Telomeres are composed of simple tandem DNA repeats that protect the ends of linear chromosomes from replicative erosion or inappropriate DNA damage response mechanisms. The mammalian Protection Of Telomeres (POT1) protein interacts with single-stranded telomeric DNA and can exert positive and negative effects on telomere length. Of four distinct POT1 homologs in the roundworm Caenorhabditis elegans, deficiency for POT-1 or POT-2 resulted in progressive telomere elongation that occurred because both proteins negatively regulate telomerase. We created a POT-1::mCherry fusion protein that forms discrete foci at C. elegans telomeres, independent of POT-2, allowing for live analysis of telomere dynamics. Transgenic pot-1::mCherry repressed telomerase in pot-1 mutants. Animals deficient for pot-1, but not pot-2, displayed mildly enhanced telomere erosion rates in the absence of the telomerase reverse transcriptase, trt-1. However, trt-1; pot-1 double mutants exhibited delayed senescence in comparison to trt-1 animals, and senescence was further delayed in trt-1; pot-2; pot-1 triple mutants, some of which survived robustly in the absence of telomerase. Our results indicate that POT-1 and POT-2 play independent roles in suppressing a telomerase-independent telomere maintenance pathway but may function together to repress telomerase.
Telomeres are composed of simple tandem DNA repeats that protect the ends of linear chromosomes from replicative erosion or inappropriate DNA damage response mechanisms. The mammalian Protection Of Telomeres (POT1) protein interacts with single-stranded telomeric DNA and can exert positive and negative effects on telomere length. Of four distinct POT1 homologs in the roundwormCaenorhabditis elegans, deficiency for POT-1 or POT-2 resulted in progressive telomere elongation that occurred because both proteins negatively regulate telomerase. We created a POT-1::mCherry fusion protein that forms discrete foci at C. elegans telomeres, independent of POT-2, allowing for live analysis of telomere dynamics. Transgenic pot-1::mCherry repressed telomerase in pot-1 mutants. Animals deficient for pot-1, but not pot-2, displayed mildly enhanced telomere erosion rates in the absence of the telomerase reverse transcriptase, trt-1. However, trt-1; pot-1 double mutants exhibited delayed senescence in comparison to trt-1 animals, and senescence was further delayed in trt-1; pot-2; pot-1 triple mutants, some of which survived robustly in the absence of telomerase. Our results indicate that POT-1 and POT-2 play independent roles in suppressing a telomerase-independent telomere maintenance pathway but may function together to repress telomerase.
Human somatic cells have finite replicative lifespans and can enter an irreversible cell-cycle arrest, termed senescence, in response to various stresses. Senescence can occur due to progressive shortening of telomeres, which cannot be completely replicated by canonical DNA polymerases (Harley ). Telomeres are composed of simple TTAGGG repeats in vertebrates and related sequences in other organisms, such as TTAGGC repeats in Caenorhabditis elegans. To combat telomere erosion, cells can express the enzyme telomerase, which adds de novo telomere repeats to chromosome ends via reverse transcription from an RNA template (Greider and Blackburn 1989). Telomerase is expressed at high levels in germ cells and can be expressed in human somatic cells, but its expression is transient or absent altogether in more differentiated cell types (Kim ; Sharma ).The shelterin complex, composed of six mammalian telomere-binding proteins TRF1, TRF2, TIN2, POT1, RAP1, and TPP1, and its associated proteins protect telomeres from nucleases and DNA damage repair mechanisms that can lead to exacerbated telomere shortening or cellular senescence (Diotti and Loayza 2011). Shelterin components maintain telomere homeostasis by positively and negatively regulating telomere length. The double-stranded telomeric DNA-binding proteins TRF1 and TRF2 have been implicated as negative regulators of telomere length, where removal of TRF1 from telomeres or overexpression of TRF2 yielded telomere elongation or erosion, respectively (Smogorzewska ; van Steensel and de Lange 1997). TIN2 and TPP1 proteins bridge the interaction between these double-stranded telomere-binding proteins and the single-stranded telomere-binding protein, POT1, and are also considered negative regulators of telomere length as their depletion results in progressive telomere elongation (Kim ; Ye and de Lange 2004;
Ye ).Human Protection Of Telomeres 1 interacts with single-stranded telomeric DNA via two oligonucleotide/oligosaccharide (OB) folds and is primarily considered a negative regulator of telomere length (Kendellen ; Veldman ; Ye ). However, in numerous studies researchers have revealed roles for POT1 in both telomere elongation and telomere protection. POT1 overexpression (Armbruster ; Liu ) and mutant or splice-variant POT1 expression (Armbruster ; Colgin ; Kendellen ; Liu ; Loayza and De Lange 2003) can elicit telomere elongation. In addition, POT1 can inhibit telomere repeat synthesis in the presence of its binding partner TPP1 but promotes telomerase processivity in vitro in its absence (Kelleher ; Wang ).Both mousePot1 homologs promote chromosome end protection, as G-strand overhangs lengthen in Pot1b−/− cells, and end-to-end chromosome fusions occur as a result of telomere deprotection in both Pot1a−/− and Pot1b−/− cells (He , 2009; Hockemeyer , 2008; Wu ). However, disparate cellular and telomere phenotypes have been reported. For example, fibroblasts derived from Pot1a−/− mice senesced prematurely in one study (Wu ) but not in another (Hockemeyer ). In addition, Pot1b−/− cells did not prematurely senescence in one study (Hockemeyer ), but mouse embryonic fibroblasts overexpressing an OB-fold Pot1b mutant exhibited early-onset senescence in another study (He ). Moreover, telomeres from Pot1b−/− cells have been shown to either shorten or stay the same (He ; Hockemeyer , 2008), whereas Pot1a−/− cells exhibited telomere elongation (Wu ).The C. elegans genome is predicted to encode four proteins with OB folds homologous to mammalianPOT1, including a single protein with an OB1 fold, POT-1, and three proteins with OB2 folds, POT-2, POT-3, and MRT-1 (Figure 1A) (Meier ; Raices ). Previous work has illustrated that POT-1, also known as CeOB2, and POT-2, also known as CeOB1, can interact with single-stranded telomeric DNA in vitro (Raices ). In addition, this study reported elongated telomeres for both and mutant strains, although telomeres were distinctive and appeared similar to those of human cells that maintain their telomeres by a telomerase-independent telomere replication pathway termed alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT).
Figure 1
POT-1 and POT-2 are negative regulators of telomere replication. (A) A representation of the four POT-1 homologs in C. elegans. Terminal restriction fragment length analysis was performed on DNA collected from consecutive generations of (B) pot-1(tm1620), pot-2(1400), and pot-3(ok1530) single mutants, (C) outcrossed pot-2(1400) and pot-1(tm1620) single mutants, (D) wildtype and pot-1; pot-2 double mutants, (E) outcrossed pot-1::mCherry; pot-1(tm1620) strains, and (F) outcrossed pot-1::mCherry strains. Dashed line to the right of the blots indicates internal telomeric sequences.
POT-1 and POT-2 are negative regulators of telomere replication. (A) A representation of the four POT-1 homologs in C. elegans. Terminal restriction fragment length analysis was performed on DNA collected from consecutive generations of (B) pot-1(tm1620), pot-2(1400), and pot-3(ok1530) single mutants, (C) outcrossed pot-2(1400) and pot-1(tm1620) single mutants, (D) wildtype and pot-1; pot-2 double mutants, (E) outcrossed pot-1::mCherry; pot-1(tm1620) strains, and (F) outcrossed pot-1::mCherry strains. Dashed line to the right of the blots indicates internal telomeric sequences.We previously demonstrated that one of four POT1 homologs, MRT-1, is necessary for telomerase-mediated telomere repeat addition in vivo (Meier ). Here we investigate additional roles for these C. elegans proteins that contain POT1OB folds by studying telomere dynamics in and mutants. We illustrate that both POT-1 and POT-2 are negative regulators of telomerase, indicating a similar and previously unknown role for these proteins in C. elegans telomere biology. We develop a pot-1::mCherry transgene that localizes to telomeres and represses telomerase in vivo. Additionally, we demonstrate a unique role for POT-1 in telomere protection and that POT-1 and POT-2 function non-redundantly to repress a telomerase-independent telomere maintenance pathway.
Materials and Methods
Strains
Unless noted otherwise, all strains were cultured at 20° on nematode growth medium plates seeded with Escherichia coli
OP50. Strains used include Bristol N2 ancestral, CB61
, YA1059
, CB402
, CB193
, YA1197 ::pot-1::mCherry::tbb-2utr), YA1198 ::pot-1::mCherry::tbb-2utr), YA1024 , CB187
, , YA1022 , , and YA1026 .The mutation was outcrossed vs. an outcrossed stock of . and pot-1::mCherry lines were outcrossed vs. outcrossed stocks of or , respectively. Freshly isolated homozygous F2 lines were established for analysis.To create ; double mutants, a ; double mutant and a ; triple mutant were first created; phenotypically wild-type F2 progeny of ; , F1 heterozygotes were selected; and the strains that segregated only phenotypically wild-type F3 progeny were retained for analysis.To create the ; and ; double mutants, ; , ; , ; , and ; mutants were generated. Phenotypically wild-type F2 progeny of / ; / or / ; / F1 heterozygotes were selected, and strains that segregated only phenotypically wild-type F3 progeny were retained for analysis.To create ; ; triple mutants, ; ; and ; ; triple mutants were first created, phenotypically wild-type F2 progeny were selected from ; ; heterozygotes, and the strains that segregated only phenotypically wild-type F3 progeny were retained for analysis.To place the ::mCherry transgene into a mutant background, ; hermaphrodites were crossed to +; males, and phenotypically wild-type F2 progeny were singled from ; F1, and F2 that segregated only phenotypically wild-type F3 progeny were retained for analysis. ::mCherry was placed into the mutant background analogously, where ::mCherry hermaphrodites were crossed to ; males and phenotypically wildtype F2 progeny were selected.To create a pot-1::mCherry strain that expressed GFP::Histone H2B from the transgene insertion , N2 males were crossed to hermaphrodites of the strain TH32
; ::GFP + ; ::GFP::H2B] (Desai ), and the resultant F1 males were crossed with pot-1::mCherry hermaphrodites. F1 cross-progeny were singled and allowed to self-fertilize, F2 progeny were singled from animals heterozygous for both ::GFP::H2B] and pot-1::mCherry, and F3 progeny homozygous for both transgenes were selected.
