Literature DB >> 23392348

Esophageal perforation: clinical patterns and outcomes from a patient cohort of Western Norway.

Jon Arne Søreide1, Andri Konradsson, Oddvar M Sandvik, Kjell Øvrebø, Asgaut Viste.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophageal perforation is a rare, often life-threatening condition, and management remains challenging.
METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive patients with esophageal perforation treated at two university hospitals between 2000 and 2010. Pertinent data from hospital records were retrieved for statistical calculations and evaluation of perforation score.
RESULTS: Forty-seven patients [47% female, median age 62 years (range 15-88)] were included. The annual incidence was 4.7/1,000,000. Perforations were spontaneous in 14 patients (30%), iatrogenic in 25 (53%), and caused by trauma and foreign body impaction in 8 patients (17%). ASA score (p = 0.004), perforation localization (p = 0.001), diagnostic delay (p = 0.002), and perforation score (p < 0.001) differed significantly between patient groups with different etiology, but not between groups with different outcomes. Early diagnosis (≤24 h) was significantly associated with a low perforation score (p = 0.033). A non-operative approach was employed in 26 patients (55%) - more commonly for proximally localized perforations (p = 0.045). The non-operative group showed lower severe complication rates (p = 0.033), shorter ICU stays (p < 0.001) and durations of mechanical ventilation (p = 0.022). The overall 30-day mortality was 23.4%.
CONCLUSION: Careful clinical evaluation and appropriate, individualized treatment are important. The high mortality may be partly explained by the underlying disease and the complexity of the clinical condition in many patients.
Copyright © 2013 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392348     DOI: 10.1159/000346479

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dig Surg        ISSN: 0253-4886            Impact factor:   2.588


  4 in total

1.  Conservative treatment of esophageal perforation related to a peptic ulcer with pyloric stenosis.

Authors:  Ryo Tanaka; Shin-Ichi Kosugi; Daisuke Sato; Hiroshi Hirukawa; Tetsuya Tada; Hiroshi Ichikawa; Takaaki Hanyu; Takashi Ishikawa; Takashi Kobayashi; Toshifumi Wakai
Journal:  Clin J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-05-18

2.  Predictors for failure of stent treatment for benign esophageal perforations - a single center 10-year experience.

Authors:  Saga Persson; Peter Elbe; Ioannis Rouvelas; Mats Lindblad; Koshi Kumagai; Lars Lundell; Magnus Nilsson; Jon A Tsai
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-08-14       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Use of the blue cotton screen method with endoscopy to detect occult esophageal foreign bodies.

Authors:  Yan Xia; Fan Zhang; Hong Xu; Weiran Xu
Journal:  Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne       Date:  2017-12-29       Impact factor: 1.195

4.  Challenges in the diagnosis of Boerhaave syndrome: A case report.

Authors:  Ching-Hsuane Tzeng; Wei-Kung Chen; Huei-Chun Lu; Hsin-Hung Chen; Kuan-I Lee; Yung-Shun Wu; Feng-You Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 1.817

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.