Literature DB >> 23389775

Psychological treatment of sex offenders.

R Karl Hanson1, Pamela M Yates.   

Abstract

This article reviews the research evidence, practice guidelines and accreditation standards for the psychological treatment of individuals who commit sexually motivated crimes. Overall, the sexual offender treatment outcome research is not well developed, which limits strong conclusions. There is, however, strong research evidence concerning the effectiveness of interventions for general (non-sexual) offenders. Given the considerable overlap in risk factors for sexual and general offending, the "what works" principles for general offenders provide useful guidelines for sexual offender treatment. Specifically, the intensity of treatment should be proportional to the offender's risk level (risk principle), treatment should focus on characteristics associated with recidivism risk (i.e., criminogenic needs; need principle), and be tailored to the learning style and abilities of clients (responsivity principle). Examples of promising new approaches to sexual offender treatment are provided.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389775     DOI: 10.1007/s11920-012-0348-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep        ISSN: 1523-3812            Impact factor:   5.285


  19 in total

1.  Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations.

Authors:  David Atkins; Dana Best; Peter A Briss; Martin Eccles; Yngve Falck-Ytter; Signe Flottorp; Gordon H Guyatt; Robin T Harbour; Margaret C Haugh; David Henry; Suzanne Hill; Roman Jaeschke; Gillian Leng; Alessandro Liberati; Nicola Magrini; James Mason; Philippa Middleton; Jacek Mrukowicz; Dianne O'Connell; Andrew D Oxman; Bob Phillips; Holger J Schünemann; Tessa Tan-Torres Edejer; Helena Varonen; Gunn E Vist; John W Williams; Stephanie Zaza
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-06-19

2.  Comment on Mailloux et al.'s (2003) Study "Dosage of treatment to sexual offenders: are we overprescribing?".

Authors:  W L Marshall; Pamela M Yates
Journal:  Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol       Date:  2005-04

3.  Effects of a relapse prevention program on sexual recidivism: final results from California's sex offender treatment and evaluation project (SOTEP).

Authors:  Janice K Marques; Mark Wiederanders; David M Day; Craig Nelson; Alice van Ommeren
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2005-01

4.  Matching Judicial Supervision to Clients' Risk Status in Drug Court.

Authors:  Douglas B Marlowe; David S Festinger; Patricia A Lee; Karen L Dugosh; Kathleen M Benasutti
Journal:  Crime Delinq       Date:  2006

5.  A U.K. cost-benefit analysis of circles of support and accountability interventions.

Authors:  Ian A Elliott; Anthony R Beech
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2012-05-07

6.  Predicting recidivism amongst sexual offenders: a multi-site study of static-2002.

Authors:  R Karl Hanson; Leslie Helmus; David Thornton
Journal:  Law Hum Behav       Date:  2009-06-18

7.  Circles of Support & Accountability: a Canadian national replication of outcome findings.

Authors:  Robin J Wilson; Franca Cortoni; Andrew J McWhinnie
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2009-12

8.  Predicting relapse: a meta-analysis of sexual offender recidivism studies.

Authors:  R K Hanson; M T Bussière
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1998-04

Review 9.  Pharmacological treatments for paraphilic patients and sexual offenders.

Authors:  Peer Briken; Martin P Kafka
Journal:  Curr Opin Psychiatry       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 4.741

10.  Can Circles of Support and Accountability (COSA) work in the United States? Preliminary results from a randomized experiment in Minnesota.

Authors:  Grant Duwe
Journal:  Sex Abuse       Date:  2012-08-01
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Does Treatment for Sexual Offending Work?

Authors:  Nichola Tyler; Theresa A Gannon; Mark E Olver
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2021-07-01       Impact factor: 5.285

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.