Literature DB >> 23391233

Assessment of lameness in sows using gait, footprints, postural behaviour and foot lesion analysis.

J Grégoire1, R Bergeron, S D'Allaire, M-C Meunier-Salaün, N Devillers.   

Abstract

Lameness in sows has an economic impact on pig production and is a major welfare concern. The aim of the present project was to develop methods to evaluate and quantify lameness in breeding sows. Five methods to study lameness were compared between themselves and with visual gait scoring used as a reference: footprint analysis, kinematics, accelerometers, lying-to-standing transition and foot lesion observation. Fifty sows of various parities and stages of gestation were selected using visual gait scoring and distributed into three groups: lame (L), mildly lame (ML) and non-lame (NL). They were then tested using each method. Kinematics showed that L sows had a lower walking speed than NL sows (L: 0.83 ± 0.04, NL: 0.96 ± 0.03 m/s; P < 0.05), a shorter stride length than ML sows (L: 93.0 ± 2.6, ML: 101.2 ± 1.5 cm; P < 0.05) and a longer stance time than ML and NL sows (L: 0.83 ± 0.03, ML: 0.70 ± 0.03, NL: 0.69 ± 0.02 s; P < 0.01). Accelerometer measurements revealed that L sows spent less time standing over a 24-h period (L: 6.3 ± 1.3, ML: 13.7 ± 2.4, NL: 14.5 ± 2.4%; P < 0.01), lay down earlier after feeding (L: 33.4 ± 4.6, ML: 41.7 ± 3.1, NL: 48.6 ± 2.9 min; P < 0.05) and tended to step more often during the hour following feeding (L: 10.1 ± 2.0, ML: 6.1 ± 0.5, NL: 5.4 ± 0.4 step/min standing; P = 0.06) than NL sows, with the ML sows having intermediate values. Visual observation of back posture showed that 64% of L sows had an arched back, compared with only 14% in NL sows (P = 0.02). Finally, footprint analysis and observation of lying-to-standing transition and foot lesions were not successful in detecting significant differences between L, ML and NL sows. In conclusion, several quantitative variables obtained from kinematics and accelerometers proved to be successful in identifying reliable indicators of lameness in sows. Further work is needed to relate these indicators with causes of lameness and to develop methods that can be implemented on the farm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23391233     DOI: 10.1017/S1751731113000098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Animal        ISSN: 1751-7311            Impact factor:   3.240


  13 in total

1.  Comparative Study of the Effects of Two Dietary Sources of Vitamin D on the Bone Metabolism, Welfare and Birth Progress of Sows Fed Protein- and Phosphorus-Reduced Diets.

Authors:  Michael Lütke-Dörhoff; Jochen Schulz; Heiner Westendarp; Christian Visscher; Mirja R Wilkens
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 3.231

2.  Testing optimal methods to compare horse postures using geometric morphometrics.

Authors:  Emilie Sénèque; Stéphane Morisset; Clémence Lesimple; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  A Systematic Review on Validated Precision Livestock Farming Technologies for Pig Production and Its Potential to Assess Animal Welfare.

Authors:  Yaneth Gómez; Anna H Stygar; Iris J M M Boumans; Eddie A M Bokkers; Lene J Pedersen; Jarkko K Niemi; Matti Pastell; Xavier Manteca; Pol Llonch
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-05-14

4.  Pressure mat analysis of the longitudinal development of pig locomotion in growing pigs after weaning.

Authors:  Ellen Meijer; Christian P Bertholle; Maarten Oosterlinck; Franz Josef van der Staay; Willem Back; Arie van Nes
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 2.741

5.  Pressure mat analysis of naturally occurring lameness in young pigs after weaning.

Authors:  Ellen Meijer; Maarten Oosterlinck; Arie van Nes; Willem Back; Franz Josef van der Staay
Journal:  BMC Vet Res       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Wireless inertial measurement of head kinematics in freely-moving rats.

Authors:  Matthieu O Pasquet; Matthieu Tihy; Aurélie Gourgeon; Marco N Pompili; Bill P Godsil; Clément Léna; Guillaume P Dugué
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-10-21       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Could posture reflect welfare state? A study using geometric morphometrics in riding school horses.

Authors:  Emilie Sénèque; Clémence Lesimple; Stéphane Morisset; Martine Hausberger
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-05       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  The in-utero experience of piglets born from sows with lameness shapes their life trajectory.

Authors:  Marisol Parada Sarmiento; Thiago Bernardino; Patricia Tatemoto; Gina Polo; Adroaldo José Zanella
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Locomotion Disorders and Skin and Claw Lesions in Gestating Sows Housed in Dynamic versus Static Groups.

Authors:  Emilie-Julie Bos; Dominiek Maes; Miriam M J van Riet; Sam Millet; Bart Ampe; Geert P J Janssens; Frank A M Tuyttens
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 10.  A Review of Pain Assessment in Pigs.

Authors:  Sarah H Ison; R Eddie Clutton; Pierpaolo Di Giminiani; Kenneth M D Rutherford
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2016-11-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.