Terminal restriction fragment length analysis
C. elegans genomic DNA was isolated using Gentra Puregene reagents (QIAGEN), digested with HinfI enzyme (NEB), and separated on a 0.6% agarose gel at 1.5 V/cm. Southern blotting was performed using the DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set (Roche) following the manufacturer’s instructions. A telomere probe, corresponding to the C. elegans telomeric repeat TTAGGC, was synthesized and labeled with digoxigenin (DIG)-dUTPs using the PCR DIG Probe Synthesis Kit (Roche) following the manufacturer’s instructions.
Telomere erosion rate calculation
The sizes of individual telomere bands, between 2 and 6 kb, that could be clearly followed for consecutive generations (and were distinct from bands corresponding to neighboring telomeres or to interstitial telomeric tracts) were calculated using semi-log graphs of molecular marker size and distance traveled from the well (Ahmed and Hodgkin 2000; Boerckel ; Lowden ; Meier , 2009). Data are presented as the mean ± SD.
Transgene construction
All transgene constructs were made using the MosI-mediated single-copy insertion system that allows for the incorporation of a single copy of a transgene into one specific locus in the C. elegans genome (Frokjaer-Jensen ). The pot-1::mCherry transgene was constructed using the Invitrogen Gateway Cloning kit using the positive selection marker , a germline-specific promoter , full-length genomic sequence lacking a stop codon, mCherry sequence, and the 3′ UTR. An extrachromosomal array consisting of this construct, Pglh-2::Mos1 transposase, and three fluorescent mCherry negative selection markers was introduced into Mos-1(; worms via microinjection into the germline of young adults. Progeny of injected animals were screened for loss of the Unc phenotype and for the presence of mCherry fluorescence, suggesting successful transformation of the injected extrachromosomal array. Lines with successful transformants were further propagated and progeny were screened for loss of coinjection mCherry fluorescence markers but continued rescue of the Unc phenotype, indicating successful integration of the construct. Genomic DNA prepared from these lines was tested by PCR and DNA sequencing to confirm the presence of a single-copy insertion in the Mos-1( insertion site on chromosome II. The mutation was removed from transgenic strains prior to analysis by crossing with males, singling non-Rol, non-Unc F2 from F1 with Rol F2, choosing F2 that lacked homozygotes, and selecting against . Single-copy transgene insertions were designated ::pot-1::mCherry::tbb-2utr) and ::pot-1::mCherry::tbb-2utr), which we refer to below as pot-1::mCherry.B and pot-1::mCherry.C, respectively.
DAPI staining
One-day-old adult worms were soaked in 150 µL of a 400 ng/mL DAPI in ethanol solution for 30 min or until evaporated, rehydrated in 2 mL of M9 solution overnight at 4°, and mounted in 5 µL of fresh NPG/glycerol medium. Chromosome counts were performed under ×100 magnification and a 359 excitation wavelength using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope.
POT-1::mCherry foci quantification
Live 1-day-old adult worms were mounted onto 2% agarose pads in 5 µL of tetramisole and Z stacks were taken within 2 hr of mounting under ×100 magnification and a 595-nm excitation wavelength using a Nikon Eclipse E800 microscope. Foci from individual nuclei were quantified by manually scanning through compiled Z stacks.
C-circle quantification
The C-circle amplification assay was performed as previously described (Henson ) with the following modifications: (1) the 96-nucleotide oligomer control was generated with a C. elegans telomeric sequence (5′ CCCATATCACTAA(GCCTAA)12CCTCAATTCCC 3′); (2) the DNA was resolved on an agarose gel and normalized by ethidium bromide staining, and amplified DNA was dot blotted onto a neutral nylon membrane (GE Healthcare Life Sciences) and probed with a telomeric G strand (TTAGGC)3 oligo conjugated to DIG at 37°; and (3) the membrane was washed as described for the DIG Wash and Block Buffer Set (Roche) at 37° and developed with ECF reagent (GE Life Sciences). Fluorescence signals were collected with a Typhoon Trio scanner (GE Life Sciences) and quantified with ImageQuant TL software (GE Life Sciences) using edge subtraction.
