Literature DB >> 23392143

Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) for local excision of benign neoplasms and early-stage rectal cancer: efficacy and outcomes in the first 50 patients.

Matthew R Albert1, Sam B Atallah, Teresa C deBeche-Adams, Seema Izfar, Sergio W Larach.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Since its inception in 2009, transanal minimally invasive surgery has been used increasingly in the United States and internationally as an alternative to local excision and transanal endoscopic microsurgery for local excision of neoplasms in the distal and mid rectum. Despite its increasing acceptance, the clinical benefits of transanal minimally invasive surgery have not yet been validated.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to assess the adequacy of transanal minimally invasive surgery for the local excision of benign and malignant lesions of the rectum.
DESIGN: This is a retrospective analysis of consecutive patients who underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision of neoplasms at a single institution. SETTINGS: The study was conducted by a single group of colorectal surgeons at a tertiary referral center. PATIENTS: Eligible patients with early-stage rectal cancer and benign neoplasms were offered transanal minimally invasive surgery as a means for local excision. Data from these patients were collected prospectively in a registry. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures included the feasibility of transanal minimally invasive surgery for local excision, resection quality, and short-term clinical results.
RESULTS: : Fifty patients underwent transanal minimally invasive surgery between July 2009 and December 2011. Twenty-five benign neoplasms, 23 malignant lesions, and 2 neuroendocrine tumors were excised. All lesions were excised using transanal minimally invasive surgery without conversion to an alternate transanal platform. The average length of stay was 0.6 days (range, 0-6), and 68% of patients were discharged on the day of surgery. The average distance from the anal verge was 8.1 cm (range, 3-14 cm). All lesions were excised completely with only 2 fragmented specimens (4%). All specimens were removed with grossly negative margins, although 3 (6%) were found to have microscopically positive margins on final pathology. There were 2 recurrences (4%) at 6- and 18-month follow-up. Early complications occurred in 3 patients (6%). No long-term complications were observed at a median follow-up of 20 months. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective nature and midterm follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: Transanal minimally invasive surgery is an advanced transanal platform that provides a safe and effective method for resecting benign neoplasms, as well as carefully selected, early-stage malignancies of the mid and distal rectum.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23392143     DOI: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31827ca313

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  76 in total

Review 1.  Oncological outcomes of local excision compared with radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Irshad Shaikh; Alan Askari; Suzana Ourû; Janindra Warusavitarne; Thanos Athanasiou; Omar Faiz
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2014-11-04       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Transanal endoscopic resection with peritoneal entry: a word of caution.

Authors:  George Molina; Liliana Bordeianou; Paul Shellito; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Shifting Paradigms in Minimally Invasive Surgery: Applications of Transanal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery in Colorectal Surgery.

Authors:  Grace Clara Lee; Patricia Sylla
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 4.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery.

Authors:  Teresa deBeche-Adams; George Nassif
Journal:  Clin Colon Rectal Surg       Date:  2015-09

Review 5.  Transanal Minimally Invasive Surgery: State of the Art.

Authors:  D S Keller; E M Haas
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2015-11-25       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  The transrectal single port laparoscopic radical prostatectomy in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Oktay Akça; Homayoun Zargar; Riccardo Autorino; Luis Felipe Brandao; Ahmet Selçuk Gürler; Abdullah Avşar; Rahim Horuz; Selami Albayrak
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2015-06

Review 7.  Robotic colorectal surgery: summary of the current evidence.

Authors:  E H Aly
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-09-01       Impact factor: 2.571

8.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): is one better than the other?

Authors:  Sam B Atallah; Matthew R Albert
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Current evidence in gastrointestinal surgery: natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES).

Authors:  Deborah S Keller; Conor P Delaney
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Transanal minimally invasive surgery for rectal polyps and selected malignant tumors: caution concerning intermediate-term functional results.

Authors:  S H E M Clermonts; Y T van Loon; A H W Schiphorst; D K Wasowicz; D D E Zimmerman
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 2.571

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.