Literature DB >> 23389565

A prospective comparison of computer-navigated and fluoroscopic-guided in situ fixation of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Kenneth T Bono1, Michael D Rubin, Kerwyn C Jones, Patrick M Riley, Todd F Ritzman, William C Schrader, Paul Fleissner, Richard P Steiner, Melanie A Morscher, Mark J Adamczyk.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE) is usually treated with percutaneous in situ screw fixation to prevent further progression of deformity. The purpose of this investigation is to compare computer navigation (CN) techniques with traditional fluoroscopic (fluoro) techniques for in situ fixation of SCFE.
METHODS: This study was an IRB-approved prospective study of 39 hip pinnings in 33 children. CN techniques were used in 22 cases and fluoro in 17. The CN and fluoro groups were statistically similar in terms of grade and acuity of the slip. Children were assigned to the groups based on the intraoperative imaging technique used by the attending on call, with 3 surgeons in each group taking equal amounts of call. The "approach-withdraw" technique was used in all cases. Postoperative limited-cut, reduced-dose computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained to evaluate screw placement. This included blinded analysis for screw penetration of the joint, screw tip-to-apex distance, the distance the screw passed to the center of the physis, and attainment of center-center position. The number of pin passes, intraoperative radiation exposure, and operating room (OR) time were also analyzed. Statistics used included ANOVA, the χ and median tests.
RESULTS: Compared with the fluoro group, CN resulted in more accurate screw placement. There was 1 case of joint penetration in the fluoro group not appreciated intraoperatively but detected on postoperative CT. CN also resulted in statistically significant (P < 0.05) reduced screw tip-to-apex distance and distance to the center of the physis. There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in attainment of the center-center position, number of pin passes, or intraoperative radiation exposure. OR time averaged 19 minutes longer in the CN group. There was no case of avascular necrosis or chondrolysis in either of the groups.
CONCLUSIONS: Compared with traditional fluoro techniques, CN in situ fixation of SCFE results in more accurate screw placement, comparable number of pin passes and intraoperative radiation exposure, and increased OR time. The cost-benefit ratio of this technology requires careful consideration at each individual institution. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23389565     DOI: 10.1097/BPO.0b013e318274561b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Orthop        ISSN: 0271-6798            Impact factor:   2.324


  5 in total

Review 1.  [Epiphyseolysis of the femoral head: new aspects of diagnostics and therapy].

Authors:  J F Funk; S Lebek
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-08       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Computer-assisted subcapital correction osteotomy in slipped capital femoral epiphysis using individualized drill templates.

Authors:  Sima Zakani; Christopher Chapman; Adam Saule; Anthony Cooper; Kishore Mulpuri; David R Wilson
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2021-07-06

3.  Fluoroscopic imaging overestimates the screw tip to subchondral bone distance in a cadaveric model of slipped capital femoral epiphysis.

Authors:  M J Heffernan; B Snyder; H Zhou; X Li
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.548

4.  Comparison Perioperative Factors During Minimally Invasive Pre-Psoas Lateral Interbody Fusion of the Lumbar Spine Using Either Navigation or Conventional Fluoroscopy.

Authors:  Yue-Hui Zhang; Ian White; Eric Potts; Jean-Pierre Mobasser; Dean Chou
Journal:  Global Spine J       Date:  2017-07-28

5.  Intraoperative 2D C-arm and 3D O-arm in children: a comparative phantom study.

Authors:  M Prod'homme; M Sans-Merce; N Pitteloud; J Damet; P Lascombes
Journal:  J Child Orthop       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 1.548

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.