Results
POT-1 and POT-2 are negative regulators of telomere extension in vivo
We obtained strains harboring the deletions or from Shohei Mitani and verified the presence of homozygous deletions in these strains using the polymerase chain reaction. Southern blotting revealed long telomeres for genomic DNA isolated from or mutant strains that were propagated for varying numbers of generations (Figure 1B). In contrast, the deletion did not have an overt effect on telomere length (Figure 1B). Outcrossing of or mutations for 15 generations as heterozygotes, followed by isolation of homozygous mutant or strains, revealed normal telomere lengths in early generations followed by progressive telomere elongation (Figure 1C). Therefore, the telomere elongation phenotypes caused by and mutations are recessive and can be eliminated if the mutations are maintained as heterozygotes.Telomeres from and mutant strains had qualitatively similar dynamics, suggesting that POT-1 and POT-2 may perform similar functions at telomeres. The rapid appearance of smeary, long telomeres, assessed from numerous, outcrossed lines of and single mutants or ; mutants, precluded measurement of telomere elongation rates with errors of <100 bp/generation, although telomere elongation was qualitatively similar among the three genotypes (Figure 1, C and D; supporting information, Figure S1).To confirm that the mutation was responsible for the telomere elongation phenotype of outcrossed strains, single-copy transgenes designed to express wild-type POT-1 fused to a fluorescent mCherry protein at its C terminus were created, outcrossed nine times, and crossed into a background that had been outcrossed 30 times. In contrast to mutants (Figure 1C), telomere lengths in independent pot-1::mCherry; strains remained constant over many generations (Figure 1E), indicating that the progressive telomere elongation phenotype of mutants is caused by the deletion rather than a tightly linked mutation. Moreover, telomeres did not progressively lengthen or shorten for independently outcrossed pot-1::mCherry strains in a wildtype background, indicating that the POT-1::mCherry fusion protein does not perturb the ability of endogenous POT-1 to regulate telomere length (Figure 1F). However, bulk telomere length was slightly longer than wildtype for strains containing a pot-1::mCherry transgene (Figure 1, D and F).
POT-1 foci at C. elegans telomeres in vivo
Live imaging of animals possessing pot-1::mCherry transgenes revealed strong punctate POT-1::mCherry foci within the nuclei of sperm, some oocytes, and at the nuclear periphery throughout the rest of the germline (Figure 2, A−C). POT-1::mCherry foci could be robustly quantified in meiotic pachytene nuclei near the bend of germline arms, where the six homologous chromosomes of C. elegans are synapsed and in late stages of meiotic recombination (Dernburg ). Analysis of independent pot-1::mCherry transgene insertions, pot-1::mCherry.B and pot-1::mCherry.C, revealed approximately 12 foci per pachytene nucleus (11.8 ± 0.1; 11.9 ± 0.1; Figure 2G), which could plausibly correspond to chromosome termini of the six paired homologous chromosomes (Figure 2, D and F). Slightly fewer than the expected mean number of telomeric foci were observed, likely due to telomeres that were occasionally near one another within a nucleus, precluding them from being distinguished as distinct foci.
Figure 2
POT-1:mCherry localizes to telomeres as punctate foci independent of POT-2. Live imaging of pot-1::mCherry strains revealed germline-specific expression, including meiotic nuclei (A, B; solid brackets), mitotic nuclei (A; dashed brackets), oocytes (B; arrowheads), and sperm (C; arrow). (D) Representative image of pot-1::mCherry. (E) Representative image of pot-1::mCherry; pot-2(tm1400). (F) A representation of six C. elegans chromosomes in wild-type and in two strains harboring end-to-end chromosomal fusions (ypT24 and ypT28). Red circles at chromosome termini represent telomeres. (G) POT-1:mCherry foci were quantified in the meiotic nuclei of two independent wild-type strains, pot-1::mCherry.B (n = 83) and C (n = 54), in a pot-2(tm1400) mutant strain (n = 56), and in the strains ypT24 (n = 30) and ypT28 (n = 51). The close paring of both sister chromatids and homologous chromosomes in C. elegans oocytes precludes the resolution of telomeres from distinct homologous chromosomes and instead reveals 12 or 10 telomeric spots in wildtype or fusion strains, instead of 24 or 20, respectively. (H) Representative images of live pot-1::mCherry; GFP::histone animals demonstrate POT-1::mCherry localization at chromosome ends.
