Literature DB >> 23392532

Decision-making in polydrug amphetamine-type stimulant users: an fMRI study.

Philip Koester1, Kirsten G Volz, Marc Tittgemeyer, Daniel Wagner, Benjamin Becker, Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank, Joerg Daumann.   

Abstract

Qualitative poor decision-making and associated altered neuronal activation patterns have been described for the users of several drugs, amongst others for stimulants like amphetamine and MDMA. Deficits in decision-making might be caused by an augmented attraction to short-term rewarding properties despite negative long-term consequences, leading to rigid stimulus-response patterns. In the present imaging study, we investigated decision-making and associated neuronal activation in three groups differing in their exposure to amphetamine and MDMA. An established paradigm on risky choices was used to evaluate decision-making performance and corresponding functional magnet resonance imaging (fMRI) activation. Subjects could choose between a low-risk control gamble and an experimental gamble, which always differed in the probability of winning or losing, as well as the magnitudes of monetary gain or loss. Experienced users (EU), users with low exposure to stimulants and drug-naive controls, did not differ from each other in behavioral performance. In accordance with our hypotheses, the anticipation of reward led to an activation of primarily the frontal cortex and the striatum in low-exposure users and drug-naive controls. In contrast, frontal and parietal activation was observed in all groups when the actual outcome of an experimental gamble was presented. EU displayed more activation compared to both control groups when there was a high probability of winning. The study at hand supports the hypothesis that neuronal activation patterns might even differ between drug users and healthy controls when no behavioral deficits are apparent. In EU, the probability of the occurrence of an event has more influence on neuronal activation than on the actual magnitude of reinforcing properties of this event.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392532      PMCID: PMC3682139          DOI: 10.1038/npp.2013.43

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology        ISSN: 0893-133X            Impact factor:   7.853


  50 in total

1.  Anticipation of increasing monetary reward selectively recruits nucleus accumbens.

Authors:  B Knutson; C M Adams; G W Fong; D Hommer
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The Neurobiology of Addiction: Where We Have Been and Where We Are Going.

Authors:  George F Koob; Eric J Simon
Journal:  J Drug Issues       Date:  2009-01

4.  Smoking and structural brain deficits: a volumetric MR investigation.

Authors:  Jürgen Gallinat; Eva Meisenzahl; Leslie K Jacobsen; Peter Kalus; Jeffrey Bierbrauer; Thorsten Kienast; Henning Witthaus; Karolina Leopold; Frank Seifert; Florian Schubert; Mario Staedtgen
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 5.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Bayesian analysis of neuroimaging data in FSL.

Authors:  Mark W Woolrich; Saad Jbabdi; Brian Patenaude; Michael Chappell; Salima Makni; Timothy Behrens; Christian Beckmann; Mark Jenkinson; Stephen M Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-11-13       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Evidence of increased activation underlying cognitive control in ecstasy and cannabis users.

Authors:  Gloria M P Roberts; Hugh Garavan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Diffusion tensor imaging in MDMA users and controls: association with decision making.

Authors:  F Gerard Moeller; Joel L Steinberg; Scott D Lane; Matthew Buzby; Alan C Swann; Khader M Hasan; Larry A Kramer; Ponnada A Narayana
Journal:  Am J Drug Alcohol Abuse       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 3.829

9.  Sustained effects of ecstasy on the human brain: a prospective neuroimaging study in novel users.

Authors:  Maartje M L de Win; Gerry Jager; Jan Booij; Liesbeth Reneman; Thelma Schilt; Cristina Lavini; Sílvia D Olabarriaga; Gerard J den Heeten; Wim van den Brink
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Reduced cortical gray matter density in human MDMA (Ecstasy) users: a voxel-based morphometry study.

Authors:  Ronald L Cowan; In Kyoon Lyoo; Seung Mo Sung; Kyung Heup Ahn; Minue J Kim; Jaeuk Hwang; Erika Haga; Ram Lakhan Panday Vimal; Scott E Lukas; Perry F Renshaw
Journal:  Drug Alcohol Depend       Date:  2003-12-11       Impact factor: 4.492

View more
  2 in total

1.  Neuroimaging Impaired Response Inhibition and Salience Attribution in Human Drug Addiction: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Anna Zilverstand; Anna S Huang; Nelly Alia-Klein; Rita Z Goldstein
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  Inferior frontal gyrus preserves working memory and emotional learning under conditions of impaired noradrenergic signaling.

Authors:  Benjamin Becker; Lucas Androsch; Ralph T Jahn; Therese Alich; Nadine Striepens; Sebastian Markett; Wolfgang Maier; René Hurlemann
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-12-17       Impact factor: 3.558

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.