Literature DB >> 23391592

Improving the perioperative value of care for vulnerable kidney transplant recipients.

David J Taber1, Nicole A Pilch, John W McGillicuddy, Charles F Bratton, Angello Lin, Kenneth D Chavin, Prabhakar K Baliga.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The increased use of marginal donors, an aging recipient population, and Diagnosis-Related Group (DRG) cost restraints place significant pressures on kidney transplant centers to maintain financial viability while sustaining high quality outcomes. We engaged in a quality initiative in delayed graft function (DGF) kidney transplant recipients aimed at improving safe and efficient discharge. STUDY
DESIGN: This was a retrospective analysis of national databases comparing the perioperative outcomes and costs for our transplant center and national benchmark values for kidney recipients undergoing transplantation between October 2008 and March 2012. During this time, we developed and implemented quality initiatives aimed at improving health care value for kidney transplant recipients, and focused efforts particularly in patients who developed DGF. Pediatric patients and multiorgan transplant recipients were excluded.
RESULTS: There were 583 kidney transplants performed at our institution; these were compared with 37,712 transplants available from national data. Rates of DGF increased at our institution from 6% to 25% but were steady at 27% nationally. The quality initiatives improved hospital length of stay (LOS) in DGF patients from an average of 8 days initially to 4 days at study end, which reduced overall LOS from 3.6 ± 1.5 days to 3.3 ± 0.8 days (p = 0.021); national LOS was consistent at a mean of 10 days; hospital costs decreased by 42% at our institution, while national rates rose by 12%. Our institutional 30-day readmission rates in all patients and those with DGF were significantly lower than national rates across the entire study period (9% vs 15% and 12% vs 18%, respectively).
CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate that health care value can be significantly improved in kidney transplant recipients, particularly in DGF patients, by implementing a multidisciplinary initiative aimed at safely and efficiently discharging patients.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23391592     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.023

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  4 in total

1.  Impact of the New Kidney Allocation System on Perioperative Outcomes and Costs in Kidney Transplantation.

Authors:  David J Taber; Derek DuBay; John W McGillicuddy; Satish Nadig; Charles F Bratton; Kenneth D Chavin; Prabhakar K Baliga
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2017-01-31       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  Inclusion of dynamic clinical data improves the predictive performance of a 30-day readmission risk model in kidney transplantation.

Authors:  David J Taber; Arun P Palanisamy; Titte R Srinivas; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; John Odeghe; Kenneth D Chavin; Leonard E Egede; Prabhakar K Baliga
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Improving Medication Safety and Cardiovascular Risk Factor Control to Mitigate Disparities in African-American Kidney Transplant Recipients: Design and Methods.

Authors:  Andrew J Cole; Reginald W Johnson; Leonard E Egede; Prabhakar K Baliga; David J Taber
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials Commun       Date:  2017-11-23

4.  Improving Transplant Medication Safety Through a Technology and Pharmacist Intervention (ISTEP): Protocol for a Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Casey L Hall; Cory E Fominaya; Mulugeta Gebregziabher; Sherry K Milfred-LaForest; Kelsey M Rife; David J Taber
Journal:  JMIR Res Protoc       Date:  2019-10-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.