POT-1:mCherry localizes to telomeres as punctate foci independent of POT-2. Live imaging of pot-1::mCherry strains revealed germline-specific expression, including meiotic nuclei (A, B; solid brackets), mitotic nuclei (A; dashed brackets), oocytes (B; arrowheads), and sperm (C; arrow). (D) Representative image of pot-1::mCherry. (E) Representative image of pot-1::mCherry; pot-2(tm1400). (F) A representation of six C. elegans chromosomes in wild-type and in two strains harboring end-to-end chromosomal fusions (ypT24 and ypT28). Red circles at chromosome termini represent telomeres. (G) POT-1:mCherry foci were quantified in the meiotic nuclei of two independent wild-type strains, pot-1::mCherry.B (n = 83) and C (n = 54), in a pot-2(tm1400) mutant strain (n = 56), and in the strains ypT24 (n = 30) and ypT28 (n = 51). The close paring of both sister chromatids and homologous chromosomes in C. elegans oocytes precludes the resolution of telomeres from distinct homologous chromosomes and instead reveals 12 or 10 telomeric spots in wildtype or fusion strains, instead of 24 or 20, respectively. (H) Representative images of live pot-1::mCherry; GFP::histone animals demonstrate POT-1::mCherry localization at chromosome ends.Immunoprecipitation experiments have previously shown that a POT-1::HA fusion protein can interact with telomeric DNA in C. elegans (Raices ). To confirm that POT-1::mCherry foci occurred at telomeres, we used the well-characterized end-to-end chromosome fusions ypT24 and ypT28, which were isolated from C. elegans strains that were deficient for telomerase and then crossed onto telomerase-positive genetic backgrounds. These chromosome fusions were created from two chromosome ends that had lost all (TTAGGC)n telomeric repeat sequences as well as several thousand base pairs of subtelomeric DNA prior to being joined together (Lowden , 2011). Strains homozygous for ypT24 and ypT28 X-autosome chromosome fusions harbor five homologous chromosomes and 10 chromosome termini (Figure 2F), and these chromosome fusions can be stably maintained in C. elegans due to the presence of holocentric chromosomes. ypT24 and ypT28 chromosome fusions were crossed with pot-1::mCherry to create pot-1::mCherry; ypT24 and pot-1::mCherry; ypT28 strains, and quantification of POT-1 fluorescent foci in these strains revealed approximately 10 meiotic foci per nucleus (10 ± 0.1; 9.9 ± 0.1; Figure 2G), indicating that POT-1:mCherry foci correspond to discrete chromosome termini that are not clustered in meiotic pachytene nuclei. In addition, POT-1::mCherry foci were observed at termini of some condensed chromosomes in diakinesis-stage oocyte nuclei, where chromosomes were marked by histone H2B::GFP expression (Figure 2H). However, oocyte nuclei displayed reduced numbers of POT-1::mCherry foci in comparison with pachytene nuclei, and high-resolution images of POT-1::mCherry foci at both ends of a bivalent were not observed in oocytes. POT-1::mCherry expression became attenuated and more diffuse in the oocyte closest to the spermatheca.Our results demonstrate that POT-1 localizes to telomeres as small, quantifiable, nuclear domains and is unlikely to form foci at any other segment of the C. elegans genome. To our knowledge, this is the first demonstration that stable genome rearrangements can be employed to show that a telomere binding protein specifically interacts with telomeres in vivo. Telomere clustering has been reported as chromosomes pair during meiosis (Bass ; Cooper ; Scherthan ; Yamamoto and Hiraoka 2001), a process that occurs in transition zone nuclei of the C. elegans germline. POT-1::mCherry foci became diffuse and were rarely discrete at this stage of germ cell development (Figure S2), possibly due to rapid chromosome movements as chromosomes pair.In contrast to previous results suggesting different functions for POT-1 and POT-2 (Raices ), the lack of a qualitative additive telomere elongation phenotype for ; double mutants suggested a common function for their gene products (Figure 1D; Figure S1). Therefore, we assessed whether the telomeric localization of POT-1 was affected by POT-2 by quantifying POT-1::mCherry foci in live pot-1::mCherry; animals. Approximately 12 foci per meiotic pachytene nucleus were observed when was mutant (12 ± 0.1), and the POT-1::mCherry localization pattern was qualitatively similar throughout the germline in wild-type and mutant backgrounds (Figure 2, E and G). Thus, POT-2 did not have an obvious effect on the telomeric localization of POT-1.The distal portion of the C. elegans germline is composed of a population of proliferating mitotic cells (Cinquin ). In contrast to cells arrested in meiotic pachytene, quantification of POT-1::mCherry foci in mitotic nuclei revealed an average of 18.9 foci per nucleus (± 2 SD). We observed a broader range of foci per nucleus in the mitotic region (16−23, n = 31), in part due to the smaller size and denser clustering of the nuclei, which precluded the more precise resolution of POT-1::mCherry foci that was possible in large pachytene nuclei. As some mitotic nuclei displayed less than 24 POT-1::mCherry spots, weak telomere clustering is likely to occur in mitotic cells of C. elegans. However, the presence of 20−23 spots in some nuclei suggested that mitotic telomere clustering could either be transient or could vary with the cell cycle. Our pot-1::mCherry transgene was only expressed in germ cells, because it was driven by the germ cell−specific promoter. Future analysis of telomere behavior in somatic cell types may be an interesting line of investigation.
