021-07-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.