AIMS: The pathophysiology of aortic stenosis shares many similarities with atherosclerosis and skeletal bone formation. Using non-invasive imaging, we compared aortic valve calcification and inflammation activity with that measured in atherosclerosis and bone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Positron emission and computed tomography was performed using 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF, calcification) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG, inflammation) in 101 patients with calcific aortic valve disease (81 aortic stenosis and 20 aortic sclerosis). Calcium scores and positron emission tomography tracer activity (tissue-to-background ratio; TBR) were measured in the aortic valve, coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and bone. Over 90% of the cohort had coexistent calcific atheroma, yet correlations between calcium scores were weak or absent (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.015, P = 0.222; valve vs. coronaries r(2) = 0.039, P = 0.049) as were associations between calcium scores and bone mineral density (BMD vs. valve r(2) = 0.000, P = 0.766; vs. aorta r(2) = 0.052, P = 0.025; vs. coronaries r(2) = 0.016, P = 0.210). 18F-NaF activity in the valve was 28% higher than in the aorta (TBR: 2.66 ± 0.84 vs. 2.11 ± 0.31, respectively, P < 0.001) and correlated more strongly with the severity of aortic stenosis (r(2) = 0.419, P < 0.001) than 18F-NaF activity outwith the valve (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.167, P < 0.001; valve vs. coronary arteries r(2) = 0.174, P < 0.001; valve vs. bone r(2) = 0.001, P = 0.806). In contrast, 18F-FDG activity was lower in the aortic valve than the aortic atheroma (TBR: 1.56 ± 0.21 vs. 1.81 ± 0.24, respectively, P < 0.001) and more closely associated with uptake outwith the valve (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.327, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with aortic stenosis, disease activity appears to be determined by local calcific processes within the valve that are distinct from atherosclerosis and skeletal bone metabolism.
AIMS: The pathophysiology of aortic stenosis shares many similarities with atherosclerosis and skeletal bone formation. Using non-invasive imaging, we compared aortic valve calcification and inflammation activity with that measured in atherosclerosis and bone. METHODS AND RESULTS: Positron emission and computed tomography was performed using 18F-sodium fluoride (18F-NaF, calcification) and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG, inflammation) in 101 patients with calcific aortic valve disease (81 aortic stenosis and 20 aortic sclerosis). Calcium scores and positron emission tomography tracer activity (tissue-to-background ratio; TBR) were measured in the aortic valve, coronary arteries, thoracic aorta, and bone. Over 90% of the cohort had coexistent calcific atheroma, yet correlations between calcium scores were weak or absent (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.015, P = 0.222; valve vs. coronaries r(2) = 0.039, P = 0.049) as were associations between calcium scores and bone mineral density (BMD vs. valve r(2) = 0.000, P = 0.766; vs. aorta r(2) = 0.052, P = 0.025; vs. coronaries r(2) = 0.016, P = 0.210). 18F-NaF activity in the valve was 28% higher than in the aorta (TBR: 2.66 ± 0.84 vs. 2.11 ± 0.31, respectively, P < 0.001) and correlated more strongly with the severity of aortic stenosis (r(2) = 0.419, P < 0.001) than 18F-NaF activity outwith the valve (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.167, P < 0.001; valve vs. coronary arteries r(2) = 0.174, P < 0.001; valve vs. bone r(2) = 0.001, P = 0.806). In contrast, 18F-FDG activity was lower in the aortic valve than the aortic atheroma (TBR: 1.56 ± 0.21 vs. 1.81 ± 0.24, respectively, P < 0.001) and more closely associated with uptake outwith the valve (valve vs. aorta r(2) = 0.327, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with aortic stenosis, disease activity appears to be determined by local calcific processes within the valve that are distinct from atherosclerosis and skeletal bone metabolism.
Authors: T Derlin; T Janssen; J Salamon; S Veldhoen; J D Busch; G Schön; J Herrmann; F O Henes; P Bannas; G Adam Journal: Osteoporos Int Date: 2014-08-16 Impact factor: 4.507
Authors: Nicolas Perrot; Sébastien Thériault; Christian Dina; Hao Yu Chen; S Matthijs Boekholdt; Sidwell Rigade; Audrey-Anne Després; Anthony Poulin; Romain Capoulade; Thierry Le Tourneau; David Messika-Zeitoun; Mikaël Trottier; Michel Tessier; Jean Guimond; Maxime Nadeau; James C Engert; Kay-Tee Khaw; Nicholas J Wareham; Marc R Dweck; Patrick Mathieu; Philippe Pibarot; Jean-Jacques Schott; George Thanassoulis; Marie-Annick Clavel; Yohan Bossé; Benoit J Arsenault Journal: JAMA Cardiol Date: 2019-07-01 Impact factor: 14.676
Authors: Daniele Massera; Shuo Xu; Traci M Bartz; Anna E Bortnick; Joachim H Ix; Michel Chonchol; David S Owens; Eddy Barasch; Julius M Gardin; John S Gottdiener; John R Robbins; David S Siscovick; Jorge R Kizer Journal: Arch Osteoporos Date: 2017-05-30 Impact factor: 2.617
Authors: Björn A Blomberg; Anders Thomassen; Richard A P Takx; Mie H Vilstrup; Søren Hess; Anne L Nielsen; Axel C P Diederichsen; Hans Mickley; Abass Alavi; Poul F Høilund-Carlsen Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2013-12-05 Impact factor: 5.952