Literature DB >> 23395116

Surgical management of traumatic knee dislocation with posterolateral corner injury.

Samir Abdul Razik Ibrahim1, Sami Ghafar, Mahmood Salah, Mohamed Abo Alnas, Abdulrahman Al Misfer, Hassan Farouk, Hamed Al Haran, Sharif Khirait.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the results of our method of surgical treatment of traumatic knee dislocation with injury to the posterolateral corner by use of a standardized protocol.
METHODS: Twenty-five consecutive patients presented with a grossly dislocated or reduced knee. Five of these patients were not included in this series. The remaining 20 patients were treated by primary arthroscopic reconstruction. The anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) was reconstructed using gracilis tendon reinforced with artificial ligament (Ligament Augmentation and Reconstruction System [LARS] ligament); the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) was reconstructed with semitendinosus tendon and reinforced with LARS ligament; and the posterolateral corner was treated using the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons from the uninjured knee. Twenty patients returned for subjective and objective evaluation at a minimum of 24 months after surgery. Early mobilization through continuous and active exercise was started on the fourth day postoperatively.
RESULTS: At a mean follow-up of 44 months, the mean Lysholm score was 90 points, the mean score on the survey of daily activities was 90 points, and the sports activities score on the knee outcome survey averaged 80 points. By the rating of Meyers et al. the results were excellent in 6 patients, good in 10 patients, fair in 3 patients, and poor in one patient. The final International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) rating was not normal in any knee. The mean loss of extension was 2° (range, 0° to 3°) and loss of flexion was 12° (range, 10° to 15°).
CONCLUSIONS: By using the described method of arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the cruciate ligaments and the posterolateral corner, 80% of the patients had good subjective results and functional stability, and according to the IKDC scale, 45% of knees were nearly normal, 45% were abnormal, and 10% were severely abnormal. No patient's rating returned to normal. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, therapeutic case series.
Copyright © 2013 Arthroscopy Association of North America. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23395116     DOI: 10.1016/j.arthro.2012.11.021

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arthroscopy        ISSN: 0749-8063            Impact factor:   4.772


  15 in total

1.  Biological and Biomechanical Evaluation of Autologous Tendon Combined with Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System Artificial Ligament in a Rabbit Model of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

Authors:  Xin-Min Wang; Gang Ji; Xiao-Meng Wang; Hui-Jun Kang; Fei Wang
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-04-06       Impact factor: 2.071

2.  Reconstruction of the posterolateral corner of the knee with achilles tendon allograft.

Authors:  Scott A Kuzma; Roxanne M Chow; William M Engasser; Michael J Stuart; Bruce A Levy
Journal:  Arthrosc Tech       Date:  2014-06-16

3.  Medial injury in knee dislocations: what are the common injury patterns and surgical outcomes?

Authors:  Brian C Werner; Michael M Hadeed; F Winston Gwathmey; Cree M Gaskin; Joseph M Hart; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  The timing of surgical treatment of knee dislocations: a systematic review.

Authors:  Wu Jiang; Jianhua Yao; Yuan He; Wei Sun; Yan Huang; Dejia Kong
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-11-19       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 5.  Surgical management of the multiple-ligament injured knee: a case series from Chongqing, China and review of published reports.

Authors:  Yuan Zhang; Xia Zhang; Yong Hao; Yu-Mei Zhang; Min Wang; Yue Zhou
Journal:  Orthop Surg       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.071

6.  Functional assessment of combined reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament and posterolateral corner with a single femoral tunnel: a two-year minimum follow-up.

Authors:  Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Marco Kawamura Demange; Roberto Freire da Mota e Albuquerque; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Fabio Janson Angelini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  External fixator for treatment of the sub-acute and chronic multi-ligament-injured knee.

Authors:  Fabio Janson Angelini; Camilo Partezani Helito; Marcelo Batista Bonadio; Tales Molica Guimarães; Ronald Bispo Barreto; José Ricardo Pécora; Gilberto Luis Camanho; Roberto Freire da Mota E Albuquerque
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  LARS synthetic ligaments for the acute management of 111 acute knee dislocations: effective surgical treatment for most ligaments.

Authors:  Pierre Ranger; Andréa Senay; Geneviève Rochette Gratton; Marc Lacelle; Josée Delisle
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  Clinical outcomes after multiligament injured knees: medial versus lateral reconstructions.

Authors:  N Tardy; P Boisrenoult; P Teissier; C Steltzlen; P Beaufils; N Pujol
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 4.342

10.  Is stability of the proximal tibiofibular joint important in the multiligament-injured knee?

Authors:  Michael Jabara; Jeffrey Bradley; Michael Merrick
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.176

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.