BACKGROUND: Previously, the authors demonstrated the feasibility of a pure transvesical natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for uterine horn resection (UHR) using a rigid ureteroscope in swine as an appendectomy model. However, visualization was poor, and there was room for improvement. The authors have assessed the feasibility and safety of a revised technique that uses a 5-mm rigid laparoscope. METHODS: Eight operations on four female pigs (35-40 kg) were performed as a proof of concept study. Four right-side operations were performed in a survival model. The surgical procedure was similar to the original technique. However, the rigid ureteroscope was replaced by a 5-mm laparoscope after modification of the access system. In addition, the clipped metal threads used for bladder closure were easily placed with a long 13-gauge needle. In the survival model, a Foley catheter was placed for 1 day. RESULTS: The new technique provided considerably better visualization and operability than the original technique. The mean total operative time was 96.6 ± 18.2 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 15.0 ± 13.5 ml. On postoperative day 3, pig 2 in the survival study died of peritonitis resulting from a small bowel injury. The lab results for the other pigs demonstrated no adverse events and tolerable immune responses. Necropsy showed complete healing of the vesicotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The revised transvesical NOTES UHR technique improved the outcomes and feasibility of the original technique. This approach may be translatable to human appendectomy procedures in the future.
BACKGROUND: Previously, the authors demonstrated the feasibility of a pure transvesical natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) for uterine horn resection (UHR) using a rigid ureteroscope in swine as an appendectomy model. However, visualization was poor, and there was room for improvement. The authors have assessed the feasibility and safety of a revised technique that uses a 5-mm rigid laparoscope. METHODS: Eight operations on four female pigs (35-40 kg) were performed as a proof of concept study. Four right-side operations were performed in a survival model. The surgical procedure was similar to the original technique. However, the rigid ureteroscope was replaced by a 5-mm laparoscope after modification of the access system. In addition, the clipped metal threads used for bladder closure were easily placed with a long 13-gauge needle. In the survival model, a Foley catheter was placed for 1 day. RESULTS: The new technique provided considerably better visualization and operability than the original technique. The mean total operative time was 96.6 ± 18.2 min, and the mean estimated blood loss was 15.0 ± 13.5 ml. On postoperative day 3, pig 2 in the survival study died of peritonitis resulting from a small bowel injury. The lab results for the other pigs demonstrated no adverse events and tolerable immune responses. Necropsy showed complete healing of the vesicotomy. CONCLUSIONS: The revised transvesical NOTES UHR technique improved the outcomes and feasibility of the original technique. This approach may be translatable to human appendectomy procedures in the future.
Authors: Riccardo Autorino; Jeffrey A Cadeddu; Mihir M Desai; Matthew Gettman; Inderbir S Gill; Louis R Kavoussi; Estevão Lima; Francesco Montorsi; Lee Richstone; Jens U Stolzenburg; Jihad H Kaouk Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2010-08-27 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Estevao Lima; Carla Rolanda; José M Pêgo; Tiago Henriques-Coelho; David Silva; José L Carvalho; Jorge Correia-Pinto Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-08 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Kazuki Sumiyama; Christopher J Gostout; Elizabeth Rajan; Timothy A Bakken; Jodie L Deters; Mary A Knipschield; Robert H Hawes; Anthony N Kalloo; Pankaj J Pasricha; Sydney Chung; Sergey V Kantsevoy; Peter B Cotton Journal: Gastrointest Endosc Date: 2006-11 Impact factor: 9.427
Authors: Estevao Lima; Carla Rolanda; Luís Osório; José M Pêgo; David Silva; Tiago Henriques-Coelho; José L Carvalho; Maria Bergström; Per-Ola Park; Charles A Mosse; Paul Swain; Jorge Correia-Pinto Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2008-06-13 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Estêvão Lima; Tiago Henriques-Coelho; Carla Rolanda; José M Pêgo; David Silva; José L Carvalho; Jorge Correia-Pinto Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2007-05-04 Impact factor: 4.584