Literature DB >> 23391629

Open ankle arthrodeses via an anterior approach.

David Gordon1, Robyn Zicker, Nicholas Cullen, Dishan Singh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In open ankle arthrodesis, debate remains as to which surgical approach and fixation devices should be used. The purpose of this study was to identify union, complication, and patient satisfaction rates of ankle fusions performed at our institution, using the plane between extensor hallucis longus and tibialis anterior with medial tibiotalar screw internal fixation.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all isolated primary fusions between 2005 and 2009. Eighty-two ankles were identified in 73 patients. All patient records were reviewed, and 57 patients (65 ankles) attended for clinical evaluation and scoring. Age range at surgery was 18 to 75 years (mean, 56.1 years); 8 patients were smokers. Diagnoses were trauma in 52 patients (63%), osteoarthritis in 17, rheumatoid arthritis in 7, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease in 3, congenital talipes equinovarus in 2, and talar avascular necrosis in 1. Follow-up range was 7 months to 8.3 years (mean, 4 years).
RESULTS: Time to union ranged from 8 to 39 weeks (mean, 13.3) with a union rate of 100%. The AOFAS range was 12 to 93 (mean, 70). Eighty percent were "very satisfied" or "satisfied." Major complication rate was 14.6%: 7 malalignments; 3 wound problems; 2 complex regional pain syndrome; and 2 delayed unions, both smokers.
CONCLUSIONS: An excellent union rate, high patient satisfaction, and low complication rate were achieved with this technique. Varus malalignment and persistent pain resulted in dissatisfaction. Many patients remained highly active, and bilaterally fused patients functioned as well as unilateral ones. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, retrospective case series.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23391629     DOI: 10.1177/1071100713477385

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  5 in total

Review 1.  Total ankle arthroplasty versus ankle arthrodesis-a comparison of outcomes over the last decade.

Authors:  Cort D Lawton; Bennet A Butler; Robert G Dekker; Adam Prescott; Anish R Kadakia
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 2.359

2.  Ankle Arthrodesis: A Comparison of Anterior Approach and Transfibular Approach.

Authors:  Jeon-Gyo Kim; Dong-Jun Ha; Heui-Chul Gwak; Chang-Wan Kim; Jung-Han Kim; Seon-Joo Lee; Young-Jun Kim; Chang-Rak Lee; Ji-Hwan Park
Journal:  Clin Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-08-22

3.  Foot Assessment Clinical Scales in Charcot-Marie-Tooth Patients: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Chiara Rambelli; Davide Mazzoli; Martina Galletti; Giacomo Basini; Paolo Zerbinati; Paolo Prati; Francesca Mascioli; Stefano Masiero; Andrea Merlo
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-06-24       Impact factor: 3.473

Review 4.  Open and arthroscopic surgical anatomy of the ankle.

Authors:  Rachel M Frank; Andrew R Hsu; Christopher E Gross; David M Walton; Simon Lee
Journal:  Anat Res Int       Date:  2013-10-29

5.  Total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis affect the biomechanics of the inner foot differently.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Duo Wai-Chi Wong; Qitao Tan; Zengyong Li; Ming Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.