POT-1 and POT-2 repress telomerase activity at telomeres
To ascertain whether the telomere elongation phenotype of and mutants is mediated by telomerase, we crossed the and mutations into a telomerase-deficient background by constructing double and triple mutants with a null allele of the telomerase reverse transcriptase, . Telomeres shortened progressively in the absence of telomerase and , or both and (Figure 3, A−C). Therefore, telomere elongation of or single mutants depends on telomerase activity.
Figure 3
POT-1 and POT-2 negatively regulate telomerase-mediated telomere repeat addition. DNA collected from consecutive generations of (A) trt-1; pot-1, (B) trt-1; pot-2, (C) trt-1; pot-1; pot-2, and (D) trt-1 mutant strains was submitted to terminal restriction fragment length analysis. (E) To measure shortening rates, telomeres that were 2−6 kb in size and could be accurately scored for changes in length were examined. Error bars represent the SEM, and P values were determined by the Student’s t-test. (F) Six animals per strain (n = 40) of the indicated genotypes were passaged weekly until sterility, where one week indicates two generations of growth. Dashed line to the right of the blots indicates internal telomeric sequences.
POT-1 and POT-2 negatively regulate telomerase-mediated telomere repeat addition. DNA collected from consecutive generations of (A) trt-1; pot-1, (B) trt-1; pot-2, (C) trt-1; pot-1; pot-2, and (D) trt-1 mutant strains was submitted to terminal restriction fragment length analysis. (E) To measure shortening rates, telomeres that were 2−6 kb in size and could be accurately scored for changes in length were examined. Error bars represent the SEM, and P values were determined by the Student’s t-test. (F) Six animals per strain (n = 40) of the indicated genotypes were passaged weekly until sterility, where one week indicates two generations of growth. Dashed line to the right of the blots indicates internal telomeric sequences.In the absence of telomerase, canonical DNA polymerases cannot maintain telomere length, resulting in a loss of telomere sequence with each cell division. Previous analysis of strains that are deficient for independent alleles of , for mutations in three additional C. elegans genes that are required for telomerase-mediated telomere maintenance, or for double mutants corresponding to and the former genes, has revealed consistent rates of telomere erosion of ~120 bp per generation for every genotype (Ahmed and Hodgkin 2000; Boerckel ; Lowden ; Meier , 2009). We asked whether POT-1 or POT-2 affected the rate of telomere erosion in the absence of telomerase by quantifying telomere shortening for ; and ; double mutants, for ; ; triple mutants and for single mutant controls. An enhanced telomere erosion rate was observed for ; mutants (159 ± 12 bp/generation) in comparison to single mutants (122 ± 6 bp/generation; Figure 3D) or ; double mutants (123 ± 9 bp/generation; Figure 3E). Therefore, POT-1, but not POT-2, protects telomeres from exacerbated erosion in the absence of telomerase. Moreover, ; ; telomeres shortened at a similar rate (168 ± 9 bp/generation) to ; telomeres, indicating that POT-2 does not have an obvious telomere protection function in the absence of POT-1 (Figure 3E).To study the effects of the modestly exacerbated telomere erosion observed in mutant strains that are deficient for telomerase, the onset of sterility (senescence) was quantified for ; double mutants and ; ; triple mutants (n = 40 independent lines per strain). Both ; double mutants (26.8+/−1.3 generations) and ; ; triple mutants (≥44 ± 3.6 generations) exhibited longer trans-generational lifespans (the number of generations until sterility) in comparison to mutant controls (16.7 ± 0.4 generations; P < 0.001; Student’s t-test), despite their faster rates of telomere erosion (Figure 3F). In addition, ; ; triple mutants exhibited a significantly longer average trans-generational lifespan than the ; double mutants (P < 0.001; Student’s t-test), and some did not senesce (Figure 3F). Thus, although POT-1 mildly represses telomere shortening in the absence of telomerase, deficiency for or both and failed to enhance the onset of senescence in the absence of telomerase. This increased trans-generational lifespan is consistent with recent reports that either POT-1 or POT-2 can suppress the telomerase-independent telomere maintenance mechanism termed ALT (Cheng ; Lackner ).It has been previously reported that strains deficient for or with long telomeres display high levels of circular telomeric DNA (Raices ). Further, mammalian cells that use the ALT telomere maintenance pathway possess high levels of telomeric C-circles, an established marker of ALT (Henson ), and C. elegans ; ALT strains display increased levels of telomeric C-circles in comparison with wild type (Lackner ). We observed wild-type levels of telomeric C-circles in early-generation strains with short telomeres, and large 5- to 7-fold increases in C-circles in late-generation strains with long telomeres (Figure 4). Previously established ; ALT strains with telomeres of normal lengths (Cheng ) displayed little or no increases in C-circle formation, indicating that the high levels of C-circles in late-generation strains could require the presence of extremely long telomeres and possibly the activity of the telomerase reverse transcriptase. Consistent with the notion that telomerase could contribute to C-circle formation, ; ALT strains with either short or very long telomeres displayed modestly elevated levels of C-circles (Figure 4C). Our data suggest that elevated C-circle levels could contribute to ALT, although the greatest levels of C-circles were observed for late-generation that possess long telomeres and were wild type for telomerase.
