Literature DB >> 23394782

Antimüllerian hormone in gonadotropin releasing-hormone antagonist cycles: prediction of ovarian response and cumulative treatment outcome in good-prognosis patients.

Joan-Carles Arce1, Antonio La Marca, Bjarke Mirner Klein, Anders Nyboe Andersen, Richard Fleming.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationships between serum antimüllerian hormone (AMH) and ovarian response and treatment outcomes in good-prognosis patients undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation using a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist protocol.
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of data prospectively collected in a randomized, assessor-blind trial comparing two different gonadotropin preparations with respect to ongoing pregnancy rate.
SETTING: Twenty-five centers in seven countries. PATIENT(S): 749 women, aged 21 to 34 years, with primary diagnosis of infertility being unexplained infertility or mild male factor infertility and with serum follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level 1-12 IU/L and antral follicle count (AFC) ≥10. INTERVENTION(S): Controlled ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hphMG) or recombinant FSH in a GnRH antagonist cycle with compulsory single-blastocyst transfer and potential subsequent 1-year cryopreserved blastocyst replacement in natural cycles. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Relationships between AMH at start of stimulation and ovarian response and treatment outcome. RESULT(S): Serum AMH concentration was strongly correlated with oocyte yield: AMH accounted for 85%, FSH for 14%, and inhibin B and AFC for <1% each of the explained variation in oocyte yield. Also, AMH showed a high accuracy for the prediction of poor (≤3 oocytes) and high response (≥15 oocytes), which was statistically significantly better than basal FSH, AFC, or inhibin B. AMH was statistically significantly positively associated with ongoing pregnancy rate in the fresh cycle as well as with the 1-year cumulative ongoing pregnancy and live-birth rates. CONCLUSION(S): There is a positive relationship between AMH and oocyte yield in GnRH antagonist cycles, and AMH is the best predictor for identifying patients with poor and high ovarian response. The positive association between AMH and cumulative live-birth rates after fresh and cryopreserved cycles reflects the availability of more oocytes/blastocysts, not higher quality. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT00884221.
Copyright © 2013 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23394782     DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.12.048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  35 in total

1.  The role of serum AMH and FF AMH in predicting pregnancy outcome in the fresh cycle of IVF/ICSI: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Lingnv Yao; Wei Zhang; Hong Li; Wenqin Lin
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-02-15

2.  Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing continuation of assisted reproductive technology with conversion to intrauterine insemination in patients with low follicle numbers.

Authors:  Bo Yu; Sunni Mumford; G Donald Royster; James Segars; Alicia Y Armstrong
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2014-06-18       Impact factor: 7.329

3.  Is anti-Müllerian hormone associated with IVF outcomes in young patients with diminished ovarian reserve?

Authors:  Nigel Pereira; Robert Setton; Allison C Petrini; Jovana P Lekovich; Rony T Elias; Steven D Spandorfer
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-02-22

Review 4.  Anti-Müllerian hormone as a marker of ovarian reserve: What have we learned, and what should we know?

Authors:  Akira Iwase; Tomoko Nakamura; Satoko Osuka; Sachiko Takikawa; Maki Goto; Fumitaka Kikkawa
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2015-11-23

5.  Outcomes of ovarian stimulation after treatment with chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jessica L Chan; Lauren N C Johnson; Brenda L Efymow; Mary D Sammel; Clarisa R Gracia
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  Fertility preservation in reproductive-age women facing gonadotoxic treatments.

Authors:  J Roberts; R Ronn; N Tallon; H Holzer
Journal:  Curr Oncol       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 3.677

7.  An update on the prevention of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

Authors:  Omar El Tokhy; Julia Kopeika; Tarek El-Toukhy
Journal:  Womens Health (Lond)       Date:  2016-08-19

8.  Baseline AMH Level Associated With Ovulation Following Ovulation Induction in Women With Polycystic Ovary Syndrome.

Authors:  Sunni L Mumford; Richard S Legro; Michael P Diamond; Christos Coutifaris; Anne Z Steiner; William D Schlaff; Ruben Alvero; Gregory M Christman; Peter R Casson; Hao Huang; Nanette Santoro; Esther Eisenberg; Heping Zhang; Marcelle I Cedars
Journal:  J Clin Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 5.958

Review 9.  The role of anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) in ovarian disease and infertility.

Authors:  Jure Bedenk; Eda Vrtačnik-Bokal; Irma Virant-Klun
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2019-11-21       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  Measurement of antral follicle count in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization treatment: results of a worldwide web-based survey.

Authors:  Mindy S Christianson; Gon Shoham; Kyle J Tobler; Yulian Zhao; Christina N Cordeiro; Milton Leong; Zeev Shoham
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2015-09-04       Impact factor: 3.412

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.