Literature DB >> 23391085

Endovascular treatment for extensive aortoiliac artery reconstruction: a single-center experience based on 1712 interventions.

Sebastian Sixt1, Hans Krankenberg, Charlotte Möhrle, Mathias Kaspar, Thilo Tübler, Aljoscha Rastan, Klaus Brechtel, Roland Macharzina, Franz-Josef Neumann, Thomas Zeller.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the clinical and technical outcomes following endovascular therapy for aortoiliac occlusive disease, including complex reconstruction of the aortic bifurcation.
METHODS: A retrospective database search identified 1184 consecutive patients (864 men; mean age 64±10 years) who underwent 1712 procedures to treat target lesions in the distal aorta and iliac arteries from September 1996 to December 2006. The intended strategy was to open only one femoral access site primarily, so a second puncture was needed only for the kissing balloon technique at the aortic bifurcation. The primary endpoint was a 1-year duplex-based primary patency; secondary endpoints included acute technical success (residual stenosis <30%), secondary patency, and target lesion revascularization (TLR). Results were stratified by lesion morphology, which was classified according to the TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus (TASC II) document.
RESULTS: Most of the interventions were done in the iliac arteries (n=1337); 292 cases involved the aortic bifurcation, and 83 cases were in the distal aorta/aortic bifurcation. The mean follow-up was 3.24 years (range 0-12.7). In the entire study cohort, the 12- and 24-month restenosis, TLR, and primary/secondary patency rates did not differ among TASC II A-D subgroups. The symptom-driven TLR in the entire cohort was 8% and 9% at the 12- and 24-month follow-up, leading to secondary patency rates of 96% and 91% in the entire cohort. Outcomes for complex interventions in the distal aorta or aortic bifurcation did not differ significantly compared to the total cohort. The overall survival without restenosis, amputation, or surgery in TASC II subgroups A+B was higher (69.6%±1.5%) compared to TASC II C+D lesions (62.8%±1.9%, p=0.001).
CONCLUSION: The indication for percutaneous intervention in aortoiliac occlusive disease can be extended to complex TASC C and D lesions in experienced endovascular centers, even if complex reconstruction of the distal aorta or the aortic bifurcation is indicated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23391085     DOI: 10.1583/12-4014.1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endovasc Ther        ISSN: 1526-6028            Impact factor:   3.487


  9 in total

Review 1.  Strategies for managing aortoiliac occlusions: access, treatment and outcomes.

Authors:  Daniel G Clair; Jocelyn M Beach
Journal:  Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther       Date:  2015-05

2.  The impact of inflow treatment for claudicants with both aortoiliac and femoropopliteal occlusive disease.

Authors:  Takashi Maekawa; Kimihiro Komori; Akio Kodama; Hiroshi Banno; Hiroshi Narita; Masayuki Sugimoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  2016-09-01       Impact factor: 2.549

Review 3.  Overview of classification systems in peripheral artery disease.

Authors:  Rulon L Hardman; Omid Jazaeri; J Yi; M Smith; Rajan Gupta
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.513

4.  Patient doses in endovascular and hybrid revascularization of aortoiliac segment.

Authors:  Stefan Stanev; Desislava Kostova-Lefterova; Svetla Dineva
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2021-10-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Long-term results of endovascular reconstruction for aortoiliac occlusive disease.

Authors:  Min Yang; Bihui Zhang; Guochen Niu; Ziguang Yan; Xiaoqiang Tong; Yinghua Zou
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2021-04

6.  Long-Term Results of Crossover Bypass for Iliac Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Era of Endovascular Treatment: The Re-ACTION Study (Retrospective Assessment of Crossover Bypass as a Treatment for Iliac LesiONs).

Authors:  Noriyuki Miyama; Hiroyoshi Komai; Takashi Nakamura; Masahiro Iwahashi; Nobuhiko Mukobara; Masato Yoshida; Hironobu Fujimura; Takaki Sugimoto; Hidenori Asada; Nobuhiro Tanimura; Takashi Azami; Masatoshi Kawata; Yoshihiko Tsuji; Noboru Wakita; Hitoshi Ogino; Shunya Shindo; Atsutoshi Hatada; Takanori Oka
Journal:  Ann Vasc Dis       Date:  2018-06-25

7.  Meta-analysis of Individual Patient Data After Kissing Stent Treatment for Aortoiliac Occlusive Disease.

Authors:  Erik Groot Jebbink; Suzanne Holewijn; Michel Versluis; Frederike Grimme; Jan Willem Hinnen; Sebastian Sixt; John F Angle; Walter Dorigo; Michel M P J Reijnen
Journal:  J Endovasc Ther       Date:  2018-11-30       Impact factor: 3.487

8.  Midterm results of kissing stent reconstruction of the aortoiliac bifurcation.

Authors:  Deniz Serefli; Onur Saydam; A Yaprak Engin; Mehmet Atay
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 1.859

Review 9.  Role of the latest endovascular technology in the treatment of intermittent claudication.

Authors:  Shigeo Ichihashi; Kimihiko Kichikawa
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 2.423

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.