Literature DB >> 23395008

On the interplay of machine learning and background knowledge in image interpretation by Bayesian networks.

Marina Velikova1, Peter J F Lucas, Maurice Samulski, Nico Karssemeijer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To obtain a balanced view on the role and place of expert knowledge and learning methods in building Bayesian networks for medical image interpretation. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The interpretation of mammograms was selected as the example medical image interpretation problem. Medical image interpretation has its own common standards and procedures. The impact of these on two complementary methods for Bayesian network construction was explored. Firstly, methods for the discretisation of continuous features were investigated, yielding multinomial distributions that were compared to the original Gaussian probabilistic parameters of the network. Secondly, the structure of a manually constructed Bayesian network was tested by structure learning from image data. The image data used for the research came from screening mammographic examinations of 795 patients, of whom 344 were cancerous.
RESULTS: The experimental results show that there is an interesting interplay of machine learning results and background knowledge in medical image interpretation. Networks with discretised data lead to better classification performance (increase in the detected cancers of up to 11.7%), easier interpretation, and a better fit to the data in comparison to the expert-based Bayesian network with Gaussian probabilistic parameters. Gaussian probability distributions are often used in medical image interpretation because of the continuous nature of many of the image features. The structures learnt supported many of the expert-originated relationships but also revealed some novel relationships between the mammographic features. Using discretised features and performing structure learning on the mammographic data has further improved the cancer detection performance of up to 17% compared to the manually constructed Bayesian network model.
CONCLUSION: Finding the right balance between expert knowledge and data-derived knowledge, both at the level of network structure and parameters, is key to using Bayesian networks for medical image interpretation. A balanced approach to building Bayesian networks for image interpretation yields more accurate and understandable Bayesian network models.
Copyright © 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23395008     DOI: 10.1016/j.artmed.2012.12.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Artif Intell Med        ISSN: 0933-3657            Impact factor:   5.326


  5 in total

Review 1.  Current Applications and Future Impact of Machine Learning in Radiology.

Authors:  Garry Choy; Omid Khalilzadeh; Mark Michalski; Synho Do; Anthony E Samir; Oleg S Pianykh; J Raymond Geis; Pari V Pandharipande; James A Brink; Keith J Dreyer
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2018-06-26       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 2.  Explainable medical imaging AI needs human-centered design: guidelines and evidence from a systematic review.

Authors:  Haomin Chen; Catalina Gomez; Chien-Ming Huang; Mathias Unberath
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2022-10-19

3.  Automatic inference model construction for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodule: Explanation adequacy, inference accuracy, and experts' knowledge.

Authors:  Masami Kawagishi; Takeshi Kubo; Ryo Sakamoto; Masahiro Yakami; Koji Fujimoto; Gakuto Aoyama; Yutaka Emoto; Hiroyuki Sekiguchi; Koji Sakai; Yoshio Iizuka; Mizuho Nishio; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Kaori Togashi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-16       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Leveraging Expert Knowledge to Improve Machine-Learned Decision Support Systems.

Authors:  Finn Kuusisto; Inês Dutra; Mai Elezaby; Eneida A Mendonça; Jude Shavlik; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Jt Summits Transl Sci Proc       Date:  2015-03-25

5.  Decision support analysis for risk identification and control of patients affected by COVID-19 based on Bayesian Networks.

Authors:  Jiang Shen; Fusheng Liu; Man Xu; Lipeng Fu; Zhenhe Dong; Jiachao Wu
Journal:  Expert Syst Appl       Date:  2022-01-15       Impact factor: 6.954

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.