Figure 4
Telomeric C-circle levels increase in late-generation pot-2 mutants. (A) A representative dot blot of a C-circle assay that was performed with DNA collected from multiple, independent mutant animals that were ALT, had grown for multiple generations (>20, “late”), or had grown for few generations (<6, “early”). (B) Quantification of C-circle assay amplification signals from (A). (C) Quantification of a C-circle assay with DNA from wild type, from late-generation pot-2 single mutants with long telomerase, and from a variety of ALT strains that harbored short or long telomeres.
Telomeric C-circle levels increase in late-generation pot-2 mutants. (A) A representative dot blot of a C-circle assay that was performed with DNA collected from multiple, independent mutant animals that were ALT, had grown for multiple generations (>20, “late”), or had grown for few generations (<6, “early”). (B) Quantification of C-circle assay amplification signals from (A). (C) Quantification of a C-circle assay with DNA from wild type, from late-generation pot-2 single mutants with long telomerase, and from a variety of ALT strains that harbored short or long telomeres.
Discussion
POT1 is a multifunctional telomere capping protein, and the presence of four C. elegans genes with homology to humanPOT1OB folds provides an opportunity to further elucidate the functions of POT1 in telomere biology. Here we show that C. elegansPOT-1 and POT-2 single-stranded telomere-binding proteins negatively regulate telomerase-mediated telomere repeat addition. In addition, abrogation of telomerase activity in or mutants resulted in progressive telomere erosion. In vitro studies have previously shown that POT-1 preferentially interacts with single-stranded G-rich telomeric DNA, whereas POT-2 interacts with single-stranded C-rich telomeric DNA (Raices ), suggesting that these proteins may play distinct roles at telomeres. Qualitatively similar telomere elongation dynamics for and mutants, and for ; double mutants, suggest that these proteins may function in a similar manner to repress telomerase. Our data do not allow us to distinguish whether POT-1 and POT-2 function at distinct steps to repress telomerase or if this occurs via a POT-1/POT-2 heterodimer that possesses both OB1 and OB2 folds and could structurally resemble canonical POT1 proteins (Figure 5A).
Figure 5
Model for interactions of POT-1 and POT-2 with telomerase and ALT. (A) POT-1 and POT-2 may repress telomerase-mediated telomere length maintenance via independent functions in the same process (left) or as a heterodimer (right). (B) In the absence of telomerase, POT-1 and POT-2 independently repress ALT-mediated telomere maintenance. (C) Early-generation telomerase mutants typically possess telomeres of normal lengths (top right), but deficiency for trt-1 and pot-1 (middle right) or for both pot-1 and pot-2 (bottom right) may initiate a rapid yet transient telomerase-independent telomere maintenance process that extends telomeres (length of double-stranded telomeric duplex is not drawn to scale), thereby allowing for an extended number of generations prior to senescence. A subset of trt-1; pot-2; pot-1 triple mutants (bottom right) may activate an ALT-mediated telomere maintenance pathway, thereby allowing for immortalization in later generations.
Model for interactions of POT-1 and POT-2 with telomerase and ALT. (A) POT-1 and POT-2 may repress telomerase-mediated telomere length maintenance via independent functions in the same process (left) or as a heterodimer (right). (B) In the absence of telomerase, POT-1 and POT-2 independently repress ALT-mediated telomere maintenance. (C) Early-generation telomerase mutants typically possess telomeres of normal lengths (top right), but deficiency for trt-1 and pot-1 (middle right) or for both pot-1 and pot-2 (bottom right) may initiate a rapid yet transient telomerase-independent telomere maintenance process that extends telomeres (length of double-stranded telomeric duplex is not drawn to scale), thereby allowing for an extended number of generations prior to senescence. A subset of trt-1; pot-2; pot-1 triple mutants (bottom right) may activate an ALT-mediated telomere maintenance pathway, thereby allowing for immortalization in later generations.We provide evidence for a distinct role for POT-1 in C. elegans telomere biology, as deficiency for but not modestly enhanced the rate of telomere erosion in mutants, suggesting a telomere capping function of POT-1. POT-1 is the sole C. elegans protein with an OB1 fold (Figure 1A) and can interact with non-terminal segments of single-stranded telomeric oligonucleotides in vitro (Raices ). Thus, POT-1 may be well positioned to prevent resection of the 5′ end of the C-rich strand of the telomere. Consistent with our observations, mammalianPOT1 has been shown to protect the 5′ end of the telomeric C-strand, which could be subjected to aberrant processing or resection in the absence of POT-1 (Hockemeyer ). In contrast, the OB2 fold of POT-2 is predicted to interact with the 3′ end of single-stranded telomeric overhangs (Raices ), which could be less relevant to protection or processing of telomeres in the absence of telomerase.Deficiency for delayed the senescence phenotype of telomerase mutants, even though a modestly faster rate of telomere erosion occurred when was deficient. Recent independent reports have indicated that deficiency for or can promote the telomerase-independent telomere maintenance pathway ALT in mutants (Cheng ; Lackner ). POT-1 has been previously shown to repress C-circle formation (Raices ), a bona fide marker of ALT, and here we show the same function for POT-2 (Figure 4), suggesting that DNA replication intermediates relevant to ALT may occur in animals lacking either of these proteins. We previously observed an ALT phenotype that allows telomerase mutants to escape senescence indefinitely, but only when hundreds of animals were transferred weekly (Cheng ). In the present study, we transferred only 6 animals once a week, which we expected might preclude the onset of a full-blown ALT phenotype. We observed temporary extension of trans-generational lifespan for strains deficient for . However, a subset of ; ; triple mutants strains survived indefinitely when 6 larvae were transferred (Figure 3F). This indefinite survival phenotype, in conjunction with a longer trans-generational lifespan of ; ; triple mutants in comparison to ; double mutants (Figure 3F), is consistent with our previous observation that POT-1 and POT-2 have independent roles in repressing a telomerase-independent telomere replication pathway (Figure 5B; Cheng ), which may become fully engaged to robustly drive ALT in small populations of animals when both and are deficient. We observed that early generation ; or ; ; mutants had longer initial telomere lengths than single mutants (Figure 3, A, C, and D), so initial telomere length may be largely responsible for the extended trans-generational lifespans of the double or triple mutants. Given that well-outcrossed or mutations with short telomere lengths were employed to establish these strains, we speculate that creation of strains that are deficient for or for both and promotes a telomerase-independent ALT-like pathway that rapidly extends telomeres in early generations (Figure 5C), but then dissipates allowing late-onset senescence to occur in most strains (Figure 3F).The modest and progressive effects of deficiency for or are at odds with rapid and severe telomere phenotypes that occur in the presence of telomerase for S. pombepot1 mutants (Baumann and Cech 2001), for P. patenspot1 mutants (Shakirov ), and for expression of C-terminally truncated Pot2 in Arabidopsis (Shakirov ; Surovtseva ). More modest effects have been observed when Pot1 was abrogated in mammalian cells (Hockemeyer ; Veldman ). The four C. elegansPOT1 homologs may each possess one or more functions of ancestral POT1, allowing their roles in telomere biology to be studied in detail. Finally, our pot-1::mCherry transgene allows for chromosome termini to be observed in living worms and may provide a useful tool for future studies of telomere and chromosome biology in C. elegans.
Authors: Blaine N Armbruster; Corinne M Linardic; Tim Veldman; Niharika P Bansal; Diane L Downie; Christopher M Counter Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: A Smogorzewska; B van Steensel; A Bianchi; S Oelmann; M R Schaefer; G Schnapp; T de Lange Journal: Mol Cell Biol Date: 2000-03 Impact factor: 4.272
Authors: Arshad Desai; Sonja Rybina; Thomas Müller-Reichert; Andrej Shevchenko; Anna Shevchenko; Anthony Hyman; Karen Oegema Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2003-10-01 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Luciana E Leopold; Bree N Heestand; Soobin Seong; Ludmila Shtessel; Shawn Ahmed Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2015-05-04 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Daniel E Cook; Stefan Zdraljevic; Robyn E Tanny; Beomseok Seo; David D Riccardi; Luke M Noble; Matthew V Rockman; Mark J Alkema; Christian Braendle; Jan E Kammenga; John Wang; Leonid Kruglyak; Marie-Anne Félix; Junho Lee; Erik C Andersen Journal: Genetics Date: 2016-07-22 Impact factor